Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Culpability in Bank Fraud and Larceny Under 18 U.S.C. §§1344 and 2113(b): The Goldblatt Decision

Clarifying Culpability in Bank Fraud and Larceny Under 18 U.S.C. §§1344 and 2113(b): The Goldblatt Decision

Date: Mar 12, 1987
Clarifying Culpability in Bank Fraud and Larceny Under 18 U.S.C. §§1344 and 2113(b): The Goldblatt Decision Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Goldblatt, 813 F.2d 619 (3d...
Negligent Misrepresentation and Estoppel in Garnishment Proceedings: Insights from J.E. Mamiye Sons, Inc. v. The Fidelity Bank

Negligent Misrepresentation and Estoppel in Garnishment Proceedings: Insights from J.E. Mamiye Sons, Inc. v. The Fidelity Bank

Date: Mar 7, 1987
Negligent Misrepresentation and Estoppel in Garnishment Proceedings: Insights from J.E. Mamiye Sons, Inc. v. The Fidelity Bank Introduction The case of J.E. Mamiye Sons, Inc. v. The Fidelity Bank...
Retention of Holdback Account Funds Upon Debtor’s Default and Absence of Waiver: Equimark v. C.I.T. Case Commentary

Retention of Holdback Account Funds Upon Debtor’s Default and Absence of Waiver: Equimark v. C.I.T. Case Commentary

Date: Mar 3, 1987
Retention of Holdback Account Funds Upon Debtor’s Default and Absence of Waiver: Equimark v. C.I.T. Case Commentary Introduction The case of Equimark Commercial Finance Company v. C.I.T. Financial...
Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: Henderson v. Carlson

Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: Henderson v. Carlson

Date: Feb 28, 1987
Substantial Evidence Standard Reinforced in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: Henderson v. Carlson Introduction The case of Henderson, Archie L. v. Norman Carlson, Director, Bureau of Prisons O'Brien,...
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Ethics Complainants: Edelstein v. New Jersey Supreme Court

Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Ethics Complainants: Edelstein v. New Jersey Supreme Court

Date: Feb 27, 1987
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Ethics Complainants: Edelstein v. New Jersey Supreme Court Introduction The case of Benjamin Edelstein v. New Jersey Supreme Court (812 F.2d 128) presents a...
Establishing Employer Liability under ERISA §510: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gavalik et al. v. Continental Can Company

Establishing Employer Liability under ERISA §510: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gavalik et al. v. Continental Can Company

Date: Feb 20, 1987
Establishing Employer Liability under ERISA §510: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gavalik et al. v. Continental Can Company Introduction The case of Gavalik et al. v. Continental Can Company examined...
Timeliness of Post-Trial Motions and Appealability of Judgments of Acquittal: Insights from United States v. Coleman & Del Bono

Timeliness of Post-Trial Motions and Appealability of Judgments of Acquittal: Insights from United States v. Coleman & Del Bono

Date: Feb 19, 1987
Timeliness of Post-Trial Motions and Appealability of Judgments of Acquittal: Insights from United States v. Coleman & Del Bono Introduction The case of United States of America v. Nathaniel Coleman,...
Expanded FLSA Anti-Retaliation Protections and Interest Presumptions in Brock v. Richardson Construction

Expanded FLSA Anti-Retaliation Protections and Interest Presumptions in Brock v. Richardson Construction

Date: Feb 19, 1987
Expanded FLSA Anti-Retaliation Protections and Interest Presumptions in Brock v. Richardson Construction Introduction Brock v. Richardson Construction, 812 F.2d 121 (3d Cir. 1987), serves as a...
Balancing Privacy and Public Interest: Insights from Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Philadelphia

Balancing Privacy and Public Interest: Insights from Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Feb 18, 1987
Balancing Privacy and Public Interest: Insights from Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Philadelphia Introduction The case of Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5, Robert S. Hurst et al. v. City...
State Action Immunity and Rational Basis in Solid Waste Management: An Analysis of Hancock Industries v. Schaeffer

State Action Immunity and Rational Basis in Solid Waste Management: An Analysis of Hancock Industries v. Schaeffer

Date: Feb 7, 1987
State Action Immunity and Rational Basis in Solid Waste Management: An Analysis of Hancock Industries v. Schaeffer Introduction Hancock Industries and ACE Service Corp. and Eastern Waste Removal and...
Affirmation of Objective Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops and Validation of ACCA Sentence Enhancements in United States v. Hawkins

Affirmation of Objective Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops and Validation of ACCA Sentence Enhancements in United States v. Hawkins

Date: Feb 4, 1987
Affirmation of Objective Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops and Validation of ACCA Sentence Enhancements in United States v. Hawkins Introduction United States of America v. Milton Hawkins,...
Strict Standards for Emotional Distress Claims in Asbestos Litigation Confirmed by Third Circuit

Strict Standards for Emotional Distress Claims in Asbestos Litigation Confirmed by Third Circuit

Date: Jan 31, 1987
Strict Standards for Emotional Distress Claims in Asbestos Litigation Confirmed by Third Circuit Introduction The case Wisniewski, Susan and Klock, Debra WISNIEWSKI v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., among...
Survival of Pre-existing Liens in Bankruptcy: Interpretation of 11 U.S.C. § 506(d)

Survival of Pre-existing Liens in Bankruptcy: Interpretation of 11 U.S.C. § 506(d)

Date: Jan 31, 1987
Survival of Pre-existing Liens in Bankruptcy: Interpretation of 11 U.S.C. § 506(d) Introduction Estate of Roger Lellock v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, A Corp., and the United States...
Indiana Law Governs Contribution Claims in FELA Actions: Insights from Shields v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Indiana Law Governs Contribution Claims in FELA Actions: Insights from Shields v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Date: Jan 30, 1987
Indiana Law Governs Contribution Claims in FELA Actions: Insights from Shields v. Consolidated Rail Corp. Introduction Shields, Arnett L. v. Consolidated Rail Corporation is a pivotal case decided by...
Establishing Comprehensive Standards for Official Oppression: Government of the Virgin Islands v. Kelvin Derricks

Establishing Comprehensive Standards for Official Oppression: Government of the Virgin Islands v. Kelvin Derricks

Date: Jan 22, 1987
Establishing Comprehensive Standards for Official Oppression: Government of the Virgin Islands v. Kelvin Derricks Introduction Government of the Virgin Islands v. Kelvin Derricks, 810 F.2d 50 (3d...
Indispensable Parties and Federal Jurisdiction: Steel Valley Authority v. American Standard

Indispensable Parties and Federal Jurisdiction: Steel Valley Authority v. American Standard

Date: Jan 21, 1987
Indispensable Parties and Federal Jurisdiction: Steel Valley Authority v. American Standard Introduction In the landmark case of Steel Valley Authority v. Union Switch and Signal Division, American...
Irreparable Harm in Preliminary Injunctions: Insights from ECRI v. McGraw-Hill

Irreparable Harm in Preliminary Injunctions: Insights from ECRI v. McGraw-Hill

Date: Jan 21, 1987
Irreparable Harm in Preliminary Injunctions: Insights from ECRI v. McGraw-Hill Introduction The case of ECRI, A Nonprofit Pennsylvania Corporation v. McGraw-Hill, Inc. addresses critical issues in...
Zoning Ordinances and the Limits of Regulatory Takings: An Analysis of Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township

Zoning Ordinances and the Limits of Regulatory Takings: An Analysis of Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township

Date: Jan 13, 1987
Zoning Ordinances and the Limits of Regulatory Takings: An Analysis of Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township Introduction The case of Pace Resources, Inc. v. Shrewsbury Township presents a...
Concurrent §1983 Claims and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Harper v. Jeffries

Concurrent §1983 Claims and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Harper v. Jeffries

Date: Jan 1, 1987
Concurrent §1983 Claims and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Harper v. Jeffries Introduction Michael Thomas Harper, representing himself as a pro se petitioner, appealed against Donald Jeffries and the...
Genericness Doctrine Reinforced: Third Circuit in A.J. Canfield Co. v. Concord Beverage Co.

Genericness Doctrine Reinforced: Third Circuit in A.J. Canfield Co. v. Concord Beverage Co.

Date: Jan 1, 1987
Genericness Doctrine Reinforced: Third Circuit in A.J. Canfield Co. v. Concord Beverage Co. Introduction The case of A.J. Canfield Company, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Honickman, Harold, an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert