Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Hilti, Inc. v. John Oldach: Affirming the Appealability of Denials to Arbitration Stays

Hilti, Inc. v. John Oldach: Affirming the Appealability of Denials to Arbitration Stays

Date: Mar 29, 1968
Hilti, Inc. v. John Oldach: Affirming the Appealability of Denials to Arbitration Stays Introduction The case of Hilti, Inc. v. John Oldach (392 F.2d 368) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Validating Warrantless Consent Searches Post-Arrest in Gorman v. United States

Validating Warrantless Consent Searches Post-Arrest in Gorman v. United States

Date: Jun 30, 1967
Validating Warrantless Consent Searches Post-Arrest in Gorman v. United States Introduction Robert William Gorman and Edward Terrence Roche, the appellants in Gorman v. United States, were convicted...
Affidavit Time-Specificity Requirement in Search Warrants: Rosencranz & DiPietro v. United States

Affidavit Time-Specificity Requirement in Search Warrants: Rosencranz & DiPietro v. United States

Date: Feb 8, 1966
Affidavit Time-Specificity Requirement in Search Warrants: Rosencranz & DiPietro v. United States Introduction The case of Rosencranz & DiPietro v. United States (356 F.2d 310) was adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Joinder of Defendants under Rule 8(b): King v. United States

Clarifying Joinder of Defendants under Rule 8(b): King v. United States

Date: Jan 19, 1966
Clarifying Joinder of Defendants under Rule 8(b): King v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Donald G. King v. United States of America, decided by the United States Court of Appeals,...
Enhancing Fiduciary Duties under Securities Law: The Janigan v. Taylor Case

Enhancing Fiduciary Duties under Securities Law: The Janigan v. Taylor Case

Date: May 5, 1965
Enhancing Fiduciary Duties under Securities Law: The Janigan v. Taylor Case Introduction The case of John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. Taylor et al. (344 F.2d 781) adjudicated by the United States...
Burden of Proof in Entrapment Defense: Gorin et al. v. United States

Burden of Proof in Entrapment Defense: Gorin et al. v. United States

Date: Feb 21, 1963
Burden of Proof in Entrapment Defense: Gorin et al. v. United States Introduction The case of Gorin, Grillo, and Glassman v. United States (313 F.2d 641, 1963) addresses critical issues surrounding...
Standard for Judicial Disqualification Due to Alleged Bias: Union Leader Corp. v. Haverhill Gazette Co.

Standard for Judicial Disqualification Due to Alleged Bias: Union Leader Corp. v. Haverhill Gazette Co.

Date: Jul 14, 1961
Standard for Judicial Disqualification Due to Alleged Bias: Union Leader Corp. v. Haverhill Gazette Co. Introduction Union Leader Corporation v. Haverhill Gazette Co., 292 F.2d 381 (1st Cir. 1961) is...
Disallowance of Interest Deductions Due to Lack of Substantial Economic Transactions: GOODSTEIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Disallowance of Interest Deductions Due to Lack of Substantial Economic Transactions: GOODSTEIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Date: May 22, 1959
Disallowance of Interest Deductions Due to Lack of Substantial Economic Transactions: GOODSTEIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Introduction GOODSTEIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 267...
Heddendorf v. Goldfine: Clarifying Interlocutory Appeals under 28 U.S.C. §1292(b)

Heddendorf v. Goldfine: Clarifying Interlocutory Appeals under 28 U.S.C. §1292(b)

Date: Feb 27, 1959
Heddendorf v. Goldfine: Clarifying Interlocutory Appeals under 28 U.S.C. §1292(b) Introduction Heddendorf v. Goldfine et al., 263 F.2d 887 (1st Cir. 1959), is a pivotal case in understanding the...
Limitations on Mandamus Review of Venue Transfer Orders Under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): An Analysis of In the Matter of Emanuel Josephson, Petitioner

Limitations on Mandamus Review of Venue Transfer Orders Under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): An Analysis of In the Matter of Emanuel Josephson, Petitioner

Date: Dec 24, 1954
Limitations on Mandamus Review of Venue Transfer Orders Under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): An Analysis of In the Matter of Emanuel Josephson, Petitioner Introduction In the Matter of Emanuel Josephson,...
Good Faith Bargaining Obligations Upheld in NLRB v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co.

Good Faith Bargaining Obligations Upheld in NLRB v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co.

Date: Jun 27, 1953
Good Faith Bargaining Obligations Upheld in NLRB v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co. Introduction In the landmark case National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Manufacturing Co. (205 F.2d 131, 1953), the...
United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.: Establishing Market Control through Strategic Leasing Practices

United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.: Establishing Market Control through Strategic Leasing Practices

Date: Feb 19, 1953
United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.: Establishing Market Control through Strategic Leasing Practices Introduction The case of United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., adjudicated on...
Impact of Legislative Pre-Trial Publicity on Fair Trial Rights: Delaney v. United States

Impact of Legislative Pre-Trial Publicity on Fair Trial Rights: Delaney v. United States

Date: Oct 11, 1952
Impact of Legislative Pre-Trial Publicity on Fair Trial Rights: Delaney v. United States Introduction Case Citation: Delaney v. United States, 199 F.2d 107 (1st Cir. 1952) Court: United States Court...
Admissibility of Superior Equipment Evidence in Maritime Seaworthiness Claims: Doucette v. Vincent et al.

Admissibility of Superior Equipment Evidence in Maritime Seaworthiness Claims: Doucette v. Vincent et al.

Date: Feb 6, 1952
Admissibility of Superior Equipment Evidence in Maritime Seaworthiness Claims: Doucette v. Vincent et al. Introduction Doucette v. Vincent et al., 194 F.2d 834 (1st Cir. 1952), is a pivotal case in...
Expanding the Boundaries of Attorney-Client Privilege in Corporate Structures: Insights from United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation

Expanding the Boundaries of Attorney-Client Privilege in Corporate Structures: Insights from United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation

Date: Mar 11, 1950
Expanding the Boundaries of Attorney-Client Privilege in Corporate Structures: Insights from United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation Introduction The landmark case of United States v....
Res Judicata and Statute of Limitations in Antitrust Litigation: Analysis of MOMAND v. UNIVERSAL FILM EXCHANGES, Inc.

Res Judicata and Statute of Limitations in Antitrust Litigation: Analysis of MOMAND v. UNIVERSAL FILM EXCHANGES, Inc.

Date: Dec 22, 1948
Res Judicata and Statute of Limitations in Antitrust Litigation: Analysis of MOMAND v. UNIVERSAL FILM EXCHANGES, Inc. Introduction The case of MOMAND v. UNIVERSAL FILM EXCHANGES, Inc., et al. (172...
Constructive Receipt Doctrine Reinforced in Ross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Constructive Receipt Doctrine Reinforced in Ross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Jul 14, 1948
Constructive Receipt Doctrine Reinforced in Ross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Ross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 169 F.2d 483 (First Circuit, 1948), is a pivotal case that...
PARKER v. UNITED STATES: Bankruptcy Discharge and Civil Contempt Fines

PARKER v. UNITED STATES: Bankruptcy Discharge and Civil Contempt Fines

Date: Jan 12, 1946
PARKER v. UNITED STATES: Bankruptcy Discharge and Civil Contempt Fines Introduction PARKER v. UNITED STATES, 153 F.2d 66 (1st Cir. 1946), is a pivotal case addressing the intersection of bankruptcy...
Taxation of Antitrust Damages: Distinguishing Return of Capital from Ordinary Income

Taxation of Antitrust Damages: Distinguishing Return of Capital from Ordinary Income

Date: Nov 21, 1944
Taxation of Antitrust Damages: Distinguishing Return of Capital from Ordinary Income Introduction The case of Raytheon Production Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (144 F.2d 110)...
Establishing the Principles of Severance Damages in Eminent Domain: Baetjer v. United States

Establishing the Principles of Severance Damages in Eminent Domain: Baetjer v. United States

Date: Jun 27, 1944
Establishing the Principles of Severance Damages in Eminent Domain: Baetjer v. United States Introduction The case of Baetjer et al. v. United States, decided on June 26, 1944, by the Circuit Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert