Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Third Circuit Establishes Modified De Novo Review Standard in IDEA Appeals: S.H. v. Newark

Third Circuit Establishes Modified De Novo Review Standard in IDEA Appeals: S.H. v. Newark

Date: Jul 15, 2003
Third Circuit Establishes Modified De Novo Review Standard in IDEA Appeals: S.H. v. Newark Introduction The case of S.H., Individually and on Behalf of I.H. v. State-Operated School District of...
Withdrawing Guilty Pleas and Competency Hearings: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Donald JONES

Withdrawing Guilty Pleas and Competency Hearings: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Donald JONES

Date: Jul 15, 2003
Withdrawing Guilty Pleas and Competency Hearings: Insights from UNITED STATES v. Donald JONES (336 F.3d 245) Introduction United States of America v. Donald Jones is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Impact of Prison Mail Delays on Timeliness of §2255 Appeals: United States v. Fiorelli

Impact of Prison Mail Delays on Timeliness of §2255 Appeals: United States v. Fiorelli

Date: Jul 10, 2003
Impact of Prison Mail Delays on Timeliness of §2255 Appeals: United States v. Fiorelli Introduction In United States v. Fiorelli, 337 F.3d 282 (3d Cir. 2003), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Third Circuit Rules that Summary Plan Description Controls Over Plan Documents in ERISA Benefits Claims

Third Circuit Rules that Summary Plan Description Controls Over Plan Documents in ERISA Benefits Claims

Date: Jul 3, 2003
Third Circuit Rules that Summary Plan Description Controls Over Plan Documents in ERISA Benefits Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Burstein et al. v. Retirement Account Plan for Employees...
Third Circuit Vacates BIA's Asylum Denial Due to Insufficient Credibility Findings in Kayembe Case

Third Circuit Vacates BIA's Asylum Denial Due to Insufficient Credibility Findings in Kayembe Case

Date: Jul 2, 2003
Third Circuit Vacates BIA's Asylum Denial Due to Insufficient Credibility Findings in Kayembe Case Introduction The case of Oscar Kayembe v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States (334...
Comity and Federalism Uphold State Grand Jury Transcript Confidentiality: Camiolo v. State Farm

Comity and Federalism Uphold State Grand Jury Transcript Confidentiality: Camiolo v. State Farm

Date: Jul 1, 2003
Comity and Federalism Uphold State Grand Jury Transcript Confidentiality: Camiolo v. State Farm Introduction In the matter of Paul Camiolo v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. (334 F.3d 345), the...
Limits on Admissible Evidence in Insurance Bad Faith Litigation: Insights from W.V. Realty Inc. v. Northern Insurance Company

Limits on Admissible Evidence in Insurance Bad Faith Litigation: Insights from W.V. Realty Inc. v. Northern Insurance Company

Date: Jun 28, 2003
Limits on Admissible Evidence in Insurance Bad Faith Litigation: Insights from W.V. Realty Inc. v. Northern Insurance Company Introduction W.V. Realty Inc.; New Montage Manor, Inc. v. Northern...
Essential Job Functions and the Breakdown of the ADA Interactive Process: Conneen v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.

Essential Job Functions and the Breakdown of the ADA Interactive Process: Conneen v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.

Date: Jun 28, 2003
Essential Job Functions and the Breakdown of the ADA Interactive Process: Conneen v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. Introduction In the landmark case of Margaret D. Conneen v. MBNA America Bank, N.A., the...
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards and the Validity of Arbitration Agreements: A New Precedent

Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards and the Validity of Arbitration Agreements: A New Precedent

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards and the Validity of Arbitration Agreements: A New Precedent Introduction The case of China Minmetals Materials Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. Chi Mei...
ERISA Fiduciary Duty and Disclosure Requirements: An In-Depth Analysis of Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.

ERISA Fiduciary Duty and Disclosure Requirements: An In-Depth Analysis of Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.

Date: Jun 24, 2003
ERISA Fiduciary Duty and Disclosure Requirements: An In-Depth Analysis of Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc. Introduction Donna Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc. is a pivotal case...
Apprendi v. Swinton: Retroactive Application in Collateral Review Affirmed

Apprendi v. Swinton: Retroactive Application in Collateral Review Affirmed

Date: Jun 24, 2003
Apprendi v. Swinton: Retroactive Application in Collateral Review Affirmed Introduction The case of United States of America v. Andre Swinton, 333 F.3d 481 (3d Cir. 2003), presents a pivotal...
Zubeda v. Ashcroft: Establishing Precedent on Torture Relief in Immigration Law

Zubeda v. Ashcroft: Establishing Precedent on Torture Relief in Immigration Law

Date: Jun 24, 2003
Zubeda v. Ashcroft: Establishing Precedent on Torture Relief in Immigration Law Introduction Takky Zubeda v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States is a seminal case decided by the...
Binding Arbitration Clause in International Commercial Contracts: Analysis of Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy

Binding Arbitration Clause in International Commercial Contracts: Analysis of Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy

Date: Jun 21, 2003
Binding Arbitration Clause in International Commercial Contracts: Analysis of Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy Introduction The case of Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy presents...
Ripeness of First Amendment Challenges to Municipal Sign Ordinances: Peachlum v. City of York

Ripeness of First Amendment Challenges to Municipal Sign Ordinances: Peachlum v. City of York

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Ripeness of First Amendment Challenges to Municipal Sign Ordinances: Peachlum v. City of York Introduction Peachlum v. City of York is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Prior Juvenile Adjudications and the ACCA: United States v. Lester Jones - A New Legal Precedent

Prior Juvenile Adjudications and the ACCA: United States v. Lester Jones - A New Legal Precedent

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Prior Juvenile Adjudications and the ACCA: United States v. Lester Jones - A New Legal Precedent Introduction United States of America v. Lester Jones, 332 F.3d 688 (3d Cir. 2003), presents a pivotal...
Piercing the Corporate Veil in ERISA Context: Trustees v. Lutyk

Piercing the Corporate Veil in ERISA Context: Trustees v. Lutyk

Date: Jun 12, 2003
Piercing the Corporate Veil in ERISA Context: Trustees v. Lutyk Introduction Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit and Educational Funds v. Andrew Lutyk is a pivotal case...
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections: Third Circuit Clarifies Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and 'Fighting Words' in Stop and Arrest Scenarios

Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections: Third Circuit Clarifies Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and 'Fighting Words' in Stop and Arrest Scenarios

Date: Jun 6, 2003
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections: Third Circuit Clarifies Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and 'Fighting Words' in Stop and Arrest Scenarios Introduction In the landmark case of Steven...
Establishing Creditor Fraud Against Legal Counsel: Morganroth v. Norris, McLaughlin, et al.

Establishing Creditor Fraud Against Legal Counsel: Morganroth v. Norris, McLaughlin, et al.

Date: May 31, 2003
Establishing Creditor Fraud Against Legal Counsel: Morganroth v. Norris, McLaughlin, et al. Introduction The case of Morganroth Morganroth, a Michigan partnership; Mayer Morganroth, Esq. v. Norris,...
Derivative Standing for Creditors' Committees in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: A 3rd Circuit Analysis

Derivative Standing for Creditors' Committees in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: A 3rd Circuit Analysis

Date: May 30, 2003
Derivative Standing for Creditors' Committees in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: A 3rd Circuit Analysis Introduction In the complex realm of bankruptcy law, the role of creditors' committees is pivotal in...
Reaffirming Motion to Dismiss Rights in Civil Forfeiture Proceedings: Integrating Supplemental and Federal Civil Rules

Reaffirming Motion to Dismiss Rights in Civil Forfeiture Proceedings: Integrating Supplemental and Federal Civil Rules

Date: May 29, 2003
Reaffirming Motion to Dismiss Rights in Civil Forfeiture Proceedings: Integrating Supplemental and Federal Civil Rules Introduction In the landmark case titled UNITED STATES of America v. Kesten...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert