Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Security Agreement Interpretation under UCC: Blank v. Numeric Corp.

Security Agreement Interpretation under UCC: Blank v. Numeric Corp.

Date: Oct 18, 1973
Security Agreement Interpretation under UCC: Blank v. Numeric Corp. Introduction The case of Russell E. Blank v. Numeric Corp. revolves around the enforcement of a security interest under the Uniform...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Whittaker Corp. v. United Aircraft Corp. Case Commentary

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Whittaker Corp. v. United Aircraft Corp. Case Commentary

Date: Jul 24, 1973
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction: Whittaker Corp. v. United Aircraft Corp. Case Commentary Introduction The case of Whittaker Corporation v. United Aircraft Corporation et al., decided by the...
Essential Fulfillment of Prosecutorial Promises in Plea Agreements: Correale v. United States

Essential Fulfillment of Prosecutorial Promises in Plea Agreements: Correale v. United States

Date: Jun 7, 1973
Essential Fulfillment of Prosecutorial Promises in Plea Agreements: Correale v. United States (1973) Introduction In the landmark case of Anthony Correale v. United States of America, decided by the...
Strengthening the Standard for Excusing Demand in Derivative Suits: Insights from In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions

Strengthening the Standard for Excusing Demand in Derivative Suits: Insights from In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions

Date: May 15, 1973
Strengthening the Standard for Excusing Demand in Derivative Suits: Insights from In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions Introduction In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions, 479 F.2d 257 (1st Cir. 1973),...
Enhanced Standards for Granting Bail in Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus Petitions: Glynn v. Donnelly

Enhanced Standards for Granting Bail in Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus Petitions: Glynn v. Donnelly

Date: Dec 13, 1972
Enhanced Standards for Granting Bail in Post-Conviction Habeas Corpus Petitions: Glynn v. Donnelly Introduction In Francis T. Glynn and John M. Farrell v. Robert Donnelly, decided on December 12,...
Joint Representation in Criminal Defense: A New Procedural Safeguard Established in United States v. Javan Foster

Joint Representation in Criminal Defense: A New Procedural Safeguard Established in United States v. Javan Foster

Date: Nov 15, 1972
Joint Representation in Criminal Defense: A New Procedural Safeguard Established in United States v. Javan Foster Introduction United States v. Javan Foster, 469 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1972), is a pivotal...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Corporations Through Fraudulent Misrepresentations: Murphy v. Erwin-Wasey Inc.

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Corporations Through Fraudulent Misrepresentations: Murphy v. Erwin-Wasey Inc.

Date: May 27, 1972
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Corporations Through Fraudulent Misrepresentations: Murphy v. Erwin-Wasey Inc. Introduction Murphy v. Erwin-Wasey, Inc. et al. is a landmark case...
Evaluating Racial Impact in Public Employment: Castro v. Beechner et al. (1972)

Evaluating Racial Impact in Public Employment: Castro v. Beechner et al. (1972)

Date: Apr 27, 1972
Evaluating Racial Impact in Public Employment: Castro v. Beechner et al. (1972) Introduction Castro et al. v. Beechner et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Expanding Class Action Eligibility: Insights from Yaffe v. Powers and Andrade

Expanding Class Action Eligibility: Insights from Yaffe v. Powers and Andrade

Date: Jan 27, 1972
Expanding Class Action Eligibility: Insights from Yaffe v. Powers and Andrade Introduction The case of Erna Yaffe and James Hornsby v. James E. Powers and Ronald Andrade, decided by the United States...
Interpretation of Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b) in Conscientious Objector Cases: Lubben v. Selective Service System

Interpretation of Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b) in Conscientious Objector Cases: Lubben v. Selective Service System

Date: Jan 4, 1972
Interpretation of Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b) in Conscientious Objector Cases: Lubben v. Selective Service System Introduction Lubben v. Selective Service System, Local Board No. 27 et al., 453 F.2d 645...
Limiting Government Use of "Uncontradicted" Evidence in Jury Instructions: The Flannery Decision

Limiting Government Use of "Uncontradicted" Evidence in Jury Instructions: The Flannery Decision

Date: Nov 13, 1971
Limiting Government Use of "Uncontradicted" Evidence in Jury Instructions: The Flannery Decision Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. John Flannery, decided by the United...
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts: Dickstein v. duPont (1971)

Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts: Dickstein v. duPont (1971)

Date: Jun 3, 1971
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts: Dickstein v. duPont (1971) Introduction Merritt Dickstein v. Edmond duPont et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Due Process Mandates Adherence to IRS Procedures in Criminal Investigations: United States v. Alice E. Leahey

Due Process Mandates Adherence to IRS Procedures in Criminal Investigations: United States v. Alice E. Leahey

Date: Oct 8, 1970
Due Process Mandates Adherence to IRS Procedures in Criminal Investigations Introduction United States v. Alice E. Leahey, 434 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1970), marks a significant precedent in the realm of...
Tenants' Lack of Right to Administrative Hearings and Judicial Review in Rent Increases under §221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act

Tenants' Lack of Right to Administrative Hearings and Judicial Review in Rent Increases under §221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act

Date: Aug 15, 1970
Tenants' Lack of Right to Administrative Hearings and Judicial Review in Rent Increases under §221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act Introduction The case of Karl W. Hahn et al. v. Joseph Gottlieb et...
Personal Liberty in School Dress Code Enforcement: Insights from Richards v. Thurston

Personal Liberty in School Dress Code Enforcement: Insights from Richards v. Thurston

Date: Apr 29, 1970
Personal Liberty in School Dress Code Enforcement: Insights from Richards v. Thurston Introduction In Robert Richards, Jr. v. Roger Thurston (424 F.2d 1281, 1970), the United States Court of Appeals...
Clarification of Felonious Intent and Speedy Trial Rights in Federal Bank Robbery Cases

Clarification of Felonious Intent and Speedy Trial Rights in Federal Bank Robbery Cases

Date: Apr 21, 1970
Clarification of Felonious Intent and Speedy Trial Rights in Federal Bank Robbery Cases Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Ralph F. DeLEO, 422 F.2d 487 (1st Cir. 1970), the...
Establishing Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Wrongful Termination Cases

Establishing Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Wrongful Termination Cases

Date: Apr 18, 1970
Establishing Union's Duty of Fair Representation in Wrongful Termination Cases Introduction The case of Rosa M. Figueroa de Arroyo et al. v. Sindicato de Trabajadores Packinghouse, AFL-CIO, et al.,...
Ensuring Non-Discriminatory Federal Jury Selection: Insights from United States v. Butera

Ensuring Non-Discriminatory Federal Jury Selection: Insights from United States v. Butera

Date: Jan 22, 1970
Ensuring Non-Discriminatory Federal Jury Selection: Insights from United States v. Butera Introduction United States of America v. Benjamin J. Butera, 420 F.2d 564 (1st Cir. 1970), addresses critical...
Balancing First Amendment Rights and Conspiracy Law: United States v. Spock et al.

Balancing First Amendment Rights and Conspiracy Law: United States v. Spock et al.

Date: Jul 12, 1969
Balancing First Amendment Rights and Conspiracy Law: United States v. Spock et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Benjamin Spock et al. (1969) presents a pivotal examination of...
Reinforcing the 'Substantial Evidence' Standard in Disability Claims: Insights from Robles v. Finch

Reinforcing the 'Substantial Evidence' Standard in Disability Claims: Insights from Robles v. Finch

Date: Apr 2, 1969
Reinforcing the 'Substantial Evidence' Standard in Disability Claims: Insights from Robles v. Finch Introduction Robles v. Finch, 409 F.2d 84 (1st Cir. 1969), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert