Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Trade Dress Non-Functionality in Pharmaceutical Tablets: Shire US Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.

Trade Dress Non-Functionality in Pharmaceutical Tablets: Shire US Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.

Date: May 24, 2003
Trade Dress Non-Functionality in Pharmaceutical Tablets: Shire US Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc. Introduction Shire US Inc., Appellant v. Barr Laboratories Inc. (329 F.3d 348) is a pivotal case...
Credibility Determinations in Asylum Claims: Insights from Abdulrahman v. Ashcroft

Credibility Determinations in Asylum Claims: Insights from Abdulrahman v. Ashcroft

Date: May 22, 2003
Credibility Determinations in Asylum Claims: Insights from Abdulrahman v. Ashcroft Introduction Abdulrahman v. Ashcroft, 330 F.3d 587 (3d Cir. 2003), serves as a significant precedent in the realm of...
Establishing 'Particular Social Group' for Former Child Soldiers: Lukwago v. Ashcroft

Establishing 'Particular Social Group' for Former Child Soldiers: Lukwago v. Ashcroft

Date: May 15, 2003
Establishing 'Particular Social Group' for Former Child Soldiers: Lukwago v. Ashcroft Introduction Bernard Lukwago a/k/a Melvin Haft v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States,...
Affirmation of Strict Requirements for Municipal Liability in Police Use of Force Cases: Campbell v. City of Philadelphia

Affirmation of Strict Requirements for Municipal Liability in Police Use of Force Cases: Campbell v. City of Philadelphia

Date: May 10, 2003
Affirmation of Strict Requirements for Municipal Liability in Police Use of Force Cases: Campbell v. City of Philadelphia Introduction Campbell v. City of Philadelphia is a significant case...
Deferred Consideration of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Direct Appeal: United States v. Michael Thornton

Deferred Consideration of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Direct Appeal: United States v. Michael Thornton

Date: May 8, 2003
Deferred Consideration of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Direct Appeal: United States v. Michael Thornton Introduction The case of United States v. Michael Thornton, 327 F.3d 268 (3d Cir....
Severance of Royalty Rights in Bankruptcy Asset Sales: Insights from In re CellNet Data Systems, Inc.

Severance of Royalty Rights in Bankruptcy Asset Sales: Insights from In re CellNet Data Systems, Inc.

Date: May 1, 2003
Severance of Royalty Rights in Bankruptcy Asset Sales: Insights from In re CellNet Data Systems, Inc. Introduction The case of Schlumberger Resource Management Services, Inc. v. CellNet Data Systems,...
Third Circuit Affirms Standards for Attorney Fee Recovery under Bankruptcy Code §§ 549 and 550: In re Andrew E. Bressman

Third Circuit Affirms Standards for Attorney Fee Recovery under Bankruptcy Code §§ 549 and 550: In re Andrew E. Bressman

Date: Apr 26, 2003
Third Circuit Affirms Standards for Attorney Fee Recovery under Bankruptcy Code §§ 549 and 550: In re Andrew E. Bressman Introduction The case of In re: Andrew E. Bressman (327 F.3d 229), adjudicated...
Proper Filing Under AEDPA: Insights from Mar v. Merritt

Proper Filing Under AEDPA: Insights from Mar v. Merritt

Date: Apr 17, 2003
Proper Filing Under AEDPA: Insights from Mar v. Merritt Introduction Marvon Merritt, also known as Merrit Monroe, filed a petition for habeas corpus after being convicted of multiple crimes,...
Incentive Stock Option Plans Excluded from ERISA Coverage: Analysis of Oatway v. AIG

Incentive Stock Option Plans Excluded from ERISA Coverage: Analysis of Oatway v. AIG

Date: Apr 15, 2003
Incentive Stock Option Plans Excluded from ERISA Coverage: Analysis of Oatway v. AIG Introduction In the case of Derek J. Oatway v. American International Group, Inc., the appellant, Derek J. Oatway,...
Reefer v. Barnhart: Upholding ALJ Responsibilities in Pro Se Disability Claims

Reefer v. Barnhart: Upholding ALJ Responsibilities in Pro Se Disability Claims

Date: Apr 15, 2003
Reefer v. Barnhart: Upholding ALJ Responsibilities in Pro Se Disability Claims Introduction Laurel M. Reefer initiated a legal battle against Joanne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security,...
Ensuring Due Process in Asylum Adjudications: Lessons from Ezeagwuna v. Ashcroft

Ensuring Due Process in Asylum Adjudications: Lessons from Ezeagwuna v. Ashcroft

Date: Apr 15, 2003
Ensuring Due Process in Asylum Adjudications: Lessons from Ezeagwuna v. Ashcroft Introduction Glory Obianuju Ezeagwuna, a Cameroonian national, sought political asylum in the United States, alleging...
Third Circuit Rules §2255 Motions to Restore Appeal Rights Are Not 'Second or Successive' Under AEDPA

Third Circuit Rules §2255 Motions to Restore Appeal Rights Are Not 'Second or Successive' Under AEDPA

Date: Apr 11, 2003
Third Circuit Rules §2255 Motions to Restore Appeal Rights Are Not 'Second or Successive' Under AEDPA Introduction In re: Ilori Babajide Olabode, 325 F.3d 166 (3d Cir. 2003), addresses a pivotal...
Clarifying Prosecutorial Vouching and Sentencing Guideline Application: Detailed Commentary on United States v. Brennan, 326 F.3d 176

Clarifying Prosecutorial Vouching and Sentencing Guideline Application: Detailed Commentary on United States v. Brennan, 326 F.3d 176

Date: Apr 8, 2003
Clarifying Prosecutorial Vouching and Sentencing Guideline Application: Detailed Commentary on United States v. Brennan, 326 F.3d 176 Introduction In United States of America v. Robert E. Brennan,...
Severability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Discrimination Cases: Spinetti v. Service Corporation International

Severability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Discrimination Cases: Spinetti v. Service Corporation International

Date: Apr 1, 2003
Severability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Discrimination Cases: Spinetti v. Service Corporation International Introduction The case of Maryann Spinetti v. Service Corporation International...
Third Circuit Affirms §502(b)(6) Does Not Impair Landlord's Claims for Voting in Chapter 11 Plans

Third Circuit Affirms §502(b)(6) Does Not Impair Landlord's Claims for Voting in Chapter 11 Plans

Date: Mar 29, 2003
Third Circuit Affirms §502(b)(6) Does Not Impair Landlord's Claims for Voting in Chapter 11 Plans Introduction The case of Sheldon H. Solow, d/b/a Solow Building Company v. PPI Enterprises (U.S.),...
IQ Score Consideration in SSI Mental Retardation Claims: Insights from Markle v. Barnhart

IQ Score Consideration in SSI Mental Retardation Claims: Insights from Markle v. Barnhart

Date: Mar 27, 2003
IQ Score Consideration in SSI Mental Retardation Claims: Insights from Markle v. Barnhart Introduction Markle v. Barnhart is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Exclusionary Conduct Sustains Sherman Act §2 Monopolization: LePage's Inc. v. 3M

Exclusionary Conduct Sustains Sherman Act §2 Monopolization: LePage's Inc. v. 3M

Date: Mar 26, 2003
Exclusionary Conduct Sustains Sherman Act §2 Monopolization: LePage's Inc. v. 3M Introduction In the landmark case of LePage's Incorporated; LePage's Management Company, L.L.C. v. 3M (Minnesota...
The Third Circuit Upholds Qualified Immunity in Free Exercise Claims: Sutton v. Rasheed

The Third Circuit Upholds Qualified Immunity in Free Exercise Claims: Sutton v. Rasheed

Date: Mar 20, 2003
Qualified Immunity Prevails in Free Exercise Claims: A Detailed Analysis of Sutton v. Rasheed Introduction Sutton v. Rasheed is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Standing Requirements in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: Storino v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach

Standing Requirements in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: Storino v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach

Date: Mar 19, 2003
Standing Requirements in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: Storino v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach Introduction Storino v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Equitable Tolling of Statutory Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Charles Brown Case

Equitable Tolling of Statutory Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Charles Brown Case

Date: Mar 18, 2003
Equitable Tolling of Statutory Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: The Charles Brown Case Introduction The case of Charles Brown v. Robert Shannon, et al., reported in 322 F.3d 768, deliberated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert