Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Strict Compliance with Warsaw Convention: FedEx's Limitation of Liability Affirmed in Fujitsu v. Federal Express

Strict Compliance with Warsaw Convention: FedEx's Limitation of Liability Affirmed in Fujitsu v. Federal Express

Date: Apr 21, 2001
Strict Compliance with Warsaw Convention: FedEx's Limitation of Liability Affirmed in Fujitsu v. Federal Express Introduction In the appellate case Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express Corporation, the...
Strict Adherence to Appellate Deadlines Affirmed in McAllan v. City of New York

Strict Adherence to Appellate Deadlines Affirmed in McAllan v. City of New York

Date: Apr 20, 2001
Strict Adherence to Appellate Deadlines Affirmed in McAllan v. City of New York Introduction McAllan v. City of New York, 248 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2001), addresses the critical issue of appellate...
Second Circuit Upholds Lifetime Union Bans for Fiduciary Breach and Embezzlement in IBT Case

Second Circuit Upholds Lifetime Union Bans for Fiduciary Breach and Embezzlement in IBT Case

Date: Apr 19, 2001
Second Circuit Upholds Lifetime Union Bans for Fiduciary Breach and Embezzlement in IBT Case Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et...
Broadening the Scope of Arbitration: Insights from Hartford Accident Indem. Co. v. Swiss Reinsurance Am. Corp.

Broadening the Scope of Arbitration: Insights from Hartford Accident Indem. Co. v. Swiss Reinsurance Am. Corp.

Date: Apr 17, 2001
Broadening the Scope of Arbitration: Insights from Hartford Accident Indem. Co. v. Swiss Reinsurance Am. Corp. Introduction The case of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al. v. Swiss...
Involuntary Pleas and Effective Counsel: Analysis of Urena v. People of New York

Involuntary Pleas and Effective Counsel: Analysis of Urena v. People of New York

Date: Apr 11, 2001
Involuntary Pleas and Effective Counsel: Analysis of Urena v. People of New York Introduction Felipe Urena v. The People of the State of New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606 (S.D.N.Y. 2001), presents a...
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Seizing Police Officers: Comprehensive Analysis of Cerrone v. Brown

Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Seizing Police Officers: Comprehensive Analysis of Cerrone v. Brown

Date: Apr 11, 2001
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Seizing Police Officers: Comprehensive Analysis of Cerrone v. Brown Introduction Cerrone v. Brown, 246 F.3d 194 (2d Cir. 2001), is a pivotal appellate court...
Affirmation of Compulsory Process Rights: NOBLE v. KELLY Establishes Willfulness Requirement for Exclusion of Alibi Testimony

Affirmation of Compulsory Process Rights: NOBLE v. KELLY Establishes Willfulness Requirement for Exclusion of Alibi Testimony

Date: Apr 6, 2001
Affirmation of Compulsory Process Rights: NOBLE v. KELLY Establishes Willfulness Requirement for Exclusion of Alibi Testimony Introduction Casim Noble v. Walter R. Kelly is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Finley Decision: Second Circuit Restricts Multiple §924(c)(1) Firearm Convictions in Single Transaction

Finley Decision: Second Circuit Restricts Multiple §924(c)(1) Firearm Convictions in Single Transaction

Date: Apr 6, 2001
Finley Decision: Second Circuit Restricts Multiple §924(c)(1) Firearm Convictions in Single Transaction Introduction The case of United States of America v. Terry Finley, adjudicated by the United...
On Davis v. The Gap, Inc.: Establishing Actual Damages Through Reasonable License Fees

On Davis v. The Gap, Inc.: Establishing Actual Damages Through Reasonable License Fees

Date: Apr 4, 2001
On Davis v. The Gap, Inc.: Establishing Actual Damages Through Reasonable License Fees Introduction In the case of On Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Gap, Inc., Defendant-Appellee (246 F.3d 152),...
MERRITT v. SHUTTLE, INC.: Expanding Federal Tort Claims Act Jurisdiction Beyond Exclusive Appellate Review

MERRITT v. SHUTTLE, INC.: Expanding Federal Tort Claims Act Jurisdiction Beyond Exclusive Appellate Review

Date: Apr 4, 2001
MERRITT v. SHUTTLE, INC.: Expanding Federal Tort Claims Act Jurisdiction Beyond Exclusive Appellate Review Introduction Richard Merritt and Mary Jo Merritt ("plaintiffs") initiated legal action...
Second Circuit Reinforces Brady Material Significance Under AEDPA in Boyette Case

Second Circuit Reinforces Brady Material Significance Under AEDPA in Boyette Case

Date: Apr 4, 2001
Second Circuit Reinforces Brady Material Significance Under AEDPA in Boyette Case Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in the landmark case of Robert Cal v. n...
Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas and Perjury in Affidavits: Analysis of United States v. Lancaster

Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas and Perjury in Affidavits: Analysis of United States v. Lancaster

Date: Apr 3, 2001
Voluntariness of Guilty Pleas and Perjury in Affidavits: Analysis of United States v. Lancaster Introduction United States v. Raymond H. Lancaster, 245 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case...
Second or Successive §2255 Motions: Limitations Under AEDPA - Analysis of Jiminian v. Nash

Second or Successive §2255 Motions: Limitations Under AEDPA - Analysis of Jiminian v. Nash

Date: Apr 3, 2001
Second or Successive §2255 Motions: Limitations Under AEDPA - Analysis of Jiminian v. Nash Introduction The case of Benito Jiminian v. John Nash, Warden FCI Ray Brook, decided by the United States...
Scope of Conspiracy Agreement in Insider Trading: McDermott v. United States

Scope of Conspiracy Agreement in Insider Trading: McDermott v. United States

Date: Mar 30, 2001
Scope of Conspiracy Agreement in Insider Trading: McDermott v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. James J. McDermott, Jr. (245 F.3d 133) serves as a pivotal judgment...
Crescent Publishing Group v. Playboy Enterprises: Guidelines for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under 17 U.S.C. §505

Crescent Publishing Group v. Playboy Enterprises: Guidelines for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under 17 U.S.C. §505

Date: Mar 28, 2001
Crescent Publishing Group v. Playboy Enterprises: Guidelines for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under 17 U.S.C. §505 Introduction In the case of Crescent Publishing Group, Inc. v. Playboy Enterprises,...
Defining Taxpayer Standing and First Amendment Compliance in Educational Settings: Altman v. Bedford Central School District

Defining Taxpayer Standing and First Amendment Compliance in Educational Settings: Altman v. Bedford Central School District

Date: Mar 28, 2001
Defining Taxpayer Standing and First Amendment Compliance in Educational Settings: Altman v. Bedford Central School District Introduction The case of Robert M. Altman and Victoria L. Altman, his...
Broadening the Scope of Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: Insights from Gregory v. Daly

Broadening the Scope of Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: Insights from Gregory v. Daly

Date: Mar 28, 2001
Broadening the Scope of Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: Insights from Gregory v. Daly Introduction The case of Theresa Gregory v. Edward J. Daly addressed significant issues related to...
AEDPA §440(d) Upheld: Retroactive Denial of Section 212(c) Relief in Gyno Domond v. INS

AEDPA §440(d) Upheld: Retroactive Denial of Section 212(c) Relief in Gyno Domond v. INS

Date: Mar 24, 2001
AEDPA §440(d) Upheld: Retroactive Denial of Section 212(c) Relief in Gyno Domond v. INS Introduction The case of Gyno Domond v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), decided by...
Affirmation of Rule 33 New Trial in Racketeering Conspiracy: United States v. Ferguson

Affirmation of Rule 33 New Trial in Racketeering Conspiracy: United States v. Ferguson

Date: Mar 24, 2001
Affirmation of Rule 33 New Trial in Racketeering Conspiracy: United States v. Gregory Ferguson Introduction The case of United States of America v. Gregory Ferguson (246 F.3d 129) serves as a pivotal...
Affidavit Admissibility in Summary Judgment Motions: Santos v. Murdock Establishes Stricter Standards

Affidavit Admissibility in Summary Judgment Motions: Santos v. Murdock Establishes Stricter Standards

Date: Mar 24, 2001
Affidavit Admissibility in Summary Judgment Motions: Santos v. Murdock Establishes Stricter Standards Introduction The case of Angel Santos v. John M. Murdock, decided by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert