Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Expanding Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Rule 15(c) and Procedural Bar Exceptions in Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional Services

Expanding Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Rule 15(c) and Procedural Bar Exceptions in Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional Services

Date: Dec 22, 2000
Expanding Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Rule 15(c) and Procedural Bar Exceptions in Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional Services Introduction Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional Services (235 F.3d...
Constructive Discharge: Accrual of Claims upon Employee’s Notice of Resignation – Mary Flaherty v. Metromail Corp.

Constructive Discharge: Accrual of Claims upon Employee’s Notice of Resignation – Mary Flaherty v. Metromail Corp.

Date: Dec 20, 2000
Constructive Discharge: Accrual of Claims upon Employee’s Notice of Resignation – Mary Flaherty v. Metromail Corp. Introduction In Mary Flaherty v. Metromail Corporation, 235 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2000),...
Enhancing Rule 11 Enforcement: Insights from GURARY v. WINEHOUSE and Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc.

Enhancing Rule 11 Enforcement: Insights from GURARY v. WINEHOUSE and Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc.

Date: Dec 20, 2000
Enhancing Rule 11 Enforcement: Insights from GURARY v. WINEHOUSE and Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc. Introduction The case of Mordechai GURARY v. Isaac WINEHOUSE and Isaac Winehouse, doing business as Wall...
Non-Retroactive Application of Regulatory Obligations: Sheahan v. Sweet

Non-Retroactive Application of Regulatory Obligations: Sheahan v. Sweet

Date: Dec 14, 2000
Non-Retroactive Application of Regulatory Obligations: Sheahan v. Sweet Introduction In Sheahan v. Sweet, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed a pivotal issue...
Armienti v. United States: Establishing the Necessity of Evidentiary Hearings in Conflict of Interest Claims

Armienti v. United States: Establishing the Necessity of Evidentiary Hearings in Conflict of Interest Claims

Date: Dec 13, 2000
Armienti v. United States: Establishing the Necessity of Evidentiary Hearings in Conflict of Interest Claims Introduction Armienti v. United States, 234 F.3d 820 (2d Cir. 2000), is a seminal case...
Application of the Chapadeau Standard in Corporate Defamation: Konikoff v. Prudential Insurance Co.

Application of the Chapadeau Standard in Corporate Defamation: Konikoff v. Prudential Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 8, 2000
Application of the Chapadeau Standard in Corporate Defamation: Konikoff v. Prudential Insurance Co. 1. Introduction The legal landscape of defamation law was further clarified in the case of Paula A....
Waiver of Administrative Exhaustion in Title VII Claims: Insights from Francis v. City of New York

Waiver of Administrative Exhaustion in Title VII Claims: Insights from Francis v. City of New York

Date: Dec 7, 2000
Waiver of Administrative Exhaustion in Title VII Claims: Insights from Francis v. City of New York Introduction The case of H. George Francis v. City of New York and Human Resources Administration,...
Due Process and the Use of Restraints in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from DeLeon v. Strack

Due Process and the Use of Restraints in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from DeLeon v. Strack

Date: Dec 7, 2000
Due Process and the Use of Restraints in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from DeLeon v. Strack Introduction Willie DeLEON, Petitioner-Appellant, appealed against the decision of Wayne L. Strack,...
Affirmation of State Action and Due Process in Child Custody: Kia P. v. McIntyre

Affirmation of State Action and Due Process in Child Custody: Kia P. v. McIntyre

Date: Dec 6, 2000
Affirmation of State Action and Due Process in Child Custody: Kia P. v. McIntyre Introduction Kia P. v. Dually et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Fisher and Reeves Standards Affirmed: Denial of Age Discrimination Claim in Dennis James v. NY Racing Association

Fisher and Reeves Standards Affirmed: Denial of Age Discrimination Claim in Dennis James v. NY Racing Association

Date: Nov 30, 2000
Fisher and Reeves Standards Affirmed: Denial of Age Discrimination Claim in Dennis James v. NY Racing Association Introduction The case of Dennis James v. New York Racing Association (NYRA) examines...
Ambiguity in Termination Provisions: Analysis of Compagnie Financiere de CIC et de l'Union Européenne v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith Inc.

Ambiguity in Termination Provisions: Analysis of Compagnie Financiere de CIC et de l'Union Européenne v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith Inc.

Date: Nov 18, 2000
Ambiguity in Termination Provisions: Analysis of Compagnie Financiere de CIC et de l'Union Européenne v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith Inc. Introduction The case of Compagnie Financiere de CIC...
Mask v. McGinnis: Affirming 'Reasonable Probability' in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Mask v. McGinnis: Affirming 'Reasonable Probability' in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Nov 16, 2000
Mask v. McGinnis: Affirming 'Reasonable Probability' in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction Mask v. McGinnis, 233 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal...
Enhanced Corroboration Standards in Asylum and Withholding of Deportation: Diallo v. INS

Enhanced Corroboration Standards in Asylum and Withholding of Deportation: Diallo v. INS

Date: Nov 14, 2000
Enhanced Corroboration Standards in Asylum and Withholding of Deportation: Diallo v. INS Introduction Moussa Diallo v. Immigration Naturalization Service (INS), 232 F.3d 279 (2d Cir. 2000), is a...
Selective Enforcement and Retaliation in Law Enforcement: Insights from Diesel v. Town of Lewisboro

Selective Enforcement and Retaliation in Law Enforcement: Insights from Diesel v. Town of Lewisboro

Date: Nov 10, 2000
Selective Enforcement and Retaliation in Law Enforcement: Insights from Diesel v. Town of Lewisboro Introduction The case of Lynne Diesel v. Town of Lewisboro (232 F.3d 92, Second Circuit, 2000)...
Fiduciary Duty in Contingent Fee Distribution Upon Law Firm Dissolution: Insights from Santalucia v. Sebright Transportation

Fiduciary Duty in Contingent Fee Distribution Upon Law Firm Dissolution: Insights from Santalucia v. Sebright Transportation

Date: Nov 10, 2000
Fiduciary Duty in Contingent Fee Distribution Upon Law Firm Dissolution: Insights from Santalucia v. Sebright Transportation, Inc. Introduction The case of Frank G. Santalucia, as Parent and Legal...
Unconstitutional Residency Requirement for Petition Witnesses under First Amendment: Lerman v. Board of Elections

Unconstitutional Residency Requirement for Petition Witnesses under First Amendment: Lerman v. Board of Elections

Date: Nov 10, 2000
Unconstitutional Residency Requirement for Petition Witnesses under First Amendment: Lerman v. Board of Elections Introduction The case of Anita Lerman and Angelo D'Angelo v. Board of Elections in...
Schnabel v. Abramson: Second Circuit Reaffirms Non-State-Actor Status of Legal Aid Society and Upholds Summary Judgment on ADEA Claims Post-Reeves

Schnabel v. Abramson: Second Circuit Reaffirms Non-State-Actor Status of Legal Aid Society and Upholds Summary Judgment on ADEA Claims Post-Reeves

Date: Nov 9, 2000
Schnabel v. Abramson: Second Circuit Reaffirms Non-State-Actor Status of Legal Aid Society and Upholds Summary Judgment on ADEA Claims Post-Reeves Introduction The case of Philip H. Schnabel v. Gary...
Equitable Tolling in Immigration Proceedings: Stanisla v. Iavorski Analysis

Equitable Tolling in Immigration Proceedings: Stanisla v. Iavorski Analysis

Date: Nov 8, 2000
Equitable Tolling in Immigration Proceedings: Stanisla v. Iavorski Analysis Introduction Stanisla v. Iavorski, 232 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case addressing the application of equitable...
Establishing Correct Jury Instruction Standards in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Gordon v. NYC Board of Education

Establishing Correct Jury Instruction Standards in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Gordon v. NYC Board of Education

Date: Nov 7, 2000
Establishing Correct Jury Instruction Standards in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Gordon v. NYC Board of Education Introduction Gordon v. New York City Board of Education is a pivotal case decided by...
Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International: Affirmation of State Procedural Bar on Cross-Complaint Claims in Federal Court

Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International: Affirmation of State Procedural Bar on Cross-Complaint Claims in Federal Court

Date: Nov 4, 2000
Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International: Affirmation of State Procedural Bar on Cross-Complaint Claims in Federal Court Introduction The case of Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International (231 F.3d 82, 2000) is...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert