Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying the "In Connection With" Standard in Securities Fraud Claims: Semerenko v. Cendant Corporation

Clarifying the "In Connection With" Standard in Securities Fraud Claims: Semerenko v. Cendant Corporation

Date: Jun 17, 2000
Clarifying the "In Connection With" Standard in Securities Fraud Claims: Semerenko v. Cendant Corporation Introduction Semerenko v. Cendant Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Right of First Refusal Not Restricted by §818.9(b)(3): Crivelli v. General Motors Corp.

Right of First Refusal Not Restricted by §818.9(b)(3): Crivelli v. General Motors Corp.

Date: Jun 15, 2000
Right of First Refusal Not Restricted by §818.9(b)(3): Crivelli v. General Motors Corp. Introduction Crivelli v. General Motors Corporation is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Substantive Due Process and Civil Conspiracy: Defamation Claims and Underlying Tort Requirements in Boyanowski v. CAIU

Substantive Due Process and Civil Conspiracy: Defamation Claims and Underlying Tort Requirements in Boyanowski v. CAIU

Date: Jun 15, 2000
Substantive Due Process and Civil Conspiracy: Defamation Claims and Underlying Tort Requirements in Boyanowski v. CAIU Introduction Boyanowski v. Capital Area Intermediate Unit (CAIU) is a...
Establishing Secondary Meaning and Addressing Reverse Confusion in Trademark Disputes: Insights from Commerce National Insurance Services, Inc. v. Commerce Insurance Agency, Inc.

Establishing Secondary Meaning and Addressing Reverse Confusion in Trademark Disputes: Insights from Commerce National Insurance Services, Inc. v. Commerce Insurance Agency, Inc.

Date: Jun 14, 2000
Establishing Secondary Meaning and Addressing Reverse Confusion in Trademark Disputes: Insights from Commerce National Insurance Services, Inc. v. Commerce Insurance Agency, Inc. Introduction In the...
Third Circuit Rules Against Absolute and Qualified Immunity for Local Commissioners in Racial Retaliation Termination

Third Circuit Rules Against Absolute and Qualified Immunity for Local Commissioners in Racial Retaliation Termination

Date: Jun 10, 2000
Third Circuit Rules Against Absolute and Qualified Immunity for Local Commissioners in Racial Retaliation Termination Introduction The case of Robert E. Wright, Sr. v. Montgomery County, adjudicated...
Restricting Third-Party Standing in First Amendment Challenges: The Pitt News v. Fisher

Restricting Third-Party Standing in First Amendment Challenges: The Pitt News v. Fisher

Date: Jun 7, 2000
Restricting Third-Party Standing in First Amendment Challenges: The Pitt News v. Fisher Introduction The Pitt News v. D. Michael Fisher is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Sovereign Immunity Restricts Monetary Damages under Rule 41(e): Analysis of United States v. Esther Bein and William Bein

Sovereign Immunity Restricts Monetary Damages under Rule 41(e): Analysis of United States v. Esther Bein and William Bein

Date: Jun 6, 2000
Sovereign Immunity Restricts Monetary Damages under Rule 41(e): Analysis of United States v. Esther Bein and William Bein Introduction United States of America v. Esther Bein and William Bein (214...
Collateral Estoppel in ADA Claims Following Workers' Compensation Findings: Jones v. UPS

Collateral Estoppel in ADA Claims Following Workers' Compensation Findings: Jones v. UPS

Date: Jun 3, 2000
Collateral Estoppel in ADA Claims Following Workers' Compensation Findings: Jones v. UPS Introduction In the case of Neil E. Jones and Robert E. Jones v. United Parcel Service (UPS), the United...
Heightened Scrutiny in ERISA Benefit Denials by Dual-Role Insurance Administrators

Heightened Scrutiny in ERISA Benefit Denials by Dual-Role Insurance Administrators

Date: Jun 1, 2000
Heightened Scrutiny in ERISA Benefit Denials by Dual-Role Insurance Administrators Introduction The case of Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, decided by the United States...
Application of Delaware's One-Year Statute of Limitations to ERISA §502(a)(1)(B) Claims: Syed v. Hercules Inc.

Application of Delaware's One-Year Statute of Limitations to ERISA §502(a)(1)(B) Claims: Syed v. Hercules Inc.

Date: May 31, 2000
Application of Delaware's One-Year Statute of Limitations to ERISA §502(a)(1)(B) Claims: Syed v. Hercules Inc. Introduction The case of Sajid L. Syed v. Hercules Inc., decided by the United States...
Antitrust Standing in Generic Drug Litigation: Insights from In Re: Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litigation

Antitrust Standing in Generic Drug Litigation: Insights from In Re: Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litigation

Date: May 31, 2000
Antitrust Standing in Generic Drug Litigation: Insights from In Re: Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case of In Re: Warfarin Sodium Antitrust Litigation (214 F.3d 395) presents a...
Enhanced Notice Requirements in Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings Against Incarcerated Individuals: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. McGlory

Enhanced Notice Requirements in Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings Against Incarcerated Individuals: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. McGlory

Date: May 25, 2000
Enhanced Notice Requirements in Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings Against Incarcerated Individuals: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. McGlory Introduction The case of United States of...
Shoats v. Horn: Affirming Procedural Due Process in Administrative Custody

Shoats v. Horn: Affirming Procedural Due Process in Administrative Custody

Date: May 24, 2000
Shoats v. Horn: Affirming Procedural Due Process in Administrative Custody Introduction The case of Russell Shoats v. Martin Horn addresses the constitutional implications of prolonged administrative...
ERISA Interest Awards and Equitable Limitations: Insights from Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel

ERISA Interest Awards and Equitable Limitations: Insights from Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel

Date: May 24, 2000
ERISA Interest Awards and Equitable Limitations: Insights from Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Introduction In the landmark case of Arnold Holmes; Lawrence Hollyfield, Fiduciary to the...
Special Relationship and Affirmative Duties in Foster Care Placements: Nicini v. Morra

Special Relationship and Affirmative Duties in Foster Care Placements: Nicini v. Morra

Date: May 20, 2000
Special Relationship and Affirmative Duties in Foster Care Placements: Nicini v. Morra Introduction Anthony Nicini, Jr., a fifteen-year-old admitted to the John F. Kennedy Hospital's Crisis Center...
Third Circuit Clarifies Application of PLRA §803(d) on Dismissals Without Leave to Amend in §1983 Cases

Third Circuit Clarifies Application of PLRA §803(d) on Dismissals Without Leave to Amend in §1983 Cases

Date: May 20, 2000
Third Circuit Clarifies Application of PLRA §803(d) on Dismissals Without Leave to Amend in §1983 Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Stanford Shane; Otis Terrell; Robert Stewart v. William...
Third Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity: Non-Material Omissions in Warrant Affidavit

Third Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity: Non-Material Omissions in Warrant Affidavit

Date: May 20, 2000
Third Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity: Non-Material Omissions in Warrant Affidavit Introduction In the case of Franklin Wilson v. Darrin J. Russo et al., decided by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in NDPS v. Meridian Bank: Implications for Contractual Best Efforts and Tortious Interference

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in NDPS v. Meridian Bank: Implications for Contractual Best Efforts and Tortious Interference

Date: May 20, 2000
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in NDPS v. Meridian Bank: Implications for Contractual Best Efforts and Tortious Interference Introduction The case of National Data Payment Systems, Inc. (NDPS) v....
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in FERGUSON v. STATE: Procedural Amendments to Death Penalty Statute Do Not Violate Ex Post Facto Clause

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in FERGUSON v. STATE: Procedural Amendments to Death Penalty Statute Do Not Violate Ex Post Facto Clause

Date: May 18, 2000
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in FERGUSON v. STATE: Procedural Amendments to Death Penalty Statute Do Not Violate Ex Post Facto Clause Introduction FERGUSON v. STATE of Delaware (212 F.3d 226,...
United States v. Mannino: Reinforcing Sentencing Guidelines Compliance and Counsel Effectiveness

United States v. Mannino: Reinforcing Sentencing Guidelines Compliance and Counsel Effectiveness

Date: May 16, 2000
United States v. Mannino: Reinforcing Sentencing Guidelines Compliance and Counsel Effectiveness Introduction In United States of America v. Ignazio Antonino Mannino, a/k/a Nino, et al., the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert