Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Limitation on Expert Witness Fees Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d): Insights from Leonard Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp.

Limitation on Expert Witness Fees Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d): Insights from Leonard Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp.

Date: Mar 11, 1988
Limitation on Expert Witness Fees Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d): Insights from Leonard Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp. Introduction The case of Leonard Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp. (841 F.2d 513)...
Good Faith Arguments Protected Under Rule 11: Insights from Teamsters Local Union No. 430 v. Cement Express

Good Faith Arguments Protected Under Rule 11: Insights from Teamsters Local Union No. 430 v. Cement Express

Date: Mar 10, 1988
Good Faith Arguments Protected Under Rule 11: Insights from Teamsters Local Union No. 430 v. Cement Express Introduction The case of Teamsters Local Union No. 430 v. Cement Express, Inc., Lehigh...
Substantive Due Process Violation through Arbitrary Denial of Building Permits: Bello v. Bethel Park

Substantive Due Process Violation through Arbitrary Denial of Building Permits: Bello v. Bethel Park

Date: Mar 2, 1988
Substantive Due Process Violation through Arbitrary Denial of Building Permits: Bello v. Bethel Park Introduction Bello v. Bethel Park is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Limits of Respondeat Superior in Federal Prisoners' Civil Rights Actions: Farmer v. Carlson

Limits of Respondeat Superior in Federal Prisoners' Civil Rights Actions: Farmer v. Carlson

Date: Mar 1, 1988
Limits of Respondeat Superior in Federal Prisoners' Civil Rights Actions: Farmer v. Carlson Introduction The case of Douglas C. Farmer v. Norman Carlson, et al. (685 F. Supp. 1335) was adjudicated by...
Third Circuit Clarifies Proper Application of Light Work and Nonexertional Limitations in Social Security Disability Determinations

Third Circuit Clarifies Proper Application of Light Work and Nonexertional Limitations in Social Security Disability Determinations

Date: Mar 1, 1988
Third Circuit Clarifies Proper Application of Light Work and Nonexertional Limitations in Social Security Disability Determinations Introduction In the landmark case of William M. Stunkard v....
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Bivens Actions: An Analysis of Lyons v. U.S. Marshals

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Bivens Actions: An Analysis of Lyons v. U.S. Marshals

Date: Mar 1, 1988
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Bivens Actions: An Analysis of Lyons v. U.S. Marshals Introduction Lyons v. U.S. Marshals is a significant appellate decision from the United States Court of...
Interpretation and Scope of Equitable Relief under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act: Analysis of Florham Park Chevron Inc. v. Chevron USA Inc.

Interpretation and Scope of Equitable Relief under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act: Analysis of Florham Park Chevron Inc. v. Chevron USA Inc.

Date: Feb 26, 1988
Interpretation and Scope of Equitable Relief under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act: Analysis of Florham Park Chevron Inc. v. Chevron USA Inc. Introduction The case of Florham Park Chevron,...
Clarifying Professional Liability Exclusions in Business Owners Insurance Policies: Harad v. Aetna Reversed

Clarifying Professional Liability Exclusions in Business Owners Insurance Policies: Harad v. Aetna Reversed

Date: Feb 24, 1988
Clarifying Professional Liability Exclusions in Business Owners Insurance Policies: Harad v. Aetna Reversed Introduction Harad, Charles A. and The Home Insurance Company v. The Aetna Casualty and...
Strict Application of Statute of Limitations in FTCA Medical Malpractice Claims: Barren v. United States

Strict Application of Statute of Limitations in FTCA Medical Malpractice Claims: Barren v. United States

Date: Feb 24, 1988
Strict Application of Statute of Limitations in FTCA Medical Malpractice Claims: Barren v. United States Introduction Barren v. United States (839 F.2d 987, United States Court of Appeals, Third...
Enhanced Protections for Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges in Discovery Involving Non-Party Insurers

Enhanced Protections for Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges in Discovery Involving Non-Party Insurers

Date: Feb 18, 1988
Enhanced Protections for Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges in Discovery Involving Non-Party Insurers Introduction The case of United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company et al....
Establishing Burden of Proof in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from SPANGLE v. VALLEY FORGE SEWER AUTHORITY

Establishing Burden of Proof in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from SPANGLE v. VALLEY FORGE SEWER AUTHORITY

Date: Feb 13, 1988
Establishing Burden of Proof in ADEA Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from SPANGLE v. VALLEY FORGE SEWER AUTHORITY Introduction SPANGLE v. VALLEY FORGE SEWER AUTHORITY is a pivotal case...
Legal Commentary: Protection of Regulatory Actions from Tort Claims in Brownsville Golden Age Nursing Home v. Wells et al.

Legal Commentary: Protection of Regulatory Actions from Tort Claims in Brownsville Golden Age Nursing Home v. Wells et al.

Date: Feb 10, 1988
Protection of Regulatory Actions from Tort Claims in Brownsville Golden Age Nursing Home, Inc. v. Wells et al. Establishing Immunity for Actions in the Public Interest Introduction The case of...
Enhancing 'Make Whole' Remedies in Race Discrimination Under Title VII: Analysis of Gunby v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.

Enhancing 'Make Whole' Remedies in Race Discrimination Under Title VII: Analysis of Gunby v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.

Date: Feb 5, 1988
Enhancing 'Make Whole' Remedies in Race Discrimination Under Title VII: Analysis of Gunby v. Pennsylvania Electric Co. Introduction Gunby v. Pennsylvania Electric Co. (840 F.2d 1108, 3d Cir. 1988) is...
Requiring Proof of Knowledge in Conspiracy and Aiding and Abetting Convictions: A Commentary on United States v. Wexler

Requiring Proof of Knowledge in Conspiracy and Aiding and Abetting Convictions: A Commentary on United States v. Wexler

Date: Feb 2, 1988
Requiring Proof of Knowledge in Conspiracy and Aiding and Abetting Convictions: A Commentary on United States v. Wexler Introduction United States of America v. Robert Craig Wexler is a significant...
GIIC v. Commissioner: Defining Corporate Control and Responsibility in Document Discovery for Tax Litigation

GIIC v. Commissioner: Defining Corporate Control and Responsibility in Document Discovery for Tax Litigation

Date: Jan 30, 1988
GIIC v. Commissioner: Defining Corporate Control and Responsibility in Document Discovery for Tax Litigation Introduction The case Gerling International Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Internal...
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Section 1983 Claims Established in Colburn v. Upper Darby Township

Enhanced Pleading Standards for Section 1983 Claims Established in Colburn v. Upper Darby Township

Date: Jan 27, 1988
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Section 1983 Claims Established in Colburn v. Upper Darby Township Introduction Sue Ann Colburn, Administratrix of the Estate of Melinda Lee Stierheim, deceased, v....
Affirmation of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy: The In re Ward Decision

Affirmation of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy: The In re Ward Decision

Date: Jan 16, 1988
Affirmation of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy: The In re Ward Decision Introduction The case of In re Cynthia Ward, Debtor-Appellee, appealed by Bowest Corporation, represents a pivotal decision by the...
Defining 'Claim' in Bankruptcy and Government Contracts: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Remington Rand Corporation

Defining 'Claim' in Bankruptcy and Government Contracts: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Remington Rand Corporation

Date: Jan 7, 1988
Defining 'Claim' in Bankruptcy and Government Contracts: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Remington Rand Corporation Introduction The case of In re Remington Rand Corporation, Remington Rand...
Facilitated Notice and Discovery in ADEA Class Actions: Insights from Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

Facilitated Notice and Discovery in ADEA Class Actions: Insights from Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

Date: Jan 6, 1988
Facilitated Notice and Discovery in ADEA Class Actions: Insights from Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Richard Sperling, et al. v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. (118...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Pennsylvania v. PepsiCo: Reinforcing the Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act's Scope

Affirmation of Dismissal in Pennsylvania v. PepsiCo: Reinforcing the Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act's Scope

Date: Jan 5, 1988
Affirmation of Dismissal in Pennsylvania v. PepsiCo: Reinforcing the Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act's Scope Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ex rel. Leroy S. Zimmerman,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert