Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Mason v. Meyers: Expanding Prophylactic Protections for §2254 Habeas Petitions Introduction Mason v. Meyers (208 F.3d 414) is a pivotal decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Preservation of Pretext and Mixed-Motive Standards in Employment Discrimination Cases: Watson v. SEPTA Introduction Watson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is a landmark...
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator's Guilty Pleas Under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Universal Rehabilitation Services (PA), Inc. explores the...
Affirmation of Embezzlement Conviction and Clarification of 'Otherwise Extensive' under Sentencing Guidelines §3B1.1 Introduction In the case of United States of America v. William F. Helbling, 209...
Clarifying Procedural Standards for Rule 60(b) Motions in Confessed Judgments Introduction In the case of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Exclusive Manager of Resolution Trust Corporation, as...
Clarifying Excessive Force Standards for Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Fuentes v. Wagner Introduction Fuentes v. Wagner is a notable case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Narin v. Lower Merion School District: Affirmation of Summary Judgment under ADEA Framework Introduction Sandra G. Narin v. Lower Merion School District, 206 F.3d 323 (3d Cir. 2000), is a pivotal...
Antimodification Clause Applicability to Wholly Unsecured Mortgages in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Introduction The case of Stephen J. McDonald; Rosmarie J. McDonald v. Master Financial, Inc., decided by...
Clarifying the Least Restrictive Environment Requirement under IDEA: An Analysis of T.R.; E.M.R. v. Kingwood Township Board of Education Introduction In the landmark case T.R.; E.M.R., on behalf of...
Strict Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Cases: Lingle v. Freedom Forge Corp. Introduction The case of Lingle v. Freedom Forge Corporation illustrates critical...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Excessive Force Claims under PLRA §1997e(a) Introduction In the case of Timothy Booth v. Churner, C.O.; Workensher, Sgt.; Rikus, Lt.; W. Gardner, Capt. (206...
Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.: Broadening Causation Inferences in Title VII Claims Introduction Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company; Nabisco, Inc., 206 F.3d 271 (3d Cir. 2000), is a...
Shaner v. Synthes: Affirmation of Summary Judgment on ADA Disability Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Introduction Shaner v. Synthes (USA), 204 F.3d 494, is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Political Protest Arrests: Paff & Konek v. Kaltenbach Introduction In the landmark case of John Paff; James Timothy Konek, Individuals, Appellants v. George...
Protected Property Interests in Subdivision Approvals: Woodwind Estates v. Stroud Township Establishes New Precedent under § 1983 Introduction Woodwind Estates, Ltd. v. Stroud Township is a landmark...
Swartz v. Meyers: Interpretation of AEDPA's Tolling Provisions in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Case Citation: Dale Swartz, Appellant v. Meyers, Superintendent; Pennsylvania Attorney General,...
Interpretation of Listed Impairments 1.13 and 1.10 in Social Security Disability Claims: Knepp v. Apfel 1. Introduction In the landmark case of DURWOOD B. KNEPP, APPELLANT v. KENNETH S. APFEL,...
Third Circuit Clarifies Attorney's Fee Awards under IDEA: Catalyst Theory and Reasonableness of Fees Introduction The case of REBECCA H. HOLMES et al. v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT explored...
Reasonable Suspicion Standard in School Drug Testing: Hedges v. Musco Introduction Hedges v. Musco et al, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on February 22, 2000,...
Excessive Force Under the Eighth Amendment: Brooks v. Kyler et al. Introduction In the landmark case Alan T. Brooks v. Kyler, Superintendent; Porterfield, Sgt.; Rupinski, C.O., decided by the United...