Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Criteria for Jury Instructions on Venue: Insights from United States v. Perez et al.

Establishing Criteria for Jury Instructions on Venue: Insights from United States v. Perez et al.

Date: Feb 5, 2002
Establishing Criteria for Jury Instructions on Venue: Insights from United States v. Perez et al. Introduction United States of America v. Linette Perez, Juancho Alcantera, and Edmundo Batoon,...
Finality of Settlement Agreements and Limitations on Rule 60(b) Relief: Coltec Industries, Inc. v. UMWA Combined Benefit Fund

Finality of Settlement Agreements and Limitations on Rule 60(b) Relief: Coltec Industries, Inc. v. UMWA Combined Benefit Fund

Date: Feb 2, 2002
Finality of Settlement Agreements and Limitations on Rule 60(b) Relief: Coltec Industries, Inc. v. UMWA Combined Benefit Fund Introduction Coltec Industries, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, filed a...
Bailey v. United Airlines: Determining the Commencement of ADEA Statute of Limitations in Age Discrimination Cases

Bailey v. United Airlines: Determining the Commencement of ADEA Statute of Limitations in Age Discrimination Cases

Date: Feb 2, 2002
Bailey v. United Airlines: Determining the Commencement of ADEA Statute of Limitations in Age Discrimination Cases Introduction In Bailey v. United Airlines, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under ERISA: Analysis of Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Co.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under ERISA: Analysis of Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Co.

Date: Jan 31, 2002
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under ERISA: Analysis of Harrow v. Prudential Insurance Co. Introduction Stanley Harrow, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Debra Harrow,...
Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Boone and Weston: Sentencing Guidelines and Legal Precedents

Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Boone and Weston: Sentencing Guidelines and Legal Precedents

Date: Jan 30, 2002
Sentencing Guidelines and Drug Quantity Calculations: Insights from United States v. Boone and Weston Introduction The case of United States of America v. Larry Boone and Thomas Weston serves as a...
Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy: Affirmation of Money Damages Over Injunctive Relief in In re Continental Airlines, Inc.

Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy: Affirmation of Money Damages Over Injunctive Relief in In re Continental Airlines, Inc.

Date: Jan 26, 2002
Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy: Affirmation of Money Damages Over Injunctive Relief in In re Continental Airlines, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Continental Airlines, Inc., Debtor. Eastern...
Limits on Inherent Court Sanctions for Attorneys: In re Prudential Insurance Co., 278 F.3d 175 (3d Cir. 2002)

Limits on Inherent Court Sanctions for Attorneys: In re Prudential Insurance Co., 278 F.3d 175 (3d Cir. 2002)

Date: Jan 25, 2002
Limits on Inherent Court Sanctions for Attorneys: In re Prudential Insurance Co., 278 F.3d 175 (3d Cir. 2002) Introduction IN RE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY America Sales Practice Litigation Agent...
Dual Motivation Analysis in Batson Challenges: The Gattis v. Snyder Decision

Dual Motivation Analysis in Batson Challenges: The Gattis v. Snyder Decision

Date: Jan 25, 2002
Dual Motivation Analysis in Batson Challenges: The Gattis v. Snyder Decision 1. Introduction The case of Robert Allen Gattis v. Robert Snyder, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals, Third...
Intent Matters: Third Circuit Limits Aggravated Felony Classification for Embezzlement under 8 U.S.C. §656 - Valansi v. Ashcroft

Intent Matters: Third Circuit Limits Aggravated Felony Classification for Embezzlement under 8 U.S.C. §656 - Valansi v. Ashcroft

Date: Jan 24, 2002
Intent Matters: Third Circuit Limits Aggravated Felony Classification for Embezzlement under 8 U.S.C. §656 - Valansi v. Ashcroft Introduction In the landmark case of Elanith Valansi v. John Ashcroft,...
Quiet Title Actions and Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Club Comanche, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin Islands

Quiet Title Actions and Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Club Comanche, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin Islands

Date: Jan 15, 2002
Quiet Title Actions and Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Club Comanche, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin Islands Introduction Club Comanche, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin Islands is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Limitations on Firearm Manufacturer Liability under Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act: City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

Affirmation of Limitations on Firearm Manufacturer Liability under Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act: City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

Date: Jan 12, 2002
Affirmation of Limitations on Firearm Manufacturer Liability under Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act Introduction The case City of Philadelphia; Guardian Civic League of Philadelphia; Aspira, Inc. of...
Reaffirmation of Strict Scienter Standards for Auditors under Section 10(b): In re IKON Office Solutions, Inc.

Reaffirmation of Strict Scienter Standards for Auditors under Section 10(b): In re IKON Office Solutions, Inc.

Date: Jan 12, 2002
Reaffirmation of Strict Scienter Standards for Auditors under Section 10(b): In re IKON Office Solutions, Inc. Introduction The case of In re IKON Office Solutions, Inc., 277 F.3d 658 (3d Cir. 2002),...
Enhancing Accountability in Public Office: Panarella v. United States Establishes New Standards for Honest Services Fraud

Enhancing Accountability in Public Office: Panarella v. United States Establishes New Standards for Honest Services Fraud

Date: Jan 12, 2002
Enhancing Accountability in Public Office: Panarella v. United States Establishes New Standards for Honest Services Fraud Introduction In United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr., 277 F.3d 678 (3d...
Understanding United States v. Robert U. Syme: Implications for Fraudulent Billing Practices in Health Care

Understanding United States v. Robert U. Syme: Implications for Fraudulent Billing Practices in Health Care

Date: Jan 8, 2002
Understanding United States v. Robert U. Syme: Implications for Fraudulent Billing Practices in Health Care Introduction United States of America v. Robert U. Syme, 276 F.3d 131 (3d Cir. 2002), is a...
Suppression of Evidence Due to Lacking Probable Cause in United States v. Zimmerman

Suppression of Evidence Due to Lacking Probable Cause in United States v. Zimmerman

Date: Jan 5, 2002
Suppression of Evidence Due to Lacking Probable Cause in United States v. Zimmerman Introduction United States v. Zimmerman, 277 F.3d 426 (3d Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Discretionary Interpretation under ERISA: The Significance of 'May' in Gritzer v. CBS, Inc.

Discretionary Interpretation under ERISA: The Significance of 'May' in Gritzer v. CBS, Inc.

Date: Jan 4, 2002
Discretionary Interpretation under ERISA: The Significance of 'May' in Gritzer v. CBS, Inc. Introduction The case of Gritzer et al. v. CBS, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Bennett v. Murphy: Third Circuit Adopts Saucier Two-Step Framework for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases

Bennett v. Murphy: Third Circuit Adopts Saucier Two-Step Framework for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases

Date: Jan 3, 2002
Bennett v. Murphy: Third Circuit Adopts Saucier Two-Step Framework for Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases Introduction Bennett v. Murphy is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Enhancing Juror Selection Integrity: A Comprehensive Analysis of RILEY v. TAYLOR

Enhancing Juror Selection Integrity: A Comprehensive Analysis of RILEY v. TAYLOR

Date: Dec 29, 2001
Enhancing Juror Selection Integrity: A Comprehensive Analysis of RILEY v. TAYLOR Introduction In RILEY v. TAYLOR; Brady, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed critical...
Chisolm v. McManimon: Third Circuit Overturns Summary Judgment on ADA Claims and Defines Sovereign Immunity for County Courts in Unified State Systems

Chisolm v. McManimon: Third Circuit Overturns Summary Judgment on ADA Claims and Defines Sovereign Immunity for County Courts in Unified State Systems

Date: Dec 29, 2001
Chisolm v. McManimon: Third Circuit Overturns Summary Judgment on ADA Claims and Defines Sovereign Immunity for County Courts in Unified State Systems Introduction In Ronald Chisolm, Appellant, v....
Third Circuit Upholds Philadelphia DA's Rearrest Policy in Stewart v. Abraham

Third Circuit Upholds Philadelphia DA's Rearrest Policy in Stewart v. Abraham

Date: Dec 27, 2001
Third Circuit Upholds Philadelphia DA's Rearrest Policy in Stewart v. Abraham Introduction Stewart v. Abraham is a landmark civil rights action adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert