Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Economic Loss Doctrine Applied to Consumer Fraud Claims under Pennsylvania's UTPCPL

Economic Loss Doctrine Applied to Consumer Fraud Claims under Pennsylvania's UTPCPL

Date: Apr 16, 2002
Economic Loss Doctrine Applied to Consumer Fraud Claims under Pennsylvania's UTPCPL Introduction In the case of Robert N. Werwinski, Jr.; Elizabeth C. Werwinski; Jean C. Cook; Donna Coffey; Joseph...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies as an Affirmative Defense under PLRA: Insights from Frederick T. Ray v. Kertes et al.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies as an Affirmative Defense under PLRA: Insights from Frederick T. Ray v. Kertes et al.

Date: Apr 4, 2002
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies as an Affirmative Defense under PLRA: Insights from Frederick T. Ray v. Kertes et al. Introduction Frederick T. Ray v. C.O. Kertes; C.O. Stolz; C.O. Reed; C.O....
Enhancing Jurisdictional Clarity in Settlement Dismissals: Shaffer v. GTE North, Inc.

Enhancing Jurisdictional Clarity in Settlement Dismissals: Shaffer v. GTE North, Inc.

Date: Mar 29, 2002
Enhancing Jurisdictional Clarity in Settlement Dismissals: Shaffer v. GTE North, Inc. Introduction In the pivotal case of Brenda L. Shaffer v. GTE North, Inc. (284 F.3d 500, 3rd Cir. 2002), the...
Evaluating Reasonable Suspicion: The Nelson Decision and the Reliability of Informant Tips

Evaluating Reasonable Suspicion: The Nelson Decision and the Reliability of Informant Tips

Date: Mar 27, 2002
Evaluating Reasonable Suspicion: The Nelson Decision and the Reliability of Informant Tips Introduction The case of United States of America v. Terrance Nelson, decided by the United States Court of...
Expanding Anti-Retaliation Protections: Third-Party Claims Under ADA Affirmed

Expanding Anti-Retaliation Protections: Third-Party Claims Under ADA Affirmed

Date: Mar 19, 2002
Expanding Anti-Retaliation Protections: Third-Party Claims Under ADA Affirmed Introduction The case of Gregory Fogleman v. Mercy Hospital, Inc. (283 F.3d 561) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in FHAA Discrimination Case: Lapid-Laurel v. Township of Scotch Plains

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in FHAA Discrimination Case: Lapid-Laurel v. Township of Scotch Plains

Date: Mar 16, 2002
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in FHAA Discrimination Case: Lapid-Laurel v. Township of Scotch Plains Introduction The case of LAPID-LAUREL, L.L.C.; John and Jane Doe, Appellants versus ZONING BOARD...
Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Free Exercise Rights in Designating Five Percent Nation as a Security Threat Group

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Free Exercise Rights in Designating Five Percent Nation as a Security Threat Group

Date: Mar 14, 2002
Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Free Exercise Rights in Designating Five Percent Nation as a Security Threat Group Introduction The case of Jael Fraise, Alexander Kettles, and John Harris v. James...
Finality and Appealability of Arbitration-Directing Orders Post-Green Tree and Fee Allocation Challenges

Finality and Appealability of Arbitration-Directing Orders Post-Green Tree and Fee Allocation Challenges

Date: Mar 14, 2002
Finality and Appealability of Arbitration-Directing Orders Post-Green Tree and Fee Allocation Challenges Introduction The case of Diane Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases adjudicated by the United States...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Prior Sexual Assault Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 415: Johnson v. Elk Lake School District

Clarifying the Admissibility of Prior Sexual Assault Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 415: Johnson v. Elk Lake School District

Date: Mar 2, 2002
Clarifying the Admissibility of Prior Sexual Assault Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 415: Johnson v. Elk Lake School District Introduction The case of Betsy Sue Johnson v. Elk Lake School...
Reaffirmation of Procedural Default and Exhaustion Doctrine in Cristin v. Brennan

Reaffirmation of Procedural Default and Exhaustion Doctrine in Cristin v. Brennan

Date: Feb 28, 2002
Reaffirmation of Procedural Default and Exhaustion Doctrine in Cristin v. Brennan Introduction In the landmark case of Martin Cristin aka Danny Stanton v. Edward Brennan, Superintendent; the Attorney...
Third Circuit Establishes Robust Federal Jurisdiction Over Complex MDL Class Actions

Third Circuit Establishes Robust Federal Jurisdiction Over Complex MDL Class Actions

Date: Feb 27, 2002
Third Circuit Establishes Robust Federal Jurisdiction Over Complex MDL Class Actions Introduction The case of In re DIET DRUGS (Phentermine, Fenfluramine, Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability...
Affirmation of Abstention Doctrine in State Disciplinary Proceedings: ZAHL v. Harper

Affirmation of Abstention Doctrine in State Disciplinary Proceedings: ZAHL v. Harper

Date: Feb 27, 2002
Affirmation of Abstention Doctrine in State Disciplinary Proceedings: ZAHL v. Harper Introduction The case of Kenneth ZAHL, Appellant, v. Douglas J. Harper addressed critical issues surrounding the...
Subordination of Breach of Contract Claims Under 11 U.S.C. § 510(b): In re Telegroup, Inc. Baroda Hill Investments, Ltd. Case Commentary

Subordination of Breach of Contract Claims Under 11 U.S.C. § 510(b): In re Telegroup, Inc. Baroda Hill Investments, Ltd. Case Commentary

Date: Feb 16, 2002
Subordination of Breach of Contract Claims Under 11 U.S.C. § 510(b): In re Telegroup, Inc. Baroda Hill Investments, Ltd. Case Commentary Introduction The case In re Telegroup, Inc. Baroda Hill...
Federal Rules Do Not Preempt State Malicious Abuse of Process Claims: U.S. Express Lines v. Higgins

Federal Rules Do Not Preempt State Malicious Abuse of Process Claims: U.S. Express Lines v. Higgins

Date: Feb 16, 2002
Federal Rules Do Not Preempt State Malicious Abuse of Process Claims: U.S. Express Lines v. Higgins Introduction The case U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. et al. v. Ann-Michele Higgins, Esq. et al. was...
Limiting the Scope of "Aggravated Felony" in Immigration Law: Insights from Da v. Gerbier

Limiting the Scope of "Aggravated Felony" in Immigration Law: Insights from Da v. Gerbier

Date: Feb 9, 2002
Limiting the Scope of "Aggravated Felony" in Immigration Law: Insights from Da v. Gerbier Introduction Da v. Gerbier, Appellant (280 F.3d 297) is a landmark decision by the United States Court of...
No Annual Fee Deception: Fleet Bank’s Violation of the Truth in Lending Act

No Annual Fee Deception: Fleet Bank’s Violation of the Truth in Lending Act

Date: Feb 9, 2002
No Annual Fee Deception: Fleet Bank’s Violation of the Truth in Lending Act Introduction The case of Paula E. Rossman v. Fleet Bank (R.I.) National Association, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Third Circuit Upholds Qualified and Absolute Immunity in §1983 Malicious Prosecution Case

Third Circuit Upholds Qualified and Absolute Immunity in §1983 Malicious Prosecution Case

Date: Feb 8, 2002
Third Circuit Upholds Qualified and Absolute Immunity in §1983 Malicious Prosecution Case Introduction In Christopher F. Donahue v. James Gavin, 280 F.3d 371 (3rd Cir. 2002), the United States Court...
Expanding the Boundaries of Associational and Third-Party Standing: Pennsylvania Psychiatric Society v. Green Spring Health Services

Expanding the Boundaries of Associational and Third-Party Standing: Pennsylvania Psychiatric Society v. Green Spring Health Services

Date: Feb 7, 2002
Expanding the Boundaries of Associational and Third-Party Standing: Pennsylvania Psychiatric Society v. Green Spring Health Services Introduction The case of Pennsylvania Psychiatric Society,...
Limitations on Rule 33 Motions: Codefendant Testimony and Newly Discovered Evidence in United States v. Jasin

Limitations on Rule 33 Motions: Codefendant Testimony and Newly Discovered Evidence in United States v. Jasin

Date: Feb 6, 2002
Limitations on Rule 33 Motions: Codefendant Testimony and Newly Discovered Evidence in United States v. Jasin Introduction United States v. Thomas P. Jasin, decided by the United States Court of...
Whitney v. Horn: Standards for Jury Instructions on Voluntary Intoxication and Counsel's Duty in Capital Cases

Whitney v. Horn: Standards for Jury Instructions on Voluntary Intoxication and Counsel's Duty in Capital Cases

Date: Feb 6, 2002
Whitney v. Horn: Standards for Jury Instructions on Voluntary Intoxication and Counsel's Duty in Capital Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Raymond Whitney v. Martin Horn, Commissioner,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert