Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation: Balancing Employee Medical Privacy and Public Health Research

United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation: Balancing Employee Medical Privacy and Public Health Research

Date: Oct 22, 1980
United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation: Balancing Employee Medical Privacy and Public Health Research Introduction The case of United States of America v. Westinghouse Electric...
Boyd v. Mintz: Federal Habeas Relief Granted Due to State Procedural Breakdown in Fourth Amendment Claims

Boyd v. Mintz: Federal Habeas Relief Granted Due to State Procedural Breakdown in Fourth Amendment Claims

Date: Sep 30, 1980
Boyd v. Mintz: Federal Habeas Relief Granted Due to State Procedural Breakdown in Fourth Amendment Claims Introduction In Rodney T. Boyd, Appellant, v. Ira Mintz, Superintendent of the New Jersey...
Parole Board's Arbitrary Decision in Block v. Potter Sets New Equal Protection Precedent

Parole Board's Arbitrary Decision in Block v. Potter Sets New Equal Protection Precedent

Date: Sep 24, 1980
Parole Board's Arbitrary Decision in Block v. Potter Sets New Equal Protection Precedent Introduction The case of John H. Block, Appellant v. Edwin Potter et al. (631 F.2d 233), adjudicated by the...
Reopening Bankruptcy Proceedings: Estoppel and IRS Collection of Tax Penalties and Interest

Reopening Bankruptcy Proceedings: Estoppel and IRS Collection of Tax Penalties and Interest

Date: Sep 5, 1980
Reopening Bankruptcy Proceedings: Estoppel and IRS Collection of Tax Penalties and Interest Introduction The case of Becker's Motor Transportation, Inc., and Needham's Motor Service, Inc. versus the...
Collateral Attacks on Consent Decrees: Society Hill Civic Association v. HUD & RDA

Collateral Attacks on Consent Decrees: Society Hill Civic Association v. HUD & RDA

Date: Aug 26, 1980
Collateral Attacks on Consent Decrees: Society Hill Civic Association v. HUD & RDA Introduction Society Hill Civic Association v. HUD & RDA is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Expansion of State Action under Section 1983 for University Campus Police

Expansion of State Action under Section 1983 for University Campus Police

Date: Aug 21, 1980
Expansion of State Action under Section 1983 for University Campus Police Introduction In the landmark case of Calvin Henderson v. Michael D. Fisher et al. (631 F.2d 1115, 3rd Cir. 1980), the United...
The Business Judgment Rule and Fiduciary Duty in Delaware Corporate Law: Comprehensive Analysis of Johnson v. Trueblood

The Business Judgment Rule and Fiduciary Duty in Delaware Corporate Law: Comprehensive Analysis of Johnson v. Trueblood

Date: Aug 1, 1980
The Business Judgment Rule and Fiduciary Duty in Delaware Corporate Law: Comprehensive Analysis of Johnson v. Trueblood Introduction Johnson, Gilbert P. and Johnson, Hervey M. v. Samuel J. Trueblood,...
Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company: Redefining Forum Non Conveniens and Choice of Law in Wrongful Death Litigation

Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company: Redefining Forum Non Conveniens and Choice of Law in Wrongful Death Litigation

Date: Jul 25, 1980
Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company: Redefining Forum Non Conveniens and Choice of Law in Wrongful Death Litigation Introduction The case of Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Company represents a pivotal moment in...
Establishing Qualified Journalistic Privilege for Unpublished Materials in Criminal Cases: Commentary on United States of America v. Cuthbertson

Establishing Qualified Journalistic Privilege for Unpublished Materials in Criminal Cases: Commentary on United States of America v. Cuthbertson

Date: Jul 24, 1980
Establishing Qualified Journalistic Privilege for Unpublished Materials in Criminal Cases: Commentary on United States of America v. Cuthbertson Introduction The case of United States of America v....
Invalidation of Pennsylvania's 180-Day Rule in Special Education under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act

Invalidation of Pennsylvania's 180-Day Rule in Special Education under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act

Date: Jul 16, 1980
Invalidation of Pennsylvania's 180-Day Rule in Special Education under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act Introduction In the landmark case Battle et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania...
Complete Diversity and Indispensability in Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG

Complete Diversity and Indispensability in Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG

Date: Jul 11, 1980
Complete Diversity and Indispensability in Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG Introduction Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG, 626 F.2d 293 (3rd Cir. 1980), is a pivotal case that...
Strict Tort Liability for Economic Losses: Jones Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

Strict Tort Liability for Economic Losses: Jones Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

Date: Jul 10, 1980
Strict Tort Liability for Economic Losses: Jones Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Introduction Jones Laughlin Steel Corporation, a Pennsylvania-based corporation, developed plans in...
Per Capita Taxes Excluded from 'Debt' Definition under FDCPA: Insights from Staub v. Harris Associates

Per Capita Taxes Excluded from 'Debt' Definition under FDCPA: Insights from Staub v. Harris Associates

Date: Jul 9, 1980
Per Capita Taxes Excluded from 'Debt' Definition under FDCPA: Insights from Staub v. Harris Associates Introduction The case of Fred G. Staub and Yvonne G. Staub v. G. H. Harris, James P. Harris, and...
Establishment of Federal Common Law Right of Contribution Under Title VII: Glus v. G.C. Murphy Co.

Establishment of Federal Common Law Right of Contribution Under Title VII: Glus v. G.C. Murphy Co.

Date: Jun 28, 1980
Establishment of Federal Common Law Right of Contribution Under Title VII: Glus v. G.C. Murphy Co. Introduction In Glus v. G.C. Murphy Co., 629 F.2d 248 (3d Cir. 1980), the United States Court of...
Reinforcing Conflict of Interest Protections for Former Prosecutors: Insights from United States v. Miller

Reinforcing Conflict of Interest Protections for Former Prosecutors: Insights from United States v. Miller

Date: Jun 27, 1980
Reinforcing Conflict of Interest Protections for Former Prosecutors: Insights from United States v. Miller Introduction United States of America v. Miller, William G. (624 F.2d 1198, United States...
Affirming Due Process: The Admissibility of Co-conspirator Testimony in Bisaccia v. The Attorney General of New Jersey

Affirming Due Process: The Admissibility of Co-conspirator Testimony in Bisaccia v. The Attorney General of New Jersey

Date: Jun 13, 1980
Affirming Due Process: The Admissibility of Co-conspirator Testimony in Bisaccia v. The Attorney General of New Jersey Introduction In the landmark case of Bisaccia v. The Attorney General of New...
Duty of Defense Counsel to Utilize Exculpatory Evidence: Insights from United States v. Trice

Duty of Defense Counsel to Utilize Exculpatory Evidence: Insights from United States v. Trice

Date: Jun 11, 1980
Duty of Defense Counsel to Utilize Exculpatory Evidence: Insights from United States v. Trice Introduction The case of United States of America v. Eugene Baynes, et al., Appeal of Gregory Trice (622...
Ensuring Due Process and Substantial Evidence in Disability Annuity Claims: Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board (1980)

Ensuring Due Process and Substantial Evidence in Disability Annuity Claims: Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board (1980)

Date: Jun 11, 1980
Ensuring Due Process and Substantial Evidence in Disability Annuity Claims: Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board (1980) Introduction Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board (625 F.2d 486, 3rd Cir....
Establishing Trade Dress Protection in Pharmaceutical Unfair Competition: SKF Co. v. Premo Pharm. Labs., Inc.

Establishing Trade Dress Protection in Pharmaceutical Unfair Competition: SKF Co. v. Premo Pharm. Labs., Inc.

Date: May 29, 1980
Establishing Trade Dress Protection in Pharmaceutical Unfair Competition: SKF Co. v. Premo Pharm. Labs., Inc. Introduction SKF Co., a pharmaceutical manufacturer, initiated legal action against Premo...
Preliminary Injunction Standards in Genetic Harm Claims: Analysis of Punnett v. Carter

Preliminary Injunction Standards in Genetic Harm Claims: Analysis of Punnett v. Carter

Date: May 14, 1980
Preliminary Injunction Standards in Genetic Harm Claims: Analysis of Punnett v. Carter Introduction Punnett, Hope, and Hinkie v. Carter is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert