Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Due Process in Public Employment Terminations: Morton v. Beyer

Clarifying Due Process in Public Employment Terminations: Morton v. Beyer

Date: Jun 25, 1987
Clarifying Due Process in Public Employment Terminations: Morton v. Beyer Introduction Ronald Morton v. Howard L. Beyer is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Excusing the Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Mayberry v. Petsock

Excusing the Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Mayberry v. Petsock

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Excusing the Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Mayberry v. Petsock Introduction Mayberry v. Petsock, 821 F.2d 179 (3d Cir. 1987), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Enhanced Interpretation of Contracts: Tigg v. Dow Corning Expands the Scope of the Parol Evidence Rule under Michigan UCC

Enhanced Interpretation of Contracts: Tigg v. Dow Corning Expands the Scope of the Parol Evidence Rule under Michigan UCC

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Enhanced Interpretation of Contracts: Tigg v. Dow Corning Expands the Scope of the Parol Evidence Rule under Michigan UCC Introduction Tigg Corporation v. Dow Corning Corporation is a seminal case...
McMahon v. Fulcomer: Establishing Standards for Knowing and Intelligent Waiver of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions

McMahon v. Fulcomer: Establishing Standards for Knowing and Intelligent Waiver of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Jun 9, 1987
McMahon v. Fulcomer: Establishing Standards for Knowing and Intelligent Waiver of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction In the landmark case of Joseph D. McMahon v. Thomas Fulcomer,...
UAW v. Mack Trucks: Affirming the Right to Injunctive Relief for Breaches of Collective Bargaining Agreements

UAW v. Mack Trucks: Affirming the Right to Injunctive Relief for Breaches of Collective Bargaining Agreements

Date: Jun 6, 1987
UAW v. Mack Trucks: Affirming the Right to Injunctive Relief for Breaches of Collective Bargaining Agreements Introduction The case of International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and...
Establishing General Jurisdiction Through Continuous and Systematic Business Contacts: Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings Loan Association

Establishing General Jurisdiction Through Continuous and Systematic Business Contacts: Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings Loan Association

Date: Jun 5, 1987
Establishing General Jurisdiction Through Continuous and Systematic Business Contacts: Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings Loan Association Introduction The case Provident National...
Lovelace v. Acme Markets: Affirming Strict Compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j)

Lovelace v. Acme Markets: Affirming Strict Compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j)

Date: May 30, 1987
Lovelace v. Acme Markets: Affirming Strict Compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j) Introduction Shelldon Lovelace, employed as a cashier by Acme Markets, Inc., alleged racial discrimination culminating...
Exhaustion of State Remedies and Standing in Prison Disciplinary Hearings: Ralph Brown v. Fauver

Exhaustion of State Remedies and Standing in Prison Disciplinary Hearings: Ralph Brown v. Fauver

Date: May 19, 1987
Exhaustion of State Remedies and Standing in Prison Disciplinary Hearings: Ralph Brown v. Fauver Introduction The case of Ralph Brown v. William H. Fauver, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Limitation on Public Officials' Right to Intervene in Prison Conditions Litigation: In Martin Harris et al. v. Pernsley

Limitation on Public Officials' Right to Intervene in Prison Conditions Litigation: In Martin Harris et al. v. Pernsley

Date: May 16, 1987
Limitation on Public Officials' Right to Intervene in Prison Conditions Litigation: In Martin Harris et al. v. Pernsley Introduction The case of Martin Harris, Albert Anthony, Orlando X. McCrea,...
Affirmation of Modified Chapter 9 Plan: Non-Discriminatory Classification of Unsecured Creditors in Municipal Bankruptcy

Affirmation of Modified Chapter 9 Plan: Non-Discriminatory Classification of Unsecured Creditors in Municipal Bankruptcy

Date: May 5, 1987
Affirmation of Modified Chapter 9 Plan: Non-Discriminatory Classification of Unsecured Creditors in Municipal Bankruptcy Introduction The case of Finch Fuel Oil Company v. Jersey City Medical Center...
Third Circuit Clarifies Rule 41(a)(1) Supremacy Over Rule 41(a)(2) in Voluntary Dismissals

Third Circuit Clarifies Rule 41(a)(1) Supremacy Over Rule 41(a)(2) in Voluntary Dismissals

Date: May 5, 1987
Third Circuit Clarifies Rule 41(a)(1) Supremacy Over Rule 41(a)(2) in Voluntary Dismissals Introduction In the landmark case of Manze, Jane Johnston and Manze, Charles, H/W, v. State Farm Insurance...
Strict Adherence to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j) Affirmed in Braxton v. United States

Strict Adherence to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j) Affirmed in Braxton v. United States

Date: Apr 30, 1987
Strict Adherence to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j) Affirmed in Braxton v. United States Introduction Fannie R. Braxton, the appellant, brought forth a medical malpractice action under the Federal Tort Claims Act...
Artesian Water Co. v. New Castle County: Establishing Precedents on CERCLA Response Cost Recovery

Artesian Water Co. v. New Castle County: Establishing Precedents on CERCLA Response Cost Recovery

Date: Apr 25, 1987
Artesian Water Co. v. New Castle County: Establishing Precedents on CERCLA Response Cost Recovery Introduction Artesian Water Company initiated a lawsuit against The Government of New Castle County...
Ensuring Voluntariness of Subsequent Confessions and Mandating Factual Findings for Restitution: United States v. Johnson

Ensuring Voluntariness of Subsequent Confessions and Mandating Factual Findings for Restitution: United States v. Johnson

Date: Apr 25, 1987
Ensuring Voluntariness of Subsequent Confessions and Mandating Factual Findings for Restitution: United States v. Johnson Introduction In United States v. Johnson, 816 F.2d 918 (3d Cir. 1987), the...
Separation of Jurisdiction and Merits in §1983 State Action Claims: Analysis of Kulick v. Pocono Downs Racing Ass’n, Inc.

Separation of Jurisdiction and Merits in §1983 State Action Claims: Analysis of Kulick v. Pocono Downs Racing Ass’n, Inc.

Date: Apr 24, 1987
Separation of Jurisdiction and Merits in §1983 State Action Claims: Analysis of Kulick v. Pocono Downs Racing Ass’n, Inc. Introduction Kulick v. Pocono Downs Racing Ass’n, Inc., 816 F.2d 895 (3rd...
Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Dismissal: Application of Strickland Test in Habeas Corpus Petition

Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Dismissal: Application of Strickland Test in Habeas Corpus Petition

Date: Apr 23, 1987
Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Dismissal: Application of Strickland Test in Habeas Corpus Petition Introduction The case of John Henry Dooley, Jr. v. George Petsock (No. 86-3257)...
Limiting Negligence Claims for Economic Loss in Product Damage: Insights from Aloe Coal Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.

Limiting Negligence Claims for Economic Loss in Product Damage: Insights from Aloe Coal Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.

Date: Apr 9, 1987
Limiting Negligence Claims for Economic Loss in Product Damage: Insights from Aloe Coal Co. v. Clark Equipment Co. Introduction Aloe Coal Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Clark...
Preserving Legal Controversy in Union Trusteeship Disputes: International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Kelly

Preserving Legal Controversy in Union Trusteeship Disputes: International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Kelly

Date: Apr 3, 1987
Preserving Legal Controversy in Union Trusteeship Disputes: International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Kelly Introduction The case of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders,...
Enforcement of Two-Tiered Settlements and Brakeman Rule in Excess Insurance Coverage: Pennsylvania Third Circuit Precedent

Enforcement of Two-Tiered Settlements and Brakeman Rule in Excess Insurance Coverage: Pennsylvania Third Circuit Precedent

Date: Apr 1, 1987
Enforcement of Two-Tiered Settlements and Brakeman Rule in Excess Insurance Coverage: Pennsylvania Third Circuit Precedent Introduction In The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania v. Lexington...
Third Circuit Expands Use of Indirect Evidence in ADEA Age Discrimination Cases: Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts

Third Circuit Expands Use of Indirect Evidence in ADEA Age Discrimination Cases: Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts

Date: Mar 20, 1987
Third Circuit Expands Use of Indirect Evidence in ADEA Age Discrimination Cases: Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts Introduction Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, 814 F.2d 893 (3d Cir. 1987), presents a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert