Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirming Trade Dress Protection: Insights from Nora Beverages, Inc. v. The Perrier Group of America, Inc.

Affirming Trade Dress Protection: Insights from Nora Beverages, Inc. v. The Perrier Group of America, Inc.

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Affirming Trade Dress Protection: Insights from Nora Beverages, Inc. v. The Perrier Group of America, Inc. Introduction Nora Beverages, Inc. v. The Perrier Group of America, Inc. is a pivotal case in...
Affirmation of Conversion Caps in Determining Beneficial Ownership under Section 16(b): Southbrook v. ImmunoGen

Affirmation of Conversion Caps in Determining Beneficial Ownership under Section 16(b): Southbrook v. ImmunoGen

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Affirmation of Conversion Caps in Determining Beneficial Ownership under Section 16(b): Southbrook v. ImmunoGen Introduction The case of Mark Levy, Derivatively on behalf of ImmunoGen Inc. v....
Liability Standards in Sexual Assault Cases: Girden v. Sandals International Analysis

Liability Standards in Sexual Assault Cases: Girden v. Sandals International Analysis

Date: Aug 22, 2001
Liability Standards in Sexual Assault Cases: Girden v. Sandals International Analysis Introduction Girden v. Sandals International, 262 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2001), is a seminal case that addresses the...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in §1983 Claims: Provost v. Newburgh

Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in §1983 Claims: Provost v. Newburgh

Date: Aug 18, 2001
Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in §1983 Claims: Provost v. The City of Newburgh Introduction In the landmark case of Robert Provost v. The City of Newburgh, the United States...
Establishing the Standard for Interlocutory Appeals under Rule 23(f): In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation

Establishing the Standard for Interlocutory Appeals under Rule 23(f): In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation

Date: Aug 16, 2001
Establishing the Standard for Interlocutory Appeals under Rule 23(f): In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation Introduction The case of In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation represents a pivotal moment in the...
Establishing AEDPA Deference Standards in Effective Assistance of Counsel: Sellan v. Kuhlman

Establishing AEDPA Deference Standards in Effective Assistance of Counsel: Sellan v. Kuhlman

Date: Aug 15, 2001
Establishing AEDPA Deference Standards in Effective Assistance of Counsel: Sellan v. Kuhlman Introduction Sellan v. Kuhlman, 261 F.3d 303 (2d Cir. 2001), presents a pivotal analysis of the...
Turner v. Artuz: Establishing Boundaries for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA

Turner v. Artuz: Establishing Boundaries for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA

Date: Aug 14, 2001
Turner v. Artuz: Establishing Boundaries for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA Introduction Kevin Turner, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted of multiple counts of murder, attempted...
Affirmation of Due Process and Equal Protection in Passport Denial for Child Support Arrears

Affirmation of Due Process and Equal Protection in Passport Denial for Child Support Arrears

Date: Aug 11, 2001
Affirmation of Due Process and Equal Protection in Passport Denial for Child Support Arrears Introduction In the case of Monty Neil Weinstein v. Madeleine K. Albright, decided on August 10, 2001, the...
Yurman Design, Inc. v. PAJ, Inc.: Establishing Clear Standards for Trade Dress Protection in Jewelry Design

Yurman Design, Inc. v. PAJ, Inc.: Establishing Clear Standards for Trade Dress Protection in Jewelry Design

Date: Aug 11, 2001
Yurman Design, Inc. v. PAJ, Inc.: Establishing Clear Standards for Trade Dress Protection in Jewelry Design Introduction The case of Yurman Design, Inc. v. PAJ, Inc. (262 F.3d 101) adjudicated by the...
Empowering Creditors' Committees: Legal Precedent in In re Commodore International Limited

Empowering Creditors' Committees: Legal Precedent in In re Commodore International Limited

Date: Aug 10, 2001
Empowering Creditors' Committees: Legal Precedent in In re Commodore International Limited Introduction The case of In re Commodore International Limited and Commodore Electronics Limited, Debtors...
Second Circuit Expands Standards for Intervention in Employment Discrimination Settlements Affecting Seniority Rights

Second Circuit Expands Standards for Intervention in Employment Discrimination Settlements Affecting Seniority Rights

Date: Aug 4, 2001
Second Circuit Expands Standards for Intervention in Employment Discrimination Settlements Affecting Seniority Rights Introduction The case of Intervenors-Appellants v. New York City Board of...
Mootness and Vacatur in Special Education Funding: Russman v. Board of Education

Mootness and Vacatur in Special Education Funding: Russman v. Board of Education

Date: Aug 4, 2001
Mootness and Vacatur in Special Education Funding: Russman v. Board of Education Introduction Russman v. Board of Education of the Enlarged City School District of the City of Watervliet is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Defendants on ADA Claims and Reversal of Attorney's Fees in Parker v. Sony Pictures Entertainment

Affirmation of Defendants on ADA Claims and Reversal of Attorney's Fees in Parker v. Sony Pictures Entertainment

Date: Aug 4, 2001
Affirmation of Defendants on ADA Claims and Reversal of Attorney's Fees in Parker v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Introduction In the case of Douglas Parker v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., the...
Timeliness and Classification of Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Insights from Patel v. Contemporary Classics

Timeliness and Classification of Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Insights from Patel v. Contemporary Classics

Date: Aug 4, 2001
Timeliness and Classification of Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Insights from Patel v. Contemporary Classics Introduction In the appellate case of Kanti A. Patel v. Contemporary Classics of Beverly Hills and...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and Requiring Evidentiary Hearings: Insights from the Second Circuit's Decision in Rationis Enterprises, Inc. v. Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co.

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and Requiring Evidentiary Hearings: Insights from the Second Circuit's Decision in Rationis Enterprises, Inc. v. Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co.

Date: Aug 4, 2001
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and Requiring Evidentiary Hearings: Insights from the Second Circuit's Decision in Rationis Enterprises, Inc. v. Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co. Introduction The case of...
Affirmation of Forfeiture of Right to Counsel Due to Defendant's Misconduct in Gilchrist v. O'Keefe

Affirmation of Forfeiture of Right to Counsel Due to Defendant's Misconduct in Gilchrist v. O'Keefe

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Affirmation of Forfeiture of Right to Counsel Due to Defendant's Misconduct in Gilchrist v. O'Keefe Introduction In the landmark case Gilchrist v. O'Keefe, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Kolstad Standard Applied to Local Administrative Code for Punitive Damages in Retaliation Claims

Kolstad Standard Applied to Local Administrative Code for Punitive Damages in Retaliation Claims

Date: Aug 2, 2001
Kolstad Standard Applied to Local Administrative Code for Punitive Damages in Retaliation Claims Introduction Farias and Robinson v. Instructional Systems, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Equitable Tolling in §2255 Motions: Donald Green v. United States

Equitable Tolling in §2255 Motions: Donald Green v. United States

Date: Jul 28, 2001
Equitable Tolling in §2255 Motions: Donald Green v. United States Introduction The case of Donald Green v. United States, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on July...
Kerman v. City of New York: Establishing Limits on Warrantless Police Entry

Kerman v. City of New York: Establishing Limits on Warrantless Police Entry

Date: Jul 27, 2001
Kerman v. City of New York: Establishing Limits on Warrantless Police Entry Introduction Kerman v. City of New York, 261 F.3d 229 (2d Cir. 2001), is a seminal case that delineates the constitutional...
Ambiguity in Joint Venture Agreements Requires Jury Determination: Scholastic v. Harris

Ambiguity in Joint Venture Agreements Requires Jury Determination: Scholastic v. Harris

Date: Jul 27, 2001
Ambiguity in Joint Venture Agreements Requires Jury Determination: Scholastic v. Harris Introduction The case of Scholastic, Inc. and Scholastic Productions, Inc. v. Robert Harris and Harris...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert