Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancing Procedural Due Process in Prison Administrative Segregation: Insights from Taylor v. Rodriguez

Enhancing Procedural Due Process in Prison Administrative Segregation: Insights from Taylor v. Rodriguez

Date: Jan 19, 2001
Enhancing Procedural Due Process in Prison Administrative Segregation: Insights from Taylor v. Rodriguez Introduction The landmark case of Derrick Taylor v. A. Rodriguez et al. (238 F.3d 188)...
Clarifying Abuse of Trust in Fiduciary Fraud: United States v. Gerald Hirsch

Clarifying Abuse of Trust in Fiduciary Fraud: United States v. Gerald Hirsch

Date: Jan 18, 2001
Clarifying Abuse of Trust in Fiduciary Fraud: United States v. Gerald Hirsch Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Gerald Hirsch, 239 F.3d 221 (2d Cir. 2001), the United...
Affirmation of §202(a) Discrimination Claim and Burden-Shifting in NCA v. AT&T

Affirmation of §202(a) Discrimination Claim and Burden-Shifting in NCA v. AT&T

Date: Jan 13, 2001
Affirmation of §202(a) Discrimination Claim and Burden-Shifting in NCA v. AT&T Introduction The case of National Communications Association, Inc. (NCA) v. AT&T Corp. centers on allegations of...
Clarifying Libel Standards for Public Figures: Analysis of Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner

Clarifying Libel Standards for Public Figures: Analysis of Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner

Date: Jan 13, 2001
Clarifying Libel Standards for Public Figures: Analysis of Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner Introduction The case of Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc.,...
Second Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof for Hybrid §301/Duty of Fair Representation Claims in Labor Agreements

Second Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof for Hybrid §301/Duty of Fair Representation Claims in Labor Agreements

Date: Jan 11, 2001
Second Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof for Hybrid §301/Duty of Fair Representation Claims in Labor Agreements Introduction In the landmark case of Stanley WHITE, Ulysses Brown, and Donald W....
Deference to Foreign Hague Judgments Established: Diorinou v. Mezitis

Deference to Foreign Hague Judgments Established: Diorinou v. Mezitis

Date: Jan 10, 2001
Deference to Foreign Hague Judgments Established: Diorinou v. Mezitis Introduction Diorinou v. Mezitis, 237 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2001), addresses a pivotal issue in international family law: the extent...
Qualified Immunity for Supervisory Police Officers: Analysis of Ford v. Moore & Mitchell

Qualified Immunity for Supervisory Police Officers: Analysis of Ford v. Moore & Mitchell

Date: Jan 9, 2001
Qualified Immunity for Supervisory Police Officers: Analysis of Ford v. Moore & Mitchell Introduction Ford v. Moore & Mitchell is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Preemption of State Law Claims in Bankruptcy: Analysis of Huminski v. Factory Point National Bank

Preemption of State Law Claims in Bankruptcy: Analysis of Huminski v. Factory Point National Bank

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Preemption of State Law Claims in Bankruptcy: Analysis of Huminski v. Factory Point National Bank Introduction The case of Eastern Equipment and Services Corporation, Scott Huminski, as owner of the...
Lindstadt v. Keane: Reinforcing the Strickland Standard through Cumulative Defense Counsel Errors

Lindstadt v. Keane: Reinforcing the Strickland Standard through Cumulative Defense Counsel Errors

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Lindstadt v. Keane: Reinforcing the Strickland Standard through Cumulative Defense Counsel Errors Introduction George Lindstadt, the petitioner-appellant, faced a conviction in the New York Supreme...
Second Circuit Affirms Standards for Class Action Settlement Approval and Denial of Timely Intervention

Second Circuit Affirms Standards for Class Action Settlement Approval and Denial of Timely Intervention

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Second Circuit Affirms Standards for Class Action Settlement Approval and Denial of Timely Intervention Introduction In the landmark case of Alfonse M. D'AMATO et al. v. Deutsche Bank et al., the...
Extending Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity to Appellate Advocacy: Analysis of Parkinson v. Cozzolino

Extending Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity to Appellate Advocacy: Analysis of Parkinson v. Cozzolino

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Extending Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity to Appellate Advocacy: Analysis of Parkinson v. Cozzolino Introduction Donald Parkinson v. Beth Cozzolino, Columbia County District Attorney and Catherine...
Protecting Pro Se Litigants: Enhanced Standards for Rule 41(b) Dismissals in Federal Courts

Protecting Pro Se Litigants: Enhanced Standards for Rule 41(b) Dismissals in Federal Courts

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Protecting Pro Se Litigants: Enhanced Standards for Rule 41(b) Dismissals in Federal Courts Introduction The case of Barry LeSANE v. Hall's Security Analyst, Inc. stands as a pivotal decision in...
BLONDIN v. DUBOIS: Second Circuit Affirms 'Grave Risk' Exception in Hague Convention Child Abduction Case

BLONDIN v. DUBOIS: Second Circuit Affirms 'Grave Risk' Exception in Hague Convention Child Abduction Case

Date: Jan 5, 2001
BLONDIN v. DUBOIS: Second Circuit Affirms 'Grave Risk' Exception in Hague Convention Child Abduction Case Introduction The case of Felix Blondin v. Marthe Dubois (238 F.3d 153), adjudicated by the...
Defining AEDPA Timing and Upholding Limited Courtroom Closures under Waller Standards in Williams v. Artuz

Defining AEDPA Timing and Upholding Limited Courtroom Closures under Waller Standards in Williams v. Artuz

Date: Jan 4, 2001
Defining AEDPA Timing and Upholding Limited Courtroom Closures under Waller Standards in Williams v. Artuz Introduction James Williams, the petitioner-appellant, appealed his conviction in the case...
Muniz v. United States: Defining First vs. Second § 2255 Petitions under AEDPA

Muniz v. United States: Defining First vs. Second § 2255 Petitions under AEDPA

Date: Jan 3, 2001
Muniz v. United States: Defining First vs. Second § 2255 Petitions under AEDPA Introduction In Muniz v. United States, 236 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2001), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Fee-Shifting Provisions and the Impact of Broad Releases: Insights from Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens

Fee-Shifting Provisions and the Impact of Broad Releases: Insights from Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens

Date: Dec 29, 2000
Fee-Shifting Provisions and the Impact of Broad Releases: Insights from Krumme v. WestPoint Stevens Introduction KRUMME v. WESTPOINT STEVENS INC. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Imperfect Entrapment as a Basis for Downward Sentencing Departures: United States v. Kantilal Patel

Imperfect Entrapment as a Basis for Downward Sentencing Departures: United States v. Kantilal Patel

Date: Dec 29, 2000
Imperfect Entrapment as a Basis for Downward Sentencing Departures: United States v. Kantilal Patel Introduction United States of America v. Kantilal Patel, 236 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2000), is a...
Yale's Mandatory Housing Policy and Religious Accommodation: Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Claims

Yale's Mandatory Housing Policy and Religious Accommodation: Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Claims

Date: Dec 29, 2000
Yale's Mandatory Housing Policy and Religious Accommodation: Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Claims Introduction In Elisha D. Hack, Jeremy A. Hershman, Batsheva Greer, and Lisa B. Friedman v....
Res Judicata and Ancillary Jurisdiction: Insights from Bank of India v. Trendi Sportswear, Inc.

Res Judicata and Ancillary Jurisdiction: Insights from Bank of India v. Trendi Sportswear, Inc.

Date: Dec 28, 2000
Res Judicata and Ancillary Jurisdiction: Insights from Bank of India v. Trendi Sportswear, Inc. Introduction The case of Bank of India v. Trendi Sportswear, Inc. presents a complex interplay of...
Enhanced Control Over Employment Classification Under Title VII and NYHRL

Enhanced Control Over Employment Classification Under Title VII and NYHRL

Date: Dec 27, 2000
Enhanced Control Over Employment Classification Under Title VII and NYHRL Introduction In the landmark case of Julianne Eisenberg v. Advance Relocation Storage, Inc., the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert