Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Armstrong v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital: A New Precedent in Failure to Accommodate Disability Claims

Armstrong v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital: A New Precedent in Failure to Accommodate Disability Claims

Date: Jan 31, 2006
Armstrong v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital: A New Precedent in Failure to Accommodate Disability Claims Introduction The case of Arnie Armstrong v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital (438 F.3d...
Unambiguous Policy Language: Enforcing Business Use Exclusions in Insurance Coverage – Canal Ins. Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Unambiguous Policy Language: Enforcing Business Use Exclusions in Insurance Coverage – Canal Ins. Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Date: Jan 28, 2006
Unambiguous Policy Language: Enforcing Business Use Exclusions in Insurance Coverage – Canal Ins. Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London Introduction Canal Insurance Company v. Underwriters at Lloyd's...
ERISA Statute of Limitations Affirmed: Limitations on Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Ranke v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc.

ERISA Statute of Limitations Affirmed: Limitations on Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Ranke v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc.

Date: Jan 28, 2006
ERISA Statute of Limitations Affirmed: Limitations on Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Ranke v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. Introduction Ranke v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Burden of Proof Post-Schaffer in IDEA Educational Placement Disputes

Affirmation of Burden of Proof Post-Schaffer in IDEA Educational Placement Disputes

Date: Jan 24, 2006
Affirmation of Burden of Proof Post-Schaffer in IDEA Educational Placement Disputes Introduction The case of L.E.; E.S., indi v. Ramsey Board of Education (435 F.3d 384) addresses pivotal issues...
Mandatory Abstention in Removed Bankruptcy-Related Cases: George P. Stoe v. William E. Flaherty et al.

Mandatory Abstention in Removed Bankruptcy-Related Cases: George P. Stoe v. William E. Flaherty et al.

Date: Jan 24, 2006
Mandatory Abstention in Removed Bankruptcy-Related Cases: George P. Stoe v. William E. Flaherty et al. Introduction The appellate case George P. Stoe v. William E. Flaherty et al., 436 F.3d 209 (3d...
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Settlement Approval Standards and Contribution Claim Bar under the Illinois Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act in In re Nutraquest, Inc.

Affirmation of Bankruptcy Settlement Approval Standards and Contribution Claim Bar under the Illinois Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act in In re Nutraquest, Inc.

Date: Jan 21, 2006
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Settlement Approval Standards and Contribution Claim Bar under the Illinois Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act in In re Nutraquest, Inc. Introduction The case In re...
Third Circuit Upholds REAL ID Act: Impact on Asylum Application Timeliness and Judicial Review

Third Circuit Upholds REAL ID Act: Impact on Asylum Application Timeliness and Judicial Review

Date: Jan 20, 2006
Third Circuit Upholds REAL ID Act: Impact on Asylum Application Timeliness and Judicial Review Introduction In the case of Ellyana Sukwanputra; Yulius Sukwanputra v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney...
Protected Speech in Retaliatory Termination: Insights from Dr. Springer v. Henry

Protected Speech in Retaliatory Termination: Insights from Dr. Springer v. Henry

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Protected Speech in Retaliatory Termination: Insights from Dr. Springer v. Henry Introduction The case of Dr. David T. Springer v. Renata J. Henry presents a pivotal examination of the interplay...
AEDPA Tolling Requirements Reinforced in Satterfield v. Johnson

AEDPA Tolling Requirements Reinforced in Satterfield v. Johnson

Date: Jan 18, 2006
AEDPA Tolling Requirements Reinforced in Satterfield v. Johnson Introduction The case of Paul Satterfield v. Philip L. Johnson; the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; the Attorney...
Inquiry Notice and Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: Insights from Benak v. Alliance Capital Management

Inquiry Notice and Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: Insights from Benak v. Alliance Capital Management

Date: Jan 14, 2006
Inquiry Notice and Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: Insights from Benak v. Alliance Capital Management Introduction The legal landscape governing securities fraud claims is continually...
Third Circuit Reverses Denial of Rule 15(c) Relation Back in Edward Arthur v. Maersk

Third Circuit Reverses Denial of Rule 15(c) Relation Back in Edward Arthur v. Maersk

Date: Jan 14, 2006
Third Circuit Reverses Denial of Rule 15(c) Relation Back in Edward Arthur v. Maersk Introduction In Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc., 434 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 2006), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Retaliatory Discharge Case under Title VII and PHRA

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Retaliatory Discharge Case under Title VII and PHRA

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Retaliatory Discharge Case under Title VII and PHRA Introduction Timothy A. Slagle, a former correctional officer at the Clarion County Jail in Pennsylvania,...
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from Mintze v. American General Financial Services

Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from Mintze v. American General Financial Services

Date: Jan 11, 2006
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from Mintze v. American General Financial Services Introduction The case of In re: Ethel Marie Mintze, Debtor. Ethel Marie...
Recharacterization of Debt as Equity in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re SubMicron Systems Corp.

Recharacterization of Debt as Equity in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re SubMicron Systems Corp.

Date: Jan 7, 2006
Recharacterization of Debt as Equity in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re SubMicron Systems Corp. Introduction The case of In re SubMicron Systems Corporation, et al, Debtors v. KB...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation: McKEE & Jones v. Hart et al.

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation: McKEE & Jones v. Hart et al.

Date: Jan 7, 2006
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation: McKEE & Jones v. Hart et al. Introduction In the appellate case Dwight L. McKEE; Allen L. Jones v. Henry Hart; Wesley Rish; Albert...
Open Plea Options and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from United States v. Brian Booth

Open Plea Options and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from United States v. Brian Booth

Date: Dec 30, 2005
Open Plea Options and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from United States v. Brian Booth Introduction United States v. Brian Booth, 432 F.3d 542 (3d Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case...
Reinforcement of the Absolute Priority Rule in Bankruptcy Reorganizations: In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Reinforcement of the Absolute Priority Rule in Bankruptcy Reorganizations: In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Date: Dec 30, 2005
Reinforcement of the Absolute Priority Rule in Bankruptcy Reorganizations: In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 432 F.3d 507 (3d...
Enhanced Standards for Corroboration and Credibility in Asylum Proceedings: Insights from Chen v. Gonzales

Enhanced Standards for Corroboration and Credibility in Asylum Proceedings: Insights from Chen v. Gonzales

Date: Dec 30, 2005
Enhanced Standards for Corroboration and Credibility in Asylum Proceedings: Insights from Chen v. Gonzales Introduction Chen v. Gonzales, 434 F.3d 212 (3d Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Third Circuit Upholds Distinction Between Direct and Reverse Confusion Claims in Trademark Infringement Cases

Affirmation of Third Circuit Upholds Distinction Between Direct and Reverse Confusion Claims in Trademark Infringement Cases

Date: Dec 23, 2005
Affirmation of Third Circuit Upholds Distinction Between Direct and Reverse Confusion Claims in Trademark Infringement Cases Introduction The case of Freedom Card, Inc.; Urban Television Network,...
Distinguishing Vacated Convictions for Immigration Eligibility: Pinho v. Gonzales

Distinguishing Vacated Convictions for Immigration Eligibility: Pinho v. Gonzales

Date: Dec 21, 2005
Distinguishing Vacated Convictions for Immigration Eligibility: Pinho v. Gonzales Introduction Pinho v. Gonzales is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert