Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Rule 804(b)(6) and Predicate Act Sufficiency in RICO Cases: A Comprehensive Review of United States v. Dhinsa

Rule 804(b)(6) and Predicate Act Sufficiency in RICO Cases: A Comprehensive Review of United States v. Dhinsa

Date: Mar 22, 2001
Rule 804(b)(6) and Predicate Act Sufficiency in RICO Cases: A Comprehensive Review of United States v. Dhinsa Introduction United States v. Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa is a landmark case decided by the...
Second Circuit Upholds Exhaustion and 'Cause and Prejudice' Standards for §2241 Habeas Corpus Petitions by Federal Prisoners

Second Circuit Upholds Exhaustion and 'Cause and Prejudice' Standards for §2241 Habeas Corpus Petitions by Federal Prisoners

Date: Mar 21, 2001
Second Circuit Upholds Exhaustion and 'Cause and Prejudice' Standards for §2241 Habeas Corpus Petitions by Federal Prisoners Introduction In the case of Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States...
Application of Forum State Choice of Law in Bankruptcy Court: In re Gaston Snow

Application of Forum State Choice of Law in Bankruptcy Court: In re Gaston Snow

Date: Mar 20, 2001
Application of Forum State Choice of Law in Bankruptcy Court: In re Gaston Snow Introduction The case In re Gaston Snow, Debtor, Alfred J. Bianco, As Plan Administrator to the Estate of Gaston Snow,...
Employment Discrimination in Law Enforcement: Raniola v. NYPD Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Hostile Work Environments and Retaliation

Employment Discrimination in Law Enforcement: Raniola v. NYPD Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Hostile Work Environments and Retaliation

Date: Mar 20, 2001
Employment Discrimination in Law Enforcement: Raniola v. NYPD Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Hostile Work Environments and Retaliation Introduction The case of Patricia A. Raniola v. NYPD...
Duplicitous Indictments and Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Sturdivant

Duplicitous Indictments and Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Sturdivant

Date: Mar 20, 2001
Duplicitous Indictments and Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Sturdivant Introduction United States of America v. Elbert L. Sturdivant is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of...
Application of RICO to Municipal Enterprises and Extortion: Comprehensive Commentary on DeFalco v. Defendants

Application of RICO to Municipal Enterprises and Extortion: Comprehensive Commentary on DeFalco v. Defendants

Date: Mar 17, 2001
Application of RICO to Municipal Enterprises and Extortion: Comprehensive Commentary on DeFalco v. Defendants Introduction The case of Joseph De FALCO et al. v. John BERNAS et al. (244 F.3d 286)...
Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell: Spoliation Bolsters Disparate Treatment Claims under ADEA and Title VII

Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell: Spoliation Bolsters Disparate Treatment Claims under ADEA and Title VII

Date: Mar 16, 2001
Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell: Spoliation Bolsters Disparate Treatment Claims under ADEA and Title VII Introduction In Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell Public Schools, 243 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2001), the United...
VKK Corp. v. National Football League: Establishing Boundaries on Antitrust Releases and Party Amendments

VKK Corp. v. National Football League: Establishing Boundaries on Antitrust Releases and Party Amendments

Date: Mar 15, 2001
VKK Corp. v. National Football League: Establishing Boundaries on Antitrust Releases and Party Amendments Introduction Case: VKK Corporation, VKK Patriots, Inc. and Victor K. Kiam, II v. National...
Second Circuit Reinforces Strict Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Amid Claims of Ineffective Counsel

Second Circuit Reinforces Strict Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Amid Claims of Ineffective Counsel

Date: Mar 9, 2001
Second Circuit Reinforces Strict Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Amid Claims of Ineffective Counsel Introduction The case of United States of America v. Danilo Hernandez (242 F.3d 110)...
Affirmation of Ancillary Enforcement Jurisdiction over Fraudulent Conveyance Claims Post-PEACOCK v. THOMAS

Affirmation of Ancillary Enforcement Jurisdiction over Fraudulent Conveyance Claims Post-PEACOCK v. THOMAS

Date: Mar 8, 2001
Affirmation of Ancillary Enforcement Jurisdiction over Fraudulent Conveyance Claims Post-PEACOCK v. THOMAS Introduction The appellate case of Dirk EPPERSON and Betty Schneider v. ENTERTAINMENT...
Legal Commentary on United States v. Luiz Ben Zvi: Establishing Precedents in Conspiracy and Statute of Limitations

Legal Commentary on United States v. Luiz Ben Zvi: Establishing Precedents in Conspiracy and Statute of Limitations

Date: Mar 7, 2001
United States v. Luiz Ben Zvi: Establishing Precedents in Conspiracy and Statute of Limitations Introduction The case of United States of America v. Luiz Ben Zvi, adjudicated by the United States...
Expanding Retaliation Protections under Title VII and New York Human Rights Law: McMenemy v. City of Rochester

Expanding Retaliation Protections under Title VII and New York Human Rights Law: McMenemy v. City of Rochester

Date: Mar 3, 2001
Expanding Retaliation Protections under Title VII and New York Human Rights Law: McMenemy v. City of Rochester Introduction McMenemy v. City of Rochester is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Pension Transfers: Insights from Flanigan v. General Electric Co.

Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Pension Transfers: Insights from Flanigan v. General Electric Co.

Date: Mar 3, 2001
Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Pension Transfers: Insights from Flanigan v. General Electric Co. Introduction The case of Flanigan et al. v. General Electric Co. et al. (242 F.3d 78) addresses critical...
Understanding FHSA Preemption in Product Labeling: The Milanese v. Rust-Oleum Decision

Understanding FHSA Preemption in Product Labeling: The Milanese v. Rust-Oleum Decision

Date: Mar 2, 2001
Understanding FHSA Preemption in Product Labeling: The Milanese v. Rust-Oleum Decision Introduction The case of Milanese v. Rust-Oleum Corporation, reported at 244 F.3d 104, is a pivotal judicial...
Limits of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act for Descriptive Marks: Insights from TCPIP Holding Co. v. Haar Communications Inc.

Limits of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act for Descriptive Marks: Insights from TCPIP Holding Co. v. Haar Communications Inc.

Date: Mar 1, 2001
Limits of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act for Descriptive Marks: Insights from TCPIP Holding Co. v. Haar Communications Inc. Introduction The case of TCPIP Holding Company, Inc. v. Haar...
Whitfield v. Scully: Upholding 40% Cost Recoupment Cap for Prisoners under In Forma Pauperis Statute

Whitfield v. Scully: Upholding 40% Cost Recoupment Cap for Prisoners under In Forma Pauperis Statute

Date: Feb 28, 2001
Whitfield v. Scully: Upholding 40% Cost Recoupment Cap for Prisoners under In Forma Pauperis Statute Introduction Whitfield v. Scully is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Conboy v. AT&T Corp.: Affirming Restrictions on Private Remedies under the Telecommunications Act

Conboy v. AT&T Corp.: Affirming Restrictions on Private Remedies under the Telecommunications Act

Date: Feb 27, 2001
Conboy v. AT&T Corp.: Affirming Restrictions on Private Remedies under the Telecommunications Act Introduction Conboy v. AT&T Corp., 241 F.3d 242, is a pivotal case heard by the United States Court...
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Soft Drink Workers Union: Arbitration Under Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act Affirmed

Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Soft Drink Workers Union: Arbitration Under Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act Affirmed

Date: Feb 27, 2001
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Soft Drink Workers Union: Arbitration Under Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act Affirmed Introduction The case of The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.,...
Lanham Act Enforcement: Second Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Clorox's Misleading Advertisements in S.C. Johnson v. Clorox

Lanham Act Enforcement: Second Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Clorox's Misleading Advertisements in S.C. Johnson v. Clorox

Date: Feb 24, 2001
Lanham Act Enforcement: Second Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Clorox's Misleading Advertisements in S.C. Johnson v. Clorox Introduction The case of S.C. Johnson Son, Inc. v. The Clorox Company,...
Inherent Judicial Authority to Grant Bail in Immigration Habeas Proceedings: Colin Mapp Decision

Inherent Judicial Authority to Grant Bail in Immigration Habeas Proceedings: Colin Mapp Decision

Date: Feb 24, 2001
Inherent Judicial Authority to Grant Bail in Immigration Habeas Proceedings: Colin Mapp Decision Introduction The case of Colin Mapp v. Janet Reno addressed a pivotal issue in U.S. immigration law:...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert