Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhanced Disclosure Obligations in Securities Offerings: Insights from Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.

Enhanced Disclosure Obligations in Securities Offerings: Insights from Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.

Date: May 8, 1996
Enhanced Disclosure Obligations in Securities Offerings: Insights from Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp. Introduction The case MERRY LOU SHAW, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, APPELLANTS, v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT...
Affirmation of Default Judgment and Charging Requirements Under Title VII: McKinnon & Poulin v. Kwong Wah Restaurant

Affirmation of Default Judgment and Charging Requirements Under Title VII: McKinnon & Poulin v. Kwong Wah Restaurant

Date: May 2, 1996
Affirmation of Default Judgment and Charging Requirements Under Title VII: McKinnon & Poulin v. Kwong Wah Restaurant Introduction The case of Charissa McKinnon and Beatrice Poulin v. Kwong Wah...
Reinforcing Standards for IIED Claims and Sanctioning Frivolous Litigation with Attorney’s Fees: Andrade v. Jamestown Housing Authority

Reinforcing Standards for IIED Claims and Sanctioning Frivolous Litigation with Attorney’s Fees: Andrade v. Jamestown Housing Authority

Date: May 2, 1996
Reinforcing Standards for IIED Claims and Sanctioning Frivolous Litigation with Attorney’s Fees: Andrade v. Jamestown Housing Authority Introduction The case of Helen Ruth Andrade v. Jamestown...
Trade Dress Infringement Standards Established in TEC Engineering Corp. v. Budget Molders Supply, Inc.

Trade Dress Infringement Standards Established in TEC Engineering Corp. v. Budget Molders Supply, Inc.

Date: May 1, 1996
Trade Dress Infringement Standards Established in TEC Engineering Corp. v. Budget Molders Supply, Inc. Introduction The case of TEC Engineering Corp. v. Budget Molders Supply, Inc., decided by the...
Strict Class Definition Required under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)

Strict Class Definition Required under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)

Date: Apr 26, 1996
Strict Class Definition Required under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) Introduction The case of Alan Aulson et ux. Maureen Aulson v. Charles Blanchard, et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Modification of Secured Claims on Multi-Unit Properties under Section 1322(b)(2)

Modification of Secured Claims on Multi-Unit Properties under Section 1322(b)(2)

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Modification of Secured Claims on Multi-Unit Properties under Section 1322(b)(2) Introduction The case of Lomas Mortgage, Inc. v. Esperandieu Antonine Louis, 82 F.3d 1 (1996), adjudicated by the...
Affirming Private Party Immunity: Hancock v. Roche and the Limits of §1983 Liability

Affirming Private Party Immunity: Hancock v. Roche and the Limits of §1983 Liability

Date: Apr 17, 1996
Affirming Private Party Immunity: Hancock v. Roche and the Limits of §1983 Liability Introduction In the landmark case of Daniel J. Roche et ux. Valerie Roche v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance...
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Bystander Liability: Insights from Blinzler v. Marriott International

Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Bystander Liability: Insights from Blinzler v. Marriott International

Date: Apr 13, 1996
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Bystander Liability: Insights from Blinzler v. Marriott International Introduction The case of Gloria Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc. delves...
Affirmation of Younger Abstention Doctrine in Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court

Affirmation of Younger Abstention Doctrine in Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court

Date: Apr 9, 1996
Affirmation of Younger Abstention Doctrine in Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Introduction The case of Troy E. Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme Court, decided by the United States Court of...
Randazzo v. United States: Clarifying Joinder of Unrelated Offenses and Materiality in Criminal Convictions

Randazzo v. United States: Clarifying Joinder of Unrelated Offenses and Materiality in Criminal Convictions

Date: Apr 9, 1996
Randazzo v. United States: Clarifying Joinder of Unrelated Offenses and Materiality in Criminal Convictions Introduction In United States of America v. G. Robert Randazzo, 80 F.3d 623 (1st Cir....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Perkins v. Brigham Women's Hospital: Upholding Non-Discriminatory Termination

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Perkins v. Brigham Women's Hospital: Upholding Non-Discriminatory Termination

Date: Apr 6, 1996
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Perkins v. Brigham Women's Hospital: Upholding Non-Discriminatory Termination Introduction In the landmark case of Patrick Perkins v. Brigham Women's Hospital and...
First Circuit Clarifies Clean Air Act Conformity Standards in Base Redevelopment

First Circuit Clarifies Clean Air Act Conformity Standards in Base Redevelopment

Date: Apr 3, 1996
First Circuit Clarifies Clean Air Act Conformity Standards in Base Redevelopment Introduction In Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. James Busey, the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Defining 'Hearing' Under the Speedy Trial Act: Insights from United States v. Staula

Defining 'Hearing' Under the Speedy Trial Act: Insights from United States v. Staula

Date: Mar 30, 1996
Defining 'Hearing' Under the Speedy Trial Act: Insights from United States v. Staula Introduction The case of United States of America v. Stephen J. Staula addresses critical aspects of the Speedy...
Enhanced Standards for Jury Instructions and Responses: United States v. Manning

Enhanced Standards for Jury Instructions and Responses: United States v. Manning

Date: Mar 22, 1996
Enhanced Standards for Jury Instructions and Responses: United States v. Manning Introduction United States v. Trent Manning is a significant appellate decision from the United States Court of...
Argencourt v. United States: Reinforcing the Strickland Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Argencourt v. United States: Reinforcing the Strickland Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Date: Mar 19, 1996
Argencourt v. United States: Reinforcing the Strickland Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Introduction In the landmark case of Argencourt v. United States, 78 F.3d...
First Circuit Affirms Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under Puerto Rico Law in COASTAL FUELS v. CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM

First Circuit Affirms Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under Puerto Rico Law in COASTAL FUELS v. CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM

Date: Mar 13, 1996
First Circuit Affirms Secondary-Line Price Discrimination under Puerto Rico Law in COASTAL FUELS v. CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM Introduction The case of Coastal Fuels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Caribbean...
Reasonable Suspicion and Detention Scope: Insights from United States v. McCarthy

Reasonable Suspicion and Detention Scope: Insights from United States v. McCarthy

Date: Feb 27, 1996
Reasonable Suspicion and Detention Scope: Insights from United States v. McCarthy Introduction The case of United States v. Aedan C. McCarthy and Jeffrey Scott Hunter, adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of ERISA's Six-Year Statute of Limitations and Fraudulent Concealment Doctrine in Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson

Affirmation of ERISA's Six-Year Statute of Limitations and Fraudulent Concealment Doctrine in Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson

Date: Feb 21, 1996
Affirmation of ERISA's Six-Year Statute of Limitations and Fraudulent Concealment Doctrine in Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson Introduction In the landmark case of J. Geils...
Kathy Smith v. F.W. Morse Co.: Affirming Position Elimination Under Title VII

Kathy Smith v. F.W. Morse Co.: Affirming Position Elimination Under Title VII

Date: Feb 13, 1996
Kathy Smith v. F.W. Morse Co.: Affirming Position Elimination Under Title VII Introduction Kathy Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Requirement for Expert RFC Assessment in Complex Disability Claims: Manso-Pizarro v. HHS

Requirement for Expert RFC Assessment in Complex Disability Claims: Manso-Pizarro v. HHS

Date: Feb 9, 1996
Requirement for Expert RFC Assessment in Complex Disability Claims: Manso-Pizarro v. HHS Introduction Victoria Manso-Pizarro v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (76 F.3d 15) is a seminal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert