Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Pinkerton Liability in the Virgin Islands: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Louis Lopez, Jr.

Establishing Pinkerton Liability in the Virgin Islands: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Louis Lopez, Jr.

Date: Oct 25, 2001
Establishing Pinkerton Liability in the Virgin Islands: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Louis Lopez, Jr. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Louis Lopez, Jr., along with...
No Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement Between Distinct Security Providers

No Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement Between Distinct Security Providers

Date: Oct 20, 2001
No Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement Between Distinct Security Providers Introduction In the case of Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc., the United...
Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Trabal v. Wells Fargo

Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Trabal v. Wells Fargo

Date: Oct 17, 2001
Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Trabal v. Wells Fargo Introduction The case of Luis Trabal v. Wells Fargo Armored Service Corporation serves as a pivotal judicial decision in...
Third Circuit Sets New Precedents on Statute of Limitations for Disparate Pay and Affirms Validity of Hostile Work Environment Claims in Cardenas v. New Jersey

Third Circuit Sets New Precedents on Statute of Limitations for Disparate Pay and Affirms Validity of Hostile Work Environment Claims in Cardenas v. New Jersey

Date: Oct 17, 2001
Third Circuit Sets New Precedents on Statute of Limitations for Disparate Pay and Affirms Validity of Hostile Work Environment Claims in Cardenas v. New Jersey Introduction In the landmark case of...
Non-Signatory Third Party Beneficiaries and Arbitration: Insights from Dupont v. Rhodia

Non-Signatory Third Party Beneficiaries and Arbitration: Insights from Dupont v. Rhodia

Date: Oct 16, 2001
Non-Signatory Third Party Beneficiaries and Arbitration: Insights from Dupont v. Rhodia Introduction The case of E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company v. Rhodia Fiber and Resin Intermediates, S.A.S.,...
Fourth Amendment Seizure of Personal Property: Brown v. Muhlenberg Township

Fourth Amendment Seizure of Personal Property: Brown v. Muhlenberg Township

Date: Oct 12, 2001
Fourth Amendment Seizure of Personal Property: Brown v. Muhlenberg Township Introduction Brown v. Muhlenberg Township is a significant civil rights case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Full Performance Mandate Under 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3): The Third Circuit's Ruling in In re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp.

Full Performance Mandate Under 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3): The Third Circuit's Ruling in In re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp.

Date: Oct 11, 2001
Full Performance Mandate Under 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3): The Third Circuit's Ruling in In re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp. Introduction The case of In re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp., Debtor....
Affirmation of 'Deepening Insolvency' as a Cognizable Cause of Action in Bankruptcy Proceedings under Pennsylvania Law

Affirmation of 'Deepening Insolvency' as a Cognizable Cause of Action in Bankruptcy Proceedings under Pennsylvania Law

Date: Oct 10, 2001
Affirmation of 'Deepening Insolvency' as a Cognizable Cause of Action in Bankruptcy Proceedings under Pennsylvania Law Introduction The case of Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F....
Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Insights from United States v. Alex Vazquez

Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Insights from United States v. Alex Vazquez

Date: Oct 10, 2001
Enhancing Sentencing Standards in Drug Conspiracy Cases: Insights from United States v. Alex Vazquez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Alex Vazquez, adjudicated by the United...
Brightful v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency: Reaffirming the Strict Standard for Discharging Student Loans

Brightful v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency: Reaffirming the Strict Standard for Discharging Student Loans

Date: Oct 4, 2001
Brightful v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency: Reaffirming the Strict Standard for Discharging Student Loans Introduction In the landmark case In re: Patricia A. Brightful, the United...
Reaffirmation of Felon-In-Possession Statute’s Constitutionality Post-Lopez, Morrison, and Jones

Reaffirmation of Felon-In-Possession Statute’s Constitutionality Post-Lopez, Morrison, and Jones

Date: Oct 3, 2001
Reaffirmation of Felon-In-Possession Statute’s Constitutionality Post-Lopez, Morrison, and Jones Introduction In United States of America v. Jamaal Adeem Atif Singletary, 268 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 2001),...
Clarifying the Applicability of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 in Cable Piracy: Insights from TKR Cable Company v. Cable City Corporation

Clarifying the Applicability of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 in Cable Piracy: Insights from TKR Cable Company v. Cable City Corporation

Date: Oct 2, 2001
Clarifying the Applicability of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 in Cable Piracy Insights from TKR Cable Company v. Cable City Corporation Introduction The case of TKR Cable Company v. Cable City Corporation...
Appellate Flexibility in Securities Fraud Claims: The Landmark Decision in Elizabeth Werner et al. v. Werner Company

Appellate Flexibility in Securities Fraud Claims: The Landmark Decision in Elizabeth Werner et al. v. Werner Company

Date: Sep 28, 2001
Appellate Flexibility in Securities Fraud Claims: The Landmark Decision in Elizabeth Werner et al. v. Werner Company Introduction Elizabeth Werner et al. v. Werner Company, 267 F.3d 288 (3d Cir....
Limitations on Rule 15(c)(3) for Amending Complaints: Insights from Singletary v. Dually

Limitations on Rule 15(c)(3) for Amending Complaints: Insights from Singletary v. Dually

Date: Sep 22, 2001
Limitations on Rule 15(c)(3) for Amending Complaints: Insights from Singletary v. Dually Introduction Dorothy Singletary, individ. v. Dually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Edward Singletary,...
Non-Retroactive Application of APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY to Collateral Habeas Corpus: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Carnell Turner

Non-Retroactive Application of APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY to Collateral Habeas Corpus: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Carnell Turner

Date: Sep 22, 2001
Non-Retroactive Application of APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY to Collateral Habeas Corpus: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Carnell Turner Introduction The case In re Carnell Turner (267 F.3d 225) is a...
Ensuring Fair Cross Section in Jury Selection: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Rudolph Weaver

Ensuring Fair Cross Section in Jury Selection: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Rudolph Weaver

Date: Sep 22, 2001
Ensuring Fair Cross Section in Jury Selection: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Rudolph Weaver Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rudolph Weaver, decided by the United...
Strickland v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Affirming Ineffective Counsel Claims in Capital Sentencing

Strickland v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Affirming Ineffective Counsel Claims in Capital Sentencing

Date: Sep 22, 2001
Strickland v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Affirming Ineffective Counsel Claims in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of Fredric Jermyn, Appellant, v. Martin Horn et al.,...
Affirmation of Standing Requirements and Laches in Lanham Act Claims: Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America

Affirmation of Standing Requirements and Laches in Lanham Act Claims: Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America

Date: Sep 15, 2001
Affirmation of Standing Requirements and Laches in Lanham Act Claims: Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America Introduction The case of The Joint Stock Society, "Trade House of Descendants of Peter...
Johnston v. HBO: Class Certification Denied Due to Predominance of Individual Issues in Securities Fraud Claims

Johnston v. HBO: Class Certification Denied Due to Predominance of Individual Issues in Securities Fraud Claims

Date: Sep 15, 2001
Johnston v. HBO: Class Certification Denied Due to Predominance of Individual Issues in Securities Fraud Claims Introduction The case of Margaret L. Johnston and Paul E. Fontaine, on behalf of...
Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force in Fourth Amendment Section 1983 Claims: An Analysis of DeBellis v. Kulp

Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force in Fourth Amendment Section 1983 Claims: An Analysis of DeBellis v. Kulp

Date: Sep 11, 2001
Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force in Fourth Amendment Section 1983 Claims: An Analysis of DeBellis v. Kulp Introduction Nicholas W. DeBellis, III, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Patrol Officer Charles...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert