Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Constructive Discharge and Age Discrimination: Insights from Duffy v. Paper Magic Group, Inc.

Constructive Discharge and Age Discrimination: Insights from Duffy v. Paper Magic Group, Inc.

Date: Sep 8, 2001
Constructive Discharge and Age Discrimination: Insights from Duffy v. Paper Magic Group, Inc. Introduction The case of Bernadine Duffy v. Paper Magic Group, Inc., adjudicated by the United States...
Collateral Consequences and Individualized Determination in Immigration Removal: The Lee Moi Chong Decision

Collateral Consequences and Individualized Determination in Immigration Removal: The Lee Moi Chong Decision

Date: Sep 6, 2001
Collateral Consequences and Individualized Determination in Immigration Removal: The Lee Moi Chong Decision Introduction Lee Moi Chong v. District Director, Immigration Naturalization Service is a...
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in Orthopedic Bone Screw Litigation

Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in Orthopedic Bone Screw Litigation

Date: Sep 1, 2001
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in Orthopedic Bone Screw Litigation Introduction The case of In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Product Liability Litigation involves a substantial number of...
Tolling Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations Through Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea: Insights from Nara v. Frank

Tolling Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations Through Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea: Insights from Nara v. Frank

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Tolling Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations Through Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea: Insights from Nara v. Frank Introduction Case: Joseph George Nara, Appellant, v. Frederick Frank Court: United...
Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Robberies and Photographic Identification in Bank Robbery Convictions: Analysis of United States v. Mathis

Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Robberies and Photographic Identification in Bank Robbery Convictions: Analysis of United States v. Mathis

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Robberies and Photographic Identification in Bank Robbery Convictions: Analysis of United States v. Mathis Introduction United States v. Keith Mathis, 264 F.3d 321...
Affirmation of Exclusion B in Professional Liability Insurance for Reasonable Foreseeability of Legal Malpractice Claims

Affirmation of Exclusion B in Professional Liability Insurance for Reasonable Foreseeability of Legal Malpractice Claims

Date: Aug 30, 2001
Affirmation of Exclusion B in Professional Liability Insurance for Reasonable Foreseeability of Legal Malpractice Claims Introduction The case of Coregis Insurance Company v. Baratta Fenerty, Ltd.,...
Third Circuit Limits Court-Imposed Auctions for Lead Counsel in PSLRA Class Actions

Third Circuit Limits Court-Imposed Auctions for Lead Counsel in PSLRA Class Actions

Date: Aug 29, 2001
Third Circuit Limits Court-Imposed Auctions for Lead Counsel in PSLRA Class Actions Introduction The case in question, IN RE CENDANT CORPoration Litigation, presented significant questions regarding...
Cowell v. Palmer Township: Establishing the Boundaries of the Continuing Violations Doctrine in Substantive Due Process Claims

Cowell v. Palmer Township: Establishing the Boundaries of the Continuing Violations Doctrine in Substantive Due Process Claims

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Cowell v. Palmer Township: Establishing the Boundaries of the Continuing Violations Doctrine in Substantive Due Process Claims Introduction Cowell v. Palmer Township is a pivotal case decided by the...
Affirmation of Franchise Termination Due to Material Breach: GM Corp. v. New AC Chevrolet, Inc.

Affirmation of Franchise Termination Due to Material Breach: GM Corp. v. New AC Chevrolet, Inc.

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Affirmation of Franchise Termination Due to Material Breach: GM Corp. v. New AC Chevrolet, Inc. Introduction In the case of General Motors Corporation Chevrolet Motor Division v. The New A.C....
Wenger v. Frank: Clarifying Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Proceedings

Wenger v. Frank: Clarifying Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Proceedings

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Wenger v. Frank: Clarifying Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Proceedings Introduction Wenger v. Frank is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Cendant Corp. Securities Fraud Case: Insufficient Scienter in Pleadings

Cendant Corp. Securities Fraud Case: Insufficient Scienter in Pleadings

Date: Aug 25, 2001
Cendant Corp. Securities Fraud Case: Insufficient Scienter in Pleadings Introduction The case of P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC, et al. v. Cendant Corp., et al. revolves around allegations of...
Reversing Summary Judgment in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Breach: Daniels v. Thomas Betts Corporation

Reversing Summary Judgment in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Breach: Daniels v. Thomas Betts Corporation

Date: Aug 25, 2001
Reversing Summary Judgment in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Breach: Daniels v. Thomas Betts Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Ida K. Daniels, Widow of Charles P. Daniels, Deceased v. Thomas...
Preclusive Effect of Statute of Limitations in ERISA Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Henglein v. Colt Industries

Preclusive Effect of Statute of Limitations in ERISA Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Henglein v. Colt Industries

Date: Aug 11, 2001
Preclusive Effect of Statute of Limitations in ERISA Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Henglein v. Colt Industries Introduction Henglein v. Colt Industries Operating Corporation is a...
Enhancing Transparency in Class Action Counsel Selection: Insights from In re CENDANT CORP.

Enhancing Transparency in Class Action Counsel Selection: Insights from In re CENDANT CORP.

Date: Aug 9, 2001
Enhancing Transparency in Class Action Counsel Selection: Insights from In re CENDANT CORP. Introduction The decision in In re CENDANT CORP. (formerly known as CUC International, Inc.), adjudicated...
Newton v. Merrill Lynch: Third Circuit Clarifies Class Certification Standards in Securities Fraud Litigation

Newton v. Merrill Lynch: Third Circuit Clarifies Class Certification Standards in Securities Fraud Litigation

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Newton v. Merrill Lynch: Third Circuit Clarifies Class Certification Standards in Securities Fraud Litigation Introduction Newton v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc.; PaineWebber, Inc.; Dean...
Abramson v. William Paterson College: Establishing Standards for Religious Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment Claims

Abramson v. William Paterson College: Establishing Standards for Religious Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment Claims

Date: Aug 4, 2001
Abramson v. William Paterson College: Establishing Standards for Religious Discrimination and Hostile Work Environment Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Gertrude W. Abramson v. William...
Enforcing Class Action Settlements: The Prudential Insurance Case

Enforcing Class Action Settlements: The Prudential Insurance Case

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Enforcing Class Action Settlements: The Prudential Insurance Case Introduction The case of In re: Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practice Litigation involves a significant legal...
Affirmation of Title VII’s Scope in Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Cases: Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Company

Affirmation of Title VII’s Scope in Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Cases: Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Company

Date: Aug 2, 2001
Affirmation of Title VII’s Scope in Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Cases: Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Company Introduction John J. Bibby, a long-term employee of the Philadelphia Coca-Cola...
Mathews v. Kidder Peabody Co.: Affirming the Injury Discovery Rule in RICO Claims

Mathews v. Kidder Peabody Co.: Affirming the Injury Discovery Rule in RICO Claims

Date: Aug 1, 2001
Mathews v. Kidder Peabody Co.: Affirming the Injury Discovery Rule in RICO Claims Introduction The case of Mathews v. Kidder Peabody Co. addresses significant issues related to the application of the...
Strict Enforcement of Lozada's Procedural Requirements in Reopening Immigration Proceedings

Strict Enforcement of Lozada's Procedural Requirements in Reopening Immigration Proceedings

Date: Jul 25, 2001
Strict Enforcement of Lozada's Procedural Requirements in Reopening Immigration Proceedings Introduction The case of XU YONG LU v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States addresses the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert