Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Excusable Neglect Doctrine Affirmed in Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation

Excusable Neglect Doctrine Affirmed in Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation

Date: Apr 17, 2001
Excusable Neglect Doctrine Affirmed in Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of IN RE ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCTS Liability Litigation, Alexander...
Broadening of RICO Conspiracy Liability: Insights from Smith v. Berg and the Impact of Salinas and Beck

Broadening of RICO Conspiracy Liability: Insights from Smith v. Berg and the Impact of Salinas and Beck

Date: Apr 14, 2001
Broadening of RICO Conspiracy Liability: Insights from Smith v. Berg and the Impact of Salinas and Beck Introduction Smith et al. v. Berg et al., 247 F.3d 532 (3d Cir. 2001), presents a pivotal...
Establishing the Limits of Lender Liability Under the WARN Act: Insights from Pearson v. Component Technology Corporation

Establishing the Limits of Lender Liability Under the WARN Act: Insights from Pearson v. Component Technology Corporation

Date: Apr 14, 2001
Establishing the Limits of Lender Liability Under the WARN Act: Insights from Pearson v. Component Technology Corporation Introduction In Pearson v. Component Technology Corporation, 247 F.3d 471 (3d...
Interpreting Contractual Ambiguity and Fiduciary Burden-Shifting in Joint Ventures: Analysis of Bohler-Uddeholm America, Inc. v. Ellwood Group, Inc.

Interpreting Contractual Ambiguity and Fiduciary Burden-Shifting in Joint Ventures: Analysis of Bohler-Uddeholm America, Inc. v. Ellwood Group, Inc.

Date: Apr 12, 2001
Interpreting Contractual Ambiguity and Fiduciary Burden-Shifting in Joint Ventures: Analysis of Bohler-Uddeholm America, Inc. v. Ellwood Group, Inc. Introduction Bohler-Uddeholm America, Inc. v....
Fargnoli v. Massanari: Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Disability Claims

Fargnoli v. Massanari: Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Disability Claims

Date: Apr 12, 2001
Fargnoli v. Massanari: Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Disability Claims Introduction The case of Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses and Mootness of Derivative Actions: An Analysis of Salovaara v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company and Lazard Freres Co.

Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses and Mootness of Derivative Actions: An Analysis of Salovaara v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company and Lazard Freres Co.

Date: Apr 6, 2001
Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses and Mootness of Derivative Actions: An Analysis of Salovaara v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company and Lazard Freres Co. Introduction In the landmark case...
Substantial Probable Cause and Good Faith Reliance Established in UNITED STATES v. Alex HODGE

Substantial Probable Cause and Good Faith Reliance Established in UNITED STATES v. Alex HODGE

Date: Apr 6, 2001
Substantial Probable Cause and Good Faith Reliance Established in UNITED STATES v. Alex HODGE Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Alex HODGE, 246 F.3d 301 (3d Cir. 2001),...
Inference of Weapon Possession from Threats in Armed Bank Robbery Convictions: United States v. Wolfe

Inference of Weapon Possession from Threats in Armed Bank Robbery Convictions: United States v. Wolfe

Date: Mar 30, 2001
Inference of Weapon Possession from Threats in Armed Bank Robbery Convictions: United States v. Wolfe Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Richard Allen Wolfe, 245 F.3d 257...
ERISA Preemption in Benefit Approval: Insights from Pryzbowski v. U.S. Healthcare

ERISA Preemption in Benefit Approval: Insights from Pryzbowski v. U.S. Healthcare

Date: Mar 28, 2001
ERISA Preemption in Benefit Approval: Insights from Pryzbowski v. U.S. Healthcare Introduction The case of Linda Pryzbowski v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc. et al. serves as a pivotal judicial decision...
Strict Thresholds for Judicial Estoppel in ERISA Claims Established by Third Circuit

Strict Thresholds for Judicial Estoppel in ERISA Claims Established by Third Circuit

Date: Mar 23, 2001
Strict Thresholds for Judicial Estoppel in ERISA Claims Established by Third Circuit Introduction In the landmark case MONTROSE MEDICAL GROUP PARTICIPATING SAVINGS PLAN; Montrose General Hospital,...
Standing in Challenging Attorneys' Fees in Class Actions: Insights from In re Cendant Corporation Prides Litigation

Standing in Challenging Attorneys' Fees in Class Actions: Insights from In re Cendant Corporation Prides Litigation

Date: Mar 22, 2001
Standing in Challenging Attorneys' Fees in Class Actions: Insights from In re Cendant Corporation Prides Litigation Introduction The case of In re Cendant Corporation Prides Litigation, decided by...
Informed Medical Judgment in Disability Onset: Walton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Informed Medical Judgment in Disability Onset: Walton v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Mar 21, 2001
Informed Medical Judgment in Disability Onset: Walton v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction The case of Geoffrey Walton v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,...
§36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Does Not Preempt State Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims: Green v. Fund Asset Management

§36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Does Not Preempt State Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims: Green v. Fund Asset Management

Date: Mar 17, 2001
§36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Does Not Preempt State Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims: Green v. Fund Asset Management Introduction In Green v. Fund Asset Management, 245 F.3d 214 (3rd...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Habeas Corpus Relief Post-Bailey: Analysis of In re Austen O. Nwanze

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Habeas Corpus Relief Post-Bailey: Analysis of In re Austen O. Nwanze

Date: Mar 14, 2001
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Habeas Corpus Relief Post-Bailey: Analysis of In re Austen O. Nwanze Introduction In re Austen O. Nwanze is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Clarifying the Right of First Refusal: Insights from Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc.

Clarifying the Right of First Refusal: Insights from Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc.

Date: Mar 10, 2001
Clarifying the Right of First Refusal: Insights from Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. Introduction The case of Cristen M. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc., adjudicated by the United...
Interpreting the 'Firm Resettlement' Bar: The Abdille v. Ashcroft Decision

Interpreting the 'Firm Resettlement' Bar: The Abdille v. Ashcroft Decision

Date: Mar 8, 2001
Interpreting the 'Firm Resettlement' Bar: The Abdille v. Ashcroft Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Mohamed Abdille v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, adjudicated by...
Class Certification Standards under Federal Rule 23: The LifeUSA Holding Inc. Precedent

Class Certification Standards under Federal Rule 23: The LifeUSA Holding Inc. Precedent

Date: Mar 6, 2001
Class Certification Standards under Federal Rule 23: The LifeUSA Holding Inc. Precedent Introduction The case of In re LifeUSA Holding Inc. (242 F.3d 136) examined critical aspects of class action...
Third Circuit Limits Noerr-Pennington Immunity in Racial Conspiracy Claims: Barnes Foundation v. Lower Merion Township

Third Circuit Limits Noerr-Pennington Immunity in Racial Conspiracy Claims: Barnes Foundation v. Lower Merion Township

Date: Mar 6, 2001
Third Circuit Limits Noerr-Pennington Immunity in Racial Conspiracy Claims: Barnes Foundation v. Lower Merion Township Introduction The case of The Barnes Foundation v. The Township of Lower Merion...
Individualized Assessment in ADA's Direct Threat Exception: Insights from Doe v. County of Centre

Individualized Assessment in ADA's Direct Threat Exception: Insights from Doe v. County of Centre

Date: Mar 6, 2001
Individualized Assessment in ADA's Direct Threat Exception: Insights from Doe v. County of Centre Introduction Doe v. County of Centre is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Judicial Immunity Affirmed for Court-Appointed Custody Evaluators in Hughes v. Long and McHugh

Judicial Immunity Affirmed for Court-Appointed Custody Evaluators in Hughes v. Long and McHugh

Date: Feb 28, 2001
Judicial Immunity Affirmed for Court-Appointed Custody Evaluators in Hughes v. Long and McHugh Introduction Hughes v. Long and McHugh is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert