Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

Date: May 9, 2025
AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program Introduction In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Secretary, United States Department of...
Actual Loss Over Intended Loss and Victim Definition in USSG §2B1.1 – United States v. Barkers-Woode

Actual Loss Over Intended Loss and Victim Definition in USSG §2B1.1 – United States v. Barkers-Woode

Date: May 8, 2025
Actual Loss Over Intended Loss and Victim Definition in USSG §2B1.1 Introduction United States v. Patrick Barkers-Woode and United States v. Nana Mensah, decided May 7, 2025 by the Third Circuit,...
Requiring Actual Loss for Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. §2B1.1

Requiring Actual Loss for Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. §2B1.1

Date: May 8, 2025
Requiring Actual Loss for Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. §2B1.1 Introduction The consolidated appeals in United States v. Patrick Barkers-Woode and United States v. Nana Mensah arose from a...
Affirming Upward Variance for Straw Firearm Purchases to Deter Gang-Related Gun Violence

Affirming Upward Variance for Straw Firearm Purchases to Deter Gang-Related Gun Violence

Date: May 8, 2025
Affirming Upward Variance for Straw Firearm Purchases to Deter Gang-Related Gun Violence Introduction In United States v. Jordan Harmon, No. 24-1797 (3d Cir. May 7, 2025), the Third Circuit addressed...
Consent-Based Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Appeals: §636(c) Empowerment

Consent-Based Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Appeals: §636(c) Empowerment

Date: May 8, 2025
Consent-Based Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Appeals: §636(c) Empowerment 1. Introduction This case, In re: MTE Holdings LLC, arose from a dispute over oil-and-gas royalties between...
Objective Reasonableness in Traffic Stops and Consent Searches: United States v. Terry

Objective Reasonableness in Traffic Stops and Consent Searches: United States v. Terry

Date: May 7, 2025
Objective Reasonableness in Traffic Stops and Consent Searches: United States v. Terry Introduction United States v. John T. Terry (3d Cir. 2025) arises from a routine Pennsylvania Turnpike traffic...
Furnisher’s Duty to Conduct Reasonable Reinvestigation Under FCRA §1681s-2(b)

Furnisher’s Duty to Conduct Reasonable Reinvestigation Under FCRA §1681s-2(b)

Date: May 7, 2025
Furnisher’s Duty to Conduct Reasonable Reinvestigation Under FCRA §1681s-2(b) Introduction Michael and Andrew Ritz ("Plaintiffs") leased a vehicle that Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation ("Nissan")...
Establishing Cat’s Paw Liability for Gender Discrimination and Retaliation in Academic Contract Renewals

Establishing Cat’s Paw Liability for Gender Discrimination and Retaliation in Academic Contract Renewals

Date: May 6, 2025
Establishing Cat’s Paw Liability for Gender Discrimination and Retaliation in Academic Contract Renewals Introduction In Nonna Y. Sorokina v. The College of New Jersey, a panel of the United States...
Historical Hallmarks Standard for Establishment Clause in Public School Curriculum

Historical Hallmarks Standard for Establishment Clause in Public School Curriculum

Date: May 6, 2025
Historical Hallmarks Standard for Establishment Clause in Public School Curriculum Introduction Libby Hilsenrath v. School District of the Chathams, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Harmless Allocution Error in Unlawful Reentry Sentencing: Clarifying Plain Error Review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32

Harmless Allocution Error in Unlawful Reentry Sentencing: Clarifying Plain Error Review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32

Date: May 3, 2025
Harmless Allocution Error in Unlawful Reentry Sentencing: Clarifying Plain Error Review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 Introduction This commentary examines United States v. Rudys Osvaldo Torres, No....
Probable Cause Suffices for Pre-Revocation Detention: Limits of Due-Process in Probation Revocation

Probable Cause Suffices for Pre-Revocation Detention: Limits of Due-Process in Probation Revocation

Date: May 3, 2025
Probable Cause Suffices for Pre-Revocation Detention: Limits of Due-Process in Probation Revocation Introduction In Dion Horton v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos (3d Cir. 2025), a panel of the...
Physician’s Duty Under FTCA: No Liability for Emotional Distress from Treatment-Related Discharge Threat

Physician’s Duty Under FTCA: No Liability for Emotional Distress from Treatment-Related Discharge Threat

Date: May 3, 2025
Physician’s Duty Under FTCA: No Liability for Emotional Distress from Treatment-Related Discharge Threat Introduction In David D. Richardson v. United States, the Third Circuit addressed whether a...
Defining Official-Duty Speech and Whistleblower Standards in Peck v. Bolognone

Defining Official-Duty Speech and Whistleblower Standards in Peck v. Bolognone

Date: May 2, 2025
Defining Official-Duty Speech and Whistleblower Standards in Peck v. Bolognone Introduction Peck v. Bolognone is a Third Circuit decision addressing the limits of First Amendment protection for...
Clarifying Anders Review Standards and Restitution Obligations in CSAM Plea Agreements

Clarifying Anders Review Standards and Restitution Obligations in CSAM Plea Agreements

Date: May 2, 2025
Clarifying Anders Review Standards and Restitution Obligations in CSAM Plea Agreements Introduction United States v. Luke Shager (3d Cir. May 1, 2025) is an appeal from a 262-month sentence and...
Reinforcing Rule 9(b) Particularity in False Claims Act Qui Tam Suits

Reinforcing Rule 9(b) Particularity in False Claims Act Qui Tam Suits

Date: May 2, 2025
Reinforcing Rule 9(b) Particularity in False Claims Act Qui Tam Suits Introduction The Third Circuit’s decision in John Collado v. Bracco USA, Inc., No. 24-1668 (3d Cir. May 1, 2025), clarifies and...
Rigorous Application of Comparator Evidence and Discovery Diligence in Title VII Summary Judgment

Rigorous Application of Comparator Evidence and Discovery Diligence in Title VII Summary Judgment

Date: May 1, 2025
Rigorous Application of Comparator Evidence and Discovery Diligence in Title VII Summary Judgment Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s decision in Deborah Bennett v. SEPTA, which...
Rubinstein v. Bank of America: Clarifying RICO Accrual and Equitable Tolling in Mortgage Fraud Claims

Rubinstein v. Bank of America: Clarifying RICO Accrual and Equitable Tolling in Mortgage Fraud Claims

Date: May 1, 2025
Rubinstein v. Bank of America: Clarifying RICO Accrual and Equitable Tolling in Mortgage Fraud Claims Introduction In Rubinstein v. Bank of America NA, the Third Circuit addressed a protracted...
Res Judicata and the Timeliness of Rule 60(b) Relief: Third Circuit Clarifies Preclusive Effect

Res Judicata and the Timeliness of Rule 60(b) Relief: Third Circuit Clarifies Preclusive Effect

Date: May 1, 2025
Res Judicata and the Timeliness of Rule 60(b) Relief: Third Circuit Clarifies Preclusive Effect Introduction The Third Circuit’s decision in Neil Binder v. Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC (3d Cir....
Recognition of PREA-Complaint Retaliation and Limits of Sovereign Immunity for Voyeuristic Tort in Williamson v. Bolton

Recognition of PREA-Complaint Retaliation and Limits of Sovereign Immunity for Voyeuristic Tort in Williamson v. Bolton

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Recognition of PREA-Complaint Retaliation and Limits of Sovereign Immunity for Voyeuristic Tort in Williamson v. Bolton Introduction In Bobby Williamson v. Brian Bolton, No. 24-2246 (3d Cir. Apr. 29,...
Ronaldo Lopez De Leon v. Attorney General: Establishing Nexus Requirements for Kinship-Based Particular Social Groups in Asylum and Withholding Claims

Ronaldo Lopez De Leon v. Attorney General: Establishing Nexus Requirements for Kinship-Based Particular Social Groups in Asylum and Withholding Claims

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Ronaldo Lopez De Leon v. Attorney General: Establishing Nexus Requirements for Kinship-Based Particular Social Groups in Asylum and Withholding Claims Introduction In Ronaldo Lopez De Leon et al. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert