Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Timing and Scope of Brady Obligations: Insights from United States v. Coppa et al.

Timing and Scope of Brady Obligations: Insights from United States v. Coppa et al.

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Timing and Scope of Brady Obligations: Insights from United States v. Coppa et al. Introduction The landmark case In re United States of America, Petitioner. United States of America v. Frank Coppa,...
Procedural Defaults and Effective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: The Aparicio v. Artuz Decision

Procedural Defaults and Effective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: The Aparicio v. Artuz Decision

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Procedural Defaults and Effective Assistance of Counsel under AEDPA: The Aparicio v. Artuz Decision Introduction The case of David Aparicio v. Christopher Artuz presented before the United States...
Denny's Discrimination Case: Affirmation of Summary Judgment under § 1981 and § 2000a

Denny's Discrimination Case: Affirmation of Summary Judgment under § 1981 and § 2000a

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Denny's Discrimination Case: Affirmation of Summary Judgment under § 1981 and § 2000a Introduction In the landmark case of Arnold Roderrick Lizarro et al. v. Denny's, Inc. et al. (270 F.3d 94, 2d...
Second Circuit Affirms Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Prison Conditions Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)

Second Circuit Affirms Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Prison Conditions Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)

Date: Oct 5, 2001
Second Circuit Affirms Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Prison Conditions Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) Introduction In the landmark case of Christopher Neal v. Glenn S. Goord...
VAN WIE v. PATAKI: Clarifying Mootness in Election Law Challenges

VAN WIE v. PATAKI: Clarifying Mootness in Election Law Challenges

Date: Oct 5, 2001
VAN WIE v. PATAKI: Clarifying Mootness in Election Law Challenges Introduction In the landmark case of Wendy Van Wie and Lloyd F. Wright v. George Pataki et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation and Reversal in Marine Insurance Dispute: New Precedents on Agent-Imputed Knowledge and Policy Termination

Affirmation and Reversal in Marine Insurance Dispute: New Precedents on Agent-Imputed Knowledge and Policy Termination

Date: Sep 28, 2001
Affirmation and Reversal in Marine Insurance Dispute: New Precedents on Agent-Imputed Knowledge and Policy Termination Introduction In the appellate case New York Marine General Insurance Company v....
Alawi Kuhali v. Reno: Establishing Precedents in Immigration Law Regarding Firearms Offenses and Aggravated Felonies

Alawi Kuhali v. Reno: Establishing Precedents in Immigration Law Regarding Firearms Offenses and Aggravated Felonies

Date: Sep 28, 2001
Alawi Kuhali v. Reno: Establishing Precedents in Immigration Law Regarding Firearms Offenses and Aggravated Felonies Introduction The case of Alawi Kuhali v. Janet Reno, decided by the United States...
Liability of Limited Partners and Waiver of Indemnification Claims in Arbitration: Pike v. Freeman

Liability of Limited Partners and Waiver of Indemnification Claims in Arbitration: Pike v. Freeman

Date: Sep 27, 2001
Liability of Limited Partners and Waiver of Indemnification Claims in Arbitration: Pike v. Freeman Introduction The case of Joseph D. Pike, Petitioner-Appellee, et al. v. Brian M. Freeman,...
Limiting Private Monetary Claims Against States Under ADA Title II and Rehabilitation Act §504

Limiting Private Monetary Claims Against States Under ADA Title II and Rehabilitation Act §504

Date: Sep 26, 2001
Limiting Private Monetary Claims Against States Under ADA Title II and Rehabilitation Act §504 Introduction Garcia v. State University of New York Health Sciences Center of Brooklyn is a landmark...
Clarifying Municipal Liability Under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Curley v. Village of Suffern

Clarifying Municipal Liability Under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Curley v. Village of Suffern

Date: Sep 11, 2001
Clarifying Municipal Liability Under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Curley v. Village of Suffern Introduction Curley v. Village of Suffern is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Ramirez v. Attorney General: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Exhaustion in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Ramirez v. Attorney General: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Exhaustion in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Sep 8, 2001
Ramirez v. Attorney General: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Exhaustion in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Ramirez v. Attorney General of the State of New York is a pivotal case decided by...
Affirmation of Coverage Under Contaminated Products Insurance Policy

Affirmation of Coverage Under Contaminated Products Insurance Policy

Date: Sep 7, 2001
Affirmation of Coverage Under Contaminated Products Insurance Policy Introduction In the case of National UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE STROH COMPANIES,...
Benjamin v. Fraser: Enhancing Pretrial Detainee Access to Counsel and Procedural Due Process in Restraint Impositions

Benjamin v. Fraser: Enhancing Pretrial Detainee Access to Counsel and Procedural Due Process in Restraint Impositions

Date: Sep 6, 2001
Benjamin v. Fraser: Enhancing Pretrial Detainee Access to Counsel and Procedural Due Process in Restraint Impositions Introduction Benjamin v. Fraser is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Enhanced Standards for Pleading Scienter in Securities Fraud: Analysis of KALNIT v. EICHLER

Enhanced Standards for Pleading Scienter in Securities Fraud: Analysis of KALNIT v. EICHLER

Date: Sep 6, 2001
Enhanced Standards for Pleading Scienter in Securities Fraud: Analysis of KALNIT v. EICHLER Introduction In the landmark case Richard L. Kalnit v. Frank M. Eichler et al., decided by the United...
Reopening Asylum Proceedings Based on New Evidence of Forced Sterilization: Zhao v. U.S. Department of Justice

Reopening Asylum Proceedings Based on New Evidence of Forced Sterilization: Zhao v. U.S. Department of Justice

Date: Sep 6, 2001
Reopening Asylum Proceedings Based on New Evidence of Forced Sterilization: Zhao v. U.S. Department of Justice Introduction Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Department of Justice is a pivotal case that...
Failure to Accommodate and Retaliation Under the ADA: Lovejoy-Wilson v. NOCO Motor Fuel, Inc. Analysis

Failure to Accommodate and Retaliation Under the ADA: Lovejoy-Wilson v. NOCO Motor Fuel, Inc. Analysis

Date: Sep 1, 2001
Failure to Accommodate and Retaliation Under the ADA: Lovejoy-Wilson v. NOCO Motor Fuel, Inc. Analysis Introduction Diane Lovejoy-Wilson v. NOCO Motor Fuel, Inc., 263 F.3d 208 (2d Cir. 2001), is a...
Second Circuit Clarifies 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Race Discrimination Claims: Sheila V. McGuinness v. Lincoln Hall

Second Circuit Clarifies 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Race Discrimination Claims: Sheila V. McGuinness v. Lincoln Hall

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Second Circuit Clarifies 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Race Discrimination Claims: Sheila V. McGuinness v. Lincoln Hall Introduction In the landmark case of Sheila V. McGuinness v. Lincoln Hall,...
Heralding the Significance of Loliscio v. Goord: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Heralding the Significance of Loliscio v. Goord: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Heralding the Significance of Loliscio v. Goord: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary Introduction Christopher Loliscio, the petitioner-appellant, engaged in a legal battle against Glenn Goord, the...
Void vs. Voidable Contracts: Implications for Arbitration Clauses in Sphere Drake v. Clarendon

Void vs. Voidable Contracts: Implications for Arbitration Clauses in Sphere Drake v. Clarendon

Date: Aug 29, 2001
Void vs. Voidable Contracts: Implications for Arbitration Clauses in Sphere Drake Ins. Ltd. v. Clarendon National Ins. Co. Introduction In the realm of contract law, the enforceability of arbitration...
Refining Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation and Due Process Claims: LOCURTO v. GIULIANI

Refining Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation and Due Process Claims: LOCURTO v. GIULIANI

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Refining Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation and Due Process Claims: LOCURTO v. GIULIANI Introduction The case of Joseph Locurto, Jonathan Walters, and Robert Steiner v. Rudolph...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert