Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Internet as Interstate Commerce Channel and Upholding Mandatory Minimums in MacEwan v. USA

Internet as Interstate Commerce Channel and Upholding Mandatory Minimums in MacEwan v. USA

Date: Apr 6, 2006
Internet as Interstate Commerce Channel and Upholding Mandatory Minimums in MacEwan v. USA Introduction The case of United States of America v. James E. MacEwan adjudicated by the United States Court...
Third Circuit Recognizes Prevailing Party Status for IDEA Attorneys' Fees in Consent Decrees

Third Circuit Recognizes Prevailing Party Status for IDEA Attorneys' Fees in Consent Decrees

Date: Apr 6, 2006
Third Circuit Recognizes Prevailing Party Status for IDEA Attorneys' Fees in Consent Decrees Introduction In the case of P.N., an infant, indi v. Clementon Board of Education, Appellants P.N. and his...
Third Circuit Establishes Reasonable Suspicion from General Marijuana Odor in Terry Stops

Third Circuit Establishes Reasonable Suspicion from General Marijuana Odor in Terry Stops

Date: Apr 6, 2006
Third Circuit Establishes Reasonable Suspicion from General Marijuana Odor in Terry Stops Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Ramos; Samuel Acosta (443 F.3d 304) adjudicated...
Affirmation of 'State-Created Danger' Doctrine in Bright v. Westmoreland County

Affirmation of 'State-Created Danger' Doctrine in Bright v. Westmoreland County

Date: Apr 5, 2006
Affirmation of 'State-Created Danger' Doctrine in Bright v. Westmoreland County Introduction The case of John Bright, Individually and in his capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Annette...
Procedural Defaults and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of James Robert Tice's Habeas Corpus Petition

Procedural Defaults and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of James Robert Tice's Habeas Corpus Petition

Date: Apr 1, 2006
Procedural Defaults and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of James Robert Tice's Habeas Corpus Petition Introduction The case of James Robert Tice v. Harry Wilson, adjudicated by the United...
Ripeness Doctrine in Facial Constitutional Challenges to Zoning Ordinances: Insights from County Concrete Corp. v. Township of Roxbury

Ripeness Doctrine in Facial Constitutional Challenges to Zoning Ordinances: Insights from County Concrete Corp. v. Township of Roxbury

Date: Apr 1, 2006
Ripeness Doctrine in Facial Constitutional Challenges to Zoning Ordinances: Insights from County Concrete Corp. v. Township of Roxbury Introduction County Concrete Corporation; J.C. Soil Gravel, LLC;...
Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions Under Conjunctive Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §1344

Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions Under Conjunctive Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §1344

Date: Mar 25, 2006
Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions Under Conjunctive Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §1344 Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Paul J. Leahy, along with co-defendants Timothy Smith...
Reversing Summary Judgment: Ownership and Protection of Family Business Trademarks

Reversing Summary Judgment: Ownership and Protection of Family Business Trademarks

Date: Mar 24, 2006
Reversing Summary Judgment: Ownership and Protection of Family Business Trademarks Introduction Doeblers' Pennsylvania Hybrids, Inc. v. Taylor Doebler, III is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodation: Insights from Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA

Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodation: Insights from Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA

Date: Mar 21, 2006
Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodation: Insights from Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA Introduction Janet M. Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA is a significant case decided by the United...
Third Circuit Reinforces Morgan's Discrete Acts Doctrine in §1983 Retaliation Claims

Third Circuit Reinforces Morgan's Discrete Acts Doctrine in §1983 Retaliation Claims

Date: Mar 14, 2006
Third Circuit Reinforces Morgan's Discrete Acts Doctrine in §1983 Retaliation Claims Introduction In James D. O'Connor; Jeannette C. O'Connor, Appellants v. City of Newark; City of Newark Police...
Political Affiliation Not a Cognizable Class under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): Analysis of Farber v. City of Paterson

Political Affiliation Not a Cognizable Class under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): Analysis of Farber v. City of Paterson

Date: Mar 9, 2006
Political Affiliation Not a Cognizable Class under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3): Analysis of Farber v. City of Paterson Introduction The case of Roberta Farber v. City of Paterson addresses significant...
Clarifying Pleading Standards for Securities Act Claims: In re Suprema Specialties, Inc. Securities Litigation

Clarifying Pleading Standards for Securities Act Claims: In re Suprema Specialties, Inc. Securities Litigation

Date: Feb 24, 2006
Clarifying Pleading Standards for Securities Act Claims: In re Suprema Specialties, Inc. Securities Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of In re: Suprema Specialties, Inc. Securities...
Affirmation of Conviction and Upholding of Speedy Trial Act and Second Amendment Provisions in United States v. Willaman

Affirmation of Conviction and Upholding of Speedy Trial Act and Second Amendment Provisions in United States v. Willaman

Date: Feb 18, 2006
Affirmation of Conviction and Upholding of Speedy Trial Act and Second Amendment Provisions in United States v. Willaman Introduction In United States v. Terrance Ross Willaman, 437 F.3d 354 (3d Cir....
Establishing Reasonableness Review Under 18 U.S.C. §3742(a): Insights from United States v. Lydia Cooper

Establishing Reasonableness Review Under 18 U.S.C. §3742(a): Insights from United States v. Lydia Cooper

Date: Feb 15, 2006
Establishing Reasonableness Review Under 18 U.S.C. §3742(a): Insights from United States v. Lydia Cooper Introduction The case of United States v. Lydia Cooper, heard by the United States Court of...
Affirming Ancillary Jurisdiction in Garnishment Actions under Indemnification Agreements: A Commentary on IFC Interconsult, AG v. Safeguard International Partners, LLC

Affirming Ancillary Jurisdiction in Garnishment Actions under Indemnification Agreements: A Commentary on IFC Interconsult, AG v. Safeguard International Partners, LLC

Date: Feb 14, 2006
Affirming Ancillary Jurisdiction in Garnishment Actions under Indemnification Agreements: A Commentary on IFC Interconsult, AG v. Safeguard International Partners, LLC Introduction The case of IFC...
Exigent Circumstances Doctrine Reinforced: United States v. Terrance Coles

Exigent Circumstances Doctrine Reinforced: United States v. Terrance Coles

Date: Feb 10, 2006
Exigent Circumstances Doctrine Reinforced: United States v. Terrance Coles Introduction United States of America v. Terrance Coles, 437 F.3d 361 (3d Cir. 2006), addresses the applicability of the...
Qualified Immunity and Jury Determination of Disputed Motive in First Amendment Claims: Monteiro v. City of Elizabeth

Qualified Immunity and Jury Determination of Disputed Motive in First Amendment Claims: Monteiro v. City of Elizabeth

Date: Feb 9, 2006
Qualified Immunity and Jury Determination of Disputed Motive in First Amendment Claims: Monteiro v. City of Elizabeth Introduction Armenio T. Monteiro v. City of Elizabeth is a landmark decision by...
Third Circuit Clarifies DSHEA's De Novo Provision: Not Applicable to Private APA Challenges Against Agency Rulemaking

Third Circuit Clarifies DSHEA's De Novo Provision: Not Applicable to Private APA Challenges Against Agency Rulemaking

Date: Feb 8, 2006
Third Circuit Clarifies DSHEA's De Novo Provision: Not Applicable to Private APA Challenges Against Agency Rulemaking Introduction NVE Inc. v. Department of Health and Human Services is a pivotal...
Expanding Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jensen v. US Postal Service

Expanding Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jensen v. US Postal Service

Date: Feb 1, 2006
Expanding Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jensen v. US Postal Service Introduction In the landmark case Anna M. Jensen v. Jack E. Potter, Postmaster General, US Postal...
Limitations on Successor Liability under Asset Purchase Agreements: A Comprehensive Analysis of BERG CHILLING SYSTEMS, INC. v. HULL CORPoration; SP Industries, Inc.

Limitations on Successor Liability under Asset Purchase Agreements: A Comprehensive Analysis of BERG CHILLING SYSTEMS, INC. v. HULL CORPoration; SP Industries, Inc.

Date: Feb 1, 2006
Limitations on Successor Liability under Asset Purchase Agreements: A Comprehensive Analysis of BERG CHILLING SYSTEMS, INC. v. HULL CORPoration; SP Industries, Inc. Introduction The judicial...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert