Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from O'Halloran v. Ryan Introduction The case of Francis O'Halloran v. Joseph Ryan serves as a pivotal examination of the...
Equal Protection Considerations for Attorneys' Access in Federal Prisons: Analysis of Sturm v. Clark Introduction The case of Cheryl J. Sturm v. Clark et al. addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Rule 11 Sanctions in Employment Termination Dispute Introduction The case of Albert J. Gaardino and Patricia Gaardino v. Ethyl Corporation, decided on December 14,...
Defining "Debt" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Insights from Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group Introduction The case of Zimmerman, John G., on behalf of himself and all others similarly...
Ensuring Proper Procedure: Third Circuit Reverses Default Judgment in EMCASCO v. Sambrick Introduction The case of Emcasco Insurance Company v. Louis Sambrick is a pivotal decision articulated by the...
Inmates' Right to Elective Abortion Unencumbered by Court-Ordered Release: Monmouth County v. Lanzaro Introduction The case of Monmouth County Correctional Institution Inmates v. Lanzaro evaluated...
Marxe v. AT&T: Clarifying the Requirement of Irreparable Harm for Title VII Retaliation Injunctions Introduction Francine Marxe v. C.W. Jackson, C.E. Yates, and AT&T Communications, Inc. is a pivotal...
Expert Testimony Requirement for Pretrial Detainees' §1983 Claims Affirmed in Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Kozakiewicz Introduction In the case of Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v....
Unanimity in Jury Verdicts: The United States v. James Beros Analysis Introduction The United States v. James Beros, Titus McCue A/K/A Tim McCune, 833 F.2d 455 (3d Cir. 1987), presents a pivotal...
IADA Non-Retroactivity Affirmed in Habeas Corpus Context: Charles Diggs v. Owens and Daughn Introduction In the appellate case of Charles Diggs v. David Owens, Superintendent and John Daughn, Warden,...
Establishing a Pattern of Racketeering Activity under RICO: Barticheck v. Fidelity Union Bank Introduction Barticheck et al. v. Fidelity Union Bank/First National State et al. is a pivotal case...
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Establishes Strict Adherence to Contractual Terms in Government Reimbursement Claims Introduction The case of In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation...
Compilation Theory Affirmed in FOIA Exemption: AFSC v. Department of Defense Introduction The case American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) v. Department of Defense (DoD), decided by the United...
Affirmation of Core Proceedings and Application of Clearly Erroneous Standard in Bankruptcy Litigation: Southeastern Sprinkler Co. v. Meyertech Corp. Introduction Southeastern Sprinkler Company, Inc....
Arbitration as Mandatory Dispute Resolution Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act: Insights from Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund Introduction The case of The...
Defining the Scope of Administrative Agency Review: Chrupcala v. Heckler Introduction Chrupcala v. Heckler, 829 F.2d 1269 (3d Cir. 1987), is a pivotal case in administrative law that clarifies the...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Dr. Hankins v. Temple University: Reinforcing Standards in Employment Discrimination and Due Process Claims Introduction The case of Hankins v. Temple University,...
Jury Trial Waiver and Non-Assumption of Pension Obligations: Insights from United Steelworkers v. NJ Zinc Introduction The case of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, Appellant, v. New Jersey...
Hershey Foods Corp v. Ralph Chapek Inc.: Reinforcing the Parol Evidence Rule in Integrated Contracts Introduction The case of Hershey Foods Corporation v. Ralph Chapek, Inc. (828 F.2d 989, 3rd Cir....
Front Pay for Lost Pension Benefits Recognized under ADEA: Analysis of Blum v. Witco Chemical Corp. Introduction The legal landscape of age discrimination in employment underwent a significant...