Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Mason v. Meyers: Expanding Prophylactic Protections for §2254 Habeas Petitions

Mason v. Meyers: Expanding Prophylactic Protections for §2254 Habeas Petitions

Date: Mar 21, 2000
Mason v. Meyers: Expanding Prophylactic Protections for §2254 Habeas Petitions Introduction Mason v. Meyers (208 F.3d 414) is a pivotal decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Preservation of Pretext and Mixed-Motive Standards in Employment Discrimination Cases: Watson v. SEPTA

Preservation of Pretext and Mixed-Motive Standards in Employment Discrimination Cases: Watson v. SEPTA

Date: Mar 21, 2000
Preservation of Pretext and Mixed-Motive Standards in Employment Discrimination Cases: Watson v. SEPTA Introduction Watson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is a landmark...
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator's Guilty Pleas Under Federal Rule of Evidence 403

Admissibility of Co-Conspirator's Guilty Pleas Under Federal Rule of Evidence 403

Date: Mar 15, 2000
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator's Guilty Pleas Under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Universal Rehabilitation Services (PA), Inc. explores the...
Affirmation of Embezzlement Conviction and Clarification of 'Otherwise Extensive' under Sentencing Guidelines §3B1.1

Affirmation of Embezzlement Conviction and Clarification of 'Otherwise Extensive' under Sentencing Guidelines §3B1.1

Date: Mar 15, 2000
Affirmation of Embezzlement Conviction and Clarification of 'Otherwise Extensive' under Sentencing Guidelines §3B1.1 Introduction In the case of United States of America v. William F. Helbling, 209...
Clarifying Procedural Standards for Rule 60(b) Motions in Confessed Judgments

Clarifying Procedural Standards for Rule 60(b) Motions in Confessed Judgments

Date: Mar 14, 2000
Clarifying Procedural Standards for Rule 60(b) Motions in Confessed Judgments Introduction In the case of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Exclusive Manager of Resolution Trust Corporation, as...
Clarifying Excessive Force Standards for Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Fuentes v. Wagner

Clarifying Excessive Force Standards for Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Fuentes v. Wagner

Date: Mar 11, 2000
Clarifying Excessive Force Standards for Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Fuentes v. Wagner Introduction Fuentes v. Wagner is a notable case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Narin v. Lower Merion School District: Affirmation of Summary Judgment under ADEA Framework

Narin v. Lower Merion School District: Affirmation of Summary Judgment under ADEA Framework

Date: Mar 11, 2000
Narin v. Lower Merion School District: Affirmation of Summary Judgment under ADEA Framework Introduction Sandra G. Narin v. Lower Merion School District, 206 F.3d 323 (3d Cir. 2000), is a pivotal...
Antimodification Clause Applicability to Wholly Unsecured Mortgages in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Antimodification Clause Applicability to Wholly Unsecured Mortgages in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Date: Mar 10, 2000
Antimodification Clause Applicability to Wholly Unsecured Mortgages in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Introduction The case of Stephen J. McDonald; Rosmarie J. McDonald v. Master Financial, Inc., decided by...
Clarifying the Least Restrictive Environment Requirement under IDEA: An Analysis of T.R.; E.M.R. v. Kingwood Township Board of Education

Clarifying the Least Restrictive Environment Requirement under IDEA: An Analysis of T.R.; E.M.R. v. Kingwood Township Board of Education

Date: Mar 10, 2000
Clarifying the Least Restrictive Environment Requirement under IDEA: An Analysis of T.R.; E.M.R. v. Kingwood Township Board of Education Introduction In the landmark case T.R.; E.M.R., on behalf of...
Strict Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Cases: Lingle v. Freedom Forge Corp.

Strict Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Cases: Lingle v. Freedom Forge Corp.

Date: Mar 8, 2000
Strict Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Cases: Lingle v. Freedom Forge Corp. Introduction The case of Lingle v. Freedom Forge Corporation illustrates critical...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Excessive Force Claims under PLRA §1997e(a)

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Excessive Force Claims under PLRA §1997e(a)

Date: Mar 8, 2000
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Excessive Force Claims under PLRA §1997e(a) Introduction In the case of Timothy Booth v. Churner, C.O.; Workensher, Sgt.; Rikus, Lt.; W. Gardner, Capt. (206...
Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.: Broadening Causation Inferences in Title VII Claims

Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.: Broadening Causation Inferences in Title VII Claims

Date: Mar 4, 2000
Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.: Broadening Causation Inferences in Title VII Claims Introduction Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company; Nabisco, Inc., 206 F.3d 271 (3d Cir. 2000), is a...
Shaner v. Synthes: Affirmation of Summary Judgment on ADA Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Shaner v. Synthes: Affirmation of Summary Judgment on ADA Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Date: Mar 3, 2000
Shaner v. Synthes: Affirmation of Summary Judgment on ADA Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Introduction Shaner v. Synthes (USA), 204 F.3d 494, is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Political Protest Arrests: Paff & Konek v. Kaltenbach

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Political Protest Arrests: Paff & Konek v. Kaltenbach

Date: Feb 29, 2000
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Political Protest Arrests: Paff & Konek v. Kaltenbach Introduction In the landmark case of John Paff; James Timothy Konek, Individuals, Appellants v. George...
Protected Property Interests in Subdivision Approvals: Woodwind Estates v. Stroud Township Establishes New Precedent under § 1983

Protected Property Interests in Subdivision Approvals: Woodwind Estates v. Stroud Township Establishes New Precedent under § 1983

Date: Feb 29, 2000
Protected Property Interests in Subdivision Approvals: Woodwind Estates v. Stroud Township Establishes New Precedent under § 1983 Introduction Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. Stroud Township is a landmark...
Swartz v. Meyers: Interpretation of AEDPA's Tolling Provisions in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Swartz v. Meyers: Interpretation of AEDPA's Tolling Provisions in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Feb 26, 2000
Swartz v. Meyers: Interpretation of AEDPA's Tolling Provisions in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Case Citation: Dale Swartz, Appellant v. Meyers, Superintendent; Pennsylvania Attorney General,...
Interpretation of Listed Impairments 1.13 and 1.10 in Social Security Disability Claims: Knepp v. Apfel

Interpretation of Listed Impairments 1.13 and 1.10 in Social Security Disability Claims: Knepp v. Apfel

Date: Feb 25, 2000
Interpretation of Listed Impairments 1.13 and 1.10 in Social Security Disability Claims: Knepp v. Apfel 1. Introduction In the landmark case of DURWOOD B. KNEPP, APPELLANT v. KENNETH S. APFEL,...
Third Circuit Clarifies Attorney's Fee Awards under IDEA: Catalyst Theory and Reasonableness of Fees

Third Circuit Clarifies Attorney's Fee Awards under IDEA: Catalyst Theory and Reasonableness of Fees

Date: Feb 25, 2000
Third Circuit Clarifies Attorney's Fee Awards under IDEA: Catalyst Theory and Reasonableness of Fees Introduction The case of REBECCA H. HOLMES et al. v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT explored...
Reasonable Suspicion Standard in School Drug Testing: Hedges v. Musco

Reasonable Suspicion Standard in School Drug Testing: Hedges v. Musco

Date: Feb 23, 2000
Reasonable Suspicion Standard in School Drug Testing: Hedges v. Musco Introduction Hedges v. Musco et al, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on February 22, 2000,...
Excessive Force Under the Eighth Amendment: Brooks v. Kyler et al.

Excessive Force Under the Eighth Amendment: Brooks v. Kyler et al.

Date: Feb 19, 2000
Excessive Force Under the Eighth Amendment: Brooks v. Kyler et al. Introduction In the landmark case Alan T. Brooks v. Kyler, Superintendent; Porterfield, Sgt.; Rupinski, C.O., decided by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert