Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Paid Professional Advice Is Protected Speech: Third Circuit Requires First Amendment Scrutiny of New Jersey’s Ban on Compensation for Veterans‑Claims Counseling

Paid Professional Advice Is Protected Speech: Third Circuit Requires First Amendment Scrutiny of New Jersey’s Ban on Compensation for Veterans‑Claims Counseling

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Paid Professional Advice Is Protected Speech: Third Circuit Requires First Amendment Scrutiny of New Jersey’s Ban on Compensation for Veterans‑Claims Counseling Introduction In a precedential opinion...
From Possibility to Probability: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Understaffing Allegations and Abstract Capacity Models Do Not Satisfy Rule 9(b)’s “Reliable Indicia” Requirement in FCA Cases

From Possibility to Probability: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Understaffing Allegations and Abstract Capacity Models Do Not Satisfy Rule 9(b)’s “Reliable Indicia” Requirement in FCA Cases

Date: Apr 2, 2025
From Possibility to Probability: Third Circuit Reaffirms That Understaffing Allegations and Abstract Capacity Models Do Not Satisfy Rule 9(b)’s “Reliable Indicia” Requirement in FCA Cases Note: The...
Rule 56 Clarified: Unverified Complaints and Unsworn Prison Grievances Are Not Competent Summary-Judgment Evidence; Non-Assertive Commands Are Non-Hearsay — Commentary on Travillion v. Wetzel (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2025)

Rule 56 Clarified: Unverified Complaints and Unsworn Prison Grievances Are Not Competent Summary-Judgment Evidence; Non-Assertive Commands Are Non-Hearsay — Commentary on Travillion v. Wetzel (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2025)

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Rule 56 Clarified: Unverified Complaints and Unsworn Prison Grievances Are Not Competent Summary-Judgment Evidence; Non-Assertive Commands Are Non-Hearsay Case: Jamar L. Travillion v. John E. Wetzel,...
Third Circuit’s Brookins Rule: Mandatory Content for Anders Briefs in Supervised Release Revocation Appeals

Third Circuit’s Brookins Rule: Mandatory Content for Anders Briefs in Supervised Release Revocation Appeals

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Third Circuit’s Brookins Rule: Mandatory Content for Anders Briefs in Supervised Release Revocation Appeals Introduction In United States v. Anthony Brookins (3d Cir. Apr. 1, 2025) (precedential),...
No Formal Hierarchy Required: Third Circuit Affirms Tier III Designation of the Grey Wolves and Broad Reach of the INA’s Material-Support Bar

No Formal Hierarchy Required: Third Circuit Affirms Tier III Designation of the Grey Wolves and Broad Reach of the INA’s Material-Support Bar

Date: Apr 2, 2025
No Formal Hierarchy Required: Third Circuit Affirms Tier III Designation of the Grey Wolves and Broad Reach of the INA’s Material-Support Bar Case: Askin Ozturk v. Attorney General of the United...
Third Circuit Reaffirms: No Per Se “Futility” Bar—Reimposing Supervised Release for Deterrence and Rehabilitation Is Substantively Reasonable Even After Repeated Violations

Third Circuit Reaffirms: No Per Se “Futility” Bar—Reimposing Supervised Release for Deterrence and Rehabilitation Is Substantively Reasonable Even After Repeated Violations

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Third Circuit Reaffirms: No Per Se “Futility” Bar—Reimposing Supervised Release for Deterrence and Rehabilitation Is Substantively Reasonable Even After Repeated Violations Case: United States v....
Flexible Campus Due Process and Strict Causation for Retaliation: The Third Circuit’s Clarifications in Williams v. Pennsylvania State University

Flexible Campus Due Process and Strict Causation for Retaliation: The Third Circuit’s Clarifications in Williams v. Pennsylvania State University

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Flexible Campus Due Process and Strict Causation for Retaliation: The Third Circuit’s Clarifications in Williams v. Pennsylvania State University Introduction In Williams v. Pennsylvania State...
End-Organ Effects or Explanation Required: Third Circuit Upholds ALJ’s Step‑3 Use of Record Silence and “Simple Tasks” RFC After Moderate Mental Limitations

End-Organ Effects or Explanation Required: Third Circuit Upholds ALJ’s Step‑3 Use of Record Silence and “Simple Tasks” RFC After Moderate Mental Limitations

Date: Apr 1, 2025
End-Organ Effects or Explanation Required: Third Circuit Upholds ALJ’s Step‑3 Use of Record Silence and “Simple Tasks” RFC After Moderate Mental Limitations Case: Ramon Placencia v. Commissioner of...
Reasonable Suspicion to Detain Managers of Unlicensed Bars; Deleted Undercover Texts Do Not Trigger Due‑Process Spoliation Absent Apparent Exculpatory Value or Bad Faith

Reasonable Suspicion to Detain Managers of Unlicensed Bars; Deleted Undercover Texts Do Not Trigger Due‑Process Spoliation Absent Apparent Exculpatory Value or Bad Faith

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Reasonable Suspicion to Detain Managers of Unlicensed Bars; Deleted Undercover Texts Do Not Trigger Due‑Process Spoliation Absent Apparent Exculpatory Value or Bad Faith Introduction In United States...
Minimal Explanation Suffices for Compassionate Release Denials; Amendment 826 Is Not Retroactive Under § 3582(c)(2)

Minimal Explanation Suffices for Compassionate Release Denials; Amendment 826 Is Not Retroactive Under § 3582(c)(2)

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Minimal Explanation Suffices for Compassionate Release Denials; Amendment 826 Is Not Retroactive Under § 3582(c)(2) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Third Circuit’s per curiam disposition in...
Reaffirming MVRA Restitution Proof and Explanation Requirements: PSR Assertions Alone Are Insufficient — United States v. Thomas (3d Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming MVRA Restitution Proof and Explanation Requirements: PSR Assertions Alone Are Insufficient — United States v. Thomas (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Reaffirming MVRA Restitution Proof and Explanation Requirements: PSR Assertions Alone Are Insufficient — United States v. Thomas (3d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of Amendment 826 and Clarifies Limits on “Unusually Long Sentence” Compassionate Release Under § 1B1.13(b)(6)

Third Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of Amendment 826 and Clarifies Limits on “Unusually Long Sentence” Compassionate Release Under § 1B1.13(b)(6)

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Third Circuit Reaffirms Non‑Retroactivity of Amendment 826 and Clarifies Limits on “Unusually Long Sentence” Compassionate Release Under § 1B1.13(b)(6) Introduction In United States v. Omelyan...
Limiting Instructions and Strong Independent Evidence Foreclose Habeas Relief for Prosecutorial Overreach Under AEDPA

Limiting Instructions and Strong Independent Evidence Foreclose Habeas Relief for Prosecutorial Overreach Under AEDPA

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Limiting Instructions and Strong Independent Evidence Foreclose Habeas Relief for Prosecutorial Overreach Under AEDPA Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s non-precedential...
Settlement-as-Revision under the MPPAA: Third Circuit Opens § 1401(b)(1) Collection Route After Mid-Arbitration Settlement

Settlement-as-Revision under the MPPAA: Third Circuit Opens § 1401(b)(1) Collection Route After Mid-Arbitration Settlement

Date: Mar 28, 2025
Settlement-as-Revision under the MPPAA: Third Circuit Opens § 1401(b)(1) Collection Route After Mid-Arbitration Settlement Introduction In Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v....
Brady Materiality Requires Reliability Impact; Delaware Rule 61(i) Bars Trigger Federal Procedural Default — Commentary on Mason v. State of Delaware (3d Cir. Mar. 26, 2025)

Brady Materiality Requires Reliability Impact; Delaware Rule 61(i) Bars Trigger Federal Procedural Default — Commentary on Mason v. State of Delaware (3d Cir. Mar. 26, 2025)

Date: Mar 27, 2025
Brady Materiality Requires Reliability Impact; Delaware Rule 61(i) Bars Trigger Federal Procedural Default Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s nonprecedential decision in Bruce...
Arbitrability Discovery Required When Agency to Assent Is Genuinely Disputed: Third Circuit Remands in Kirkham (Sessoms) v. TaxAct

Arbitrability Discovery Required When Agency to Assent Is Genuinely Disputed: Third Circuit Remands in Kirkham (Sessoms) v. TaxAct

Date: Mar 27, 2025
Arbitrability Discovery Required When Agency to Assent Is Genuinely Disputed: Third Circuit Remands in Kirkham (Sessoms) v. TaxAct Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Date:...
Draft Settlement with Material Blanks and No Signatures Is Not Enforceable under New Jersey Law

Draft Settlement with Material Blanks and No Signatures Is Not Enforceable under New Jersey Law

Date: Mar 27, 2025
Lento v. Altman: The Third Circuit Confirms that a Draft “Settlement Agreement” with Material Blanks and No Signatures Is Not an Enforceable Contract under New Jersey Law Court: United States Court...
Third Circuit Reaffirms: Public Defender Appeal Filings Are Not “State Action” Under § 1983; Conclusory Supervisory “Policy” Allegations Fail Under Iqbal

Third Circuit Reaffirms: Public Defender Appeal Filings Are Not “State Action” Under § 1983; Conclusory Supervisory “Policy” Allegations Fail Under Iqbal

Date: Mar 25, 2025
Third Circuit Reaffirms: Public Defender Appeal Filings Are Not “State Action” Under § 1983; Conclusory Supervisory “Policy” Allegations Fail Under Iqbal Case: Ashley Georges v. Helen C. Godby;...
Legislative Decision-Making and Retaliation Claims: Affirming Independent Municipal Judgment and the Limits of the Cat's Paw Doctrine

Legislative Decision-Making and Retaliation Claims: Affirming Independent Municipal Judgment and the Limits of the Cat's Paw Doctrine

Date: Mar 24, 2025
Legislative Decision-Making and Retaliation Claims: Affirming Independent Municipal Judgment and the Limits of the Cat's Paw Doctrine Introduction In the case of LINDA ATIYEH; GETTYSBURG INVESTORS...
Refining Pleading Standards: A New Benchmark for Plausible Employment Discrimination Claims

Refining Pleading Standards: A New Benchmark for Plausible Employment Discrimination Claims

Date: Mar 24, 2025
Refining Pleading Standards: A New Benchmark for Plausible Employment Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Jonathan Valentin v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Labor and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert