Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Disability Benefit Denial - Burton v. Schweiker

Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Disability Benefit Denial - Burton v. Schweiker

Date: Apr 15, 1981
Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Disability Benefit Denial - Burton v. Schweiker Introduction In the landmark case of Vernice Burton v. Richard S. Schweiker, decided on April 14, 1981, the...
Ferri v. Bell: Reassessing Privacy Exemptions in FOIA Requests

Ferri v. Bell: Reassessing Privacy Exemptions in FOIA Requests

Date: Apr 2, 1981
Ferri v. Bell: Reassessing Privacy Exemptions in FOIA Requests Introduction The case of Francis Rick Ferri v. Bell presents a pivotal examination of the balance between individual privacy rights and...
Residential Placement as a Requirement for FAPE: Analysis of Kruelle v. New Castle County School District

Residential Placement as a Requirement for FAPE: Analysis of Kruelle v. New Castle County School District

Date: Apr 2, 1981
Residential Placement as a Requirement for FAPE: Analysis of Kruelle v. New Castle County School District Introduction Rev. Mrs. Carl H. Kruelle v. New Castle County School District is a landmark...
Enhancing FOIA Compliance: Insights from Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy

Enhancing FOIA Compliance: Insights from Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy

Date: Mar 20, 1981
Enhancing FOIA Compliance: Insights from Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Department of Energy Introduction The case of Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of Energy, adjudicated by the United...
Estoppel and Fiduciary Duty in Pension Benefit Administration: Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees

Estoppel and Fiduciary Duty in Pension Benefit Administration: Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees

Date: Feb 24, 1981
Estoppel and Fiduciary Duty in Pension Benefit Administration: Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees Introduction The case of Rosen, Leon, Appellant v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees Bartenders...
Enhancing Union Members' Free Speech Rights under the Landrum-Griffin Act: Mallick & Chadwick v. IBEW

Enhancing Union Members' Free Speech Rights under the Landrum-Griffin Act: Mallick & Chadwick v. IBEW

Date: Feb 24, 1981
Enhancing Union Members' Free Speech Rights under the Landrum-Griffin Act: Mallick & Chadwick v. IBEW Introduction The case of John H. Mallick and Billy N. Chadwick v. International Brotherhood of...
Enhancing Judicial Review: Comprehensive Evidence Evaluation in Cotter v. Harris

Enhancing Judicial Review: Comprehensive Evidence Evaluation in Cotter v. Harris

Date: Feb 21, 1981
Enhancing Judicial Review: Comprehensive Evidence Evaluation in Cotter v. Harris Introduction The case of Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, 642 F.2d 700 (3d Cir. 1981), serves as a pivotal...
Indemnity Agreement Reporting Requirements: Interpretation and Implications in Heist Caribe v. American Home

Indemnity Agreement Reporting Requirements: Interpretation and Implications in Heist Caribe v. American Home

Date: Feb 11, 1981
Indemnity Agreement Reporting Requirements: Interpretation and Implications in Heist Caribe v. American Home Introduction The case of C. H. Heist Caribe Corporation v. American Home Assurance Company...
Recognition of Counsel Appointment Discretion in Indigent Civil Rights Litigation

Recognition of Counsel Appointment Discretion in Indigent Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Feb 10, 1981
Recognition of Counsel Appointment Discretion in Indigent Civil Rights Litigation Introduction The case of Robert Allen Ray, et al. v. William B. Robinson, et al. consolidates a pivotal appellate...
Enforcement of Trademark Rights Post-Disaffiliation: United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees

Enforcement of Trademark Rights Post-Disaffiliation: United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees

Date: Jan 31, 1981
Enforcement of Trademark Rights Post-Disaffiliation: United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia Jaycees Introduction The case of United States Jaycees, a Non-Profit Missouri Corporation, and Pennsylvania...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Standards for Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Findley v. Jones Motor Freight

Third Circuit Reaffirms Standards for Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Findley v. Jones Motor Freight

Date: Jan 22, 1981
Third Circuit Reaffirms Standards for Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Findley v. Jones Motor Freight Introduction The case of Michael J. Findley v. Jones Motor Freight, Division Allegheny...
Double Jeopardy Permits Resentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 111 Following Vacatur of Section 924(c) Sentences

Double Jeopardy Permits Resentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 111 Following Vacatur of Section 924(c) Sentences

Date: Jan 21, 1981
Double Jeopardy Permits Resentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 111 Following Vacatur of Section 924(c) Sentences Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael M. Busic and Anthony LaRocca...
Third Circuit Establishes Right to Amend Pro Se Complaints in Civil Rights Litigation

Third Circuit Establishes Right to Amend Pro Se Complaints in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Jan 17, 1981
Third Circuit Establishes Right to Amend Pro Se Complaints in Civil Rights Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of Ross, Daniel, Martin, Jerryl, Appellants v. Detective Meagan et al., the...
Enhanced Scrutiny of ALJ Credibility Findings in Disability Claims: Smith v. Califano, Jr.

Enhanced Scrutiny of ALJ Credibility Findings in Disability Claims: Smith v. Califano, Jr.

Date: Jan 14, 1981
Enhanced Scrutiny of ALJ Credibility Findings in Disability Claims: Smith v. Califano, Jr. Introduction Leo R. Smith v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., 637 F.2d 968 (3d Cir. 1981), is a pivotal case in the...
Authority and Arbitration Agreements: Par-Knit Mills v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company

Authority and Arbitration Agreements: Par-Knit Mills v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company

Date: Dec 31, 1980
Authority and Arbitration Agreements: Par-Knit Mills v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company Introduction The case of Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd. revolves around the...
Affirmation of Limits on Executive Authority to Enforce Civil Rights via Injunctions: United States v. City of Philadelphia

Affirmation of Limits on Executive Authority to Enforce Civil Rights via Injunctions: United States v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Dec 30, 1980
Affirmation of Limits on Executive Authority to Enforce Civil Rights via Injunctions: United States v. City of Philadelphia Introduction The case United States of America v. City of Philadelphia,...
Enforcement of Consequential Damage Exclusions in UCC Contracts: Chatlos Systems v. NCR Corporation

Enforcement of Consequential Damage Exclusions in UCC Contracts: Chatlos Systems v. NCR Corporation

Date: Nov 27, 1980
Enforcement of Consequential Damage Exclusions in UCC Contracts: Chatlos Systems v. NCR Corporation Introduction The case of Chatlos Systems, Inc. v. National Cash Register Corporation (NCR...
Romeo v. Youngberg: Defining Due Process Standards for Institutionalized Individuals under 42 U.S.C. §1983

Romeo v. Youngberg: Defining Due Process Standards for Institutionalized Individuals under 42 U.S.C. §1983

Date: Nov 25, 1980
Romeo v. Youngberg: Defining Due Process Standards for Institutionalized Individuals under 42 U.S.C. §1983 Introduction In the landmark case of Romeo v. Youngberg, the United States Court of Appeals...
Upholding Directed Verdict on Sherman Act §1 Conspiracy Claims: Texaco v. Sweeney

Upholding Directed Verdict on Sherman Act §1 Conspiracy Claims: Texaco v. Sweeney

Date: Nov 4, 1980
Upholding Directed Verdict on Sherman Act §1 Conspiracy Claims: Texaco v. Sweeney Introduction In the landmark case of Edward J. Sweeney Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. and Petroleum...
Finberg v. Sullivan: Strengthening Debtor Protections in Postjudgment Garnishment Procedures

Finberg v. Sullivan: Strengthening Debtor Protections in Postjudgment Garnishment Procedures

Date: Oct 28, 1980
Finberg v. Sullivan: Strengthening Debtor Protections in Postjudgment Garnishment Procedures Introduction In the landmark case of Finberg, Beatrice, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert