Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Judicial Case Management Authority Over Ordinary Work Product in Complex Multi-District Litigation

Affirmation of Judicial Case Management Authority Over Ordinary Work Product in Complex Multi-District Litigation

Date: Sep 30, 1988
Affirmation of Judicial Case Management Authority Over Ordinary Work Product in Complex Multi-District Litigation Introduction The case of In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation, 859 F.2d...
Public Access to Discovery Materials: Precedent Set in Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Public Access to Discovery Materials: Precedent Set in Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Date: Sep 29, 1988
Public Access to Discovery Materials: Precedent Set in Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Public Citizen, et al., plaintiffs, appellants, v. Liggett Group,...
Reaffirming Non-Finality of Pretrial Cost-Sharing Orders: A Commentary on In Re Recticel Foam Corporation

Reaffirming Non-Finality of Pretrial Cost-Sharing Orders: A Commentary on In Re Recticel Foam Corporation

Date: Sep 21, 1988
Reaffirming Non-Finality of Pretrial Cost-Sharing Orders: A Commentary on In Re Recticel Foam Corporation Introduction The case of In Re Recticel Foam Corporation addresses pivotal issues surrounding...
Clarifying Summary Dismissal Procedures under 8 CFR § 3.1(d)(1-a)(i): Lozada v. INS

Clarifying Summary Dismissal Procedures under 8 CFR § 3.1(d)(1-a)(i): Lozada v. INS

Date: Sep 15, 1988
Clarifying Summary Dismissal Procedures under 8 CFR § 3.1(d)(1-a)(i): Lozada v. INS Introduction Lozada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), 857 F.2d 10 (1st Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case...
Enforcement of IRS Summons and Fifth Amendment Privilege: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Shadoian

Enforcement of IRS Summons and Fifth Amendment Privilege: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Shadoian

Date: Sep 9, 1988
Enforcement of IRS Summons and Fifth Amendment Privilege: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Shadoian Introduction The case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,...
Determining Domicile for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Rodriguez-Diaz v. Sierra-Martinez

Determining Domicile for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Rodriguez-Diaz v. Sierra-Martinez

Date: Aug 11, 1988
Determining Domicile for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Rodriguez-Diaz v. Sierra-Martinez Introduction Rodriguez-Diaz v. Sierra-Martinez is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Defective Jury Instruction on Reasonable Doubt Constitutes Constitutional Error: Lanigan v. Maloney

Defective Jury Instruction on Reasonable Doubt Constitutes Constitutional Error: Lanigan v. Maloney

Date: Aug 10, 1988
Defective Jury Instruction on Reasonable Doubt Constitutes Constitutional Error: Lanigan v. Maloney Introduction Thomas J. Lanigan v. Michael T. Maloney, 853 F.2d 40 (1st Cir. 1988), is a pivotal...
Strengthening Pleading Standards under Rule 12(b)(6): Gooley v. Mobil Oil Corp. Analysis

Strengthening Pleading Standards under Rule 12(b)(6): Gooley v. Mobil Oil Corp. Analysis

Date: Jul 14, 1988
Strengthening Pleading Standards under Rule 12(b)(6): Gooley v. Mobil Oil Corp. Analysis Introduction In Gooley v. Mobil Oil Corporation, 851 F.2d 513 (1st Cir. 1988), the United States Court of...
Limiting Preventive Detention: Insights from United States v. Ploof

Limiting Preventive Detention: Insights from United States v. Ploof

Date: Jul 8, 1988
Limiting Preventive Detention: Insights from United States v. Ploof Introduction United States v. Roger R. Ploof (851 F.2d 7, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 1988) presents a critical...
First Circuit Decision Clarifies Admissibility of Coconspirator Statements in Civil Rights Conspiracy Claims

First Circuit Decision Clarifies Admissibility of Coconspirator Statements in Civil Rights Conspiracy Claims

Date: Jun 30, 1988
First Circuit Decision Clarifies Admissibility of Coconspirator Statements in Civil Rights Conspiracy Claims Introduction In the case of James Earle, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Robert Benoit, et al.,...
Effect on Interstate Commerce Essential for Sherman Act Liability: Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of Realtors

Effect on Interstate Commerce Essential for Sherman Act Liability: Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of Realtors

Date: Jun 24, 1988
Effect on Interstate Commerce Essential for Sherman Act Liability: Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of Realtors Introduction In Wells Real Estate, Inc. v. Greater Lowell Board of...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The Impact of Unfulfilled Expert Testimony Promises - Anderson v. Butler

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The Impact of Unfulfilled Expert Testimony Promises - Anderson v. Butler

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The Impact of Unfulfilled Expert Testimony Promises - Anderson v. Butler Introduction Anderson v. Butler, 858 F.2d 16 (1st Cir. 1988), is a pivotal case addressing...
Mandatory Exhaustion of State Remedies for Federal Habeas Review: Insights from Mele v. Fitchburg District Court

Mandatory Exhaustion of State Remedies for Federal Habeas Review: Insights from Mele v. Fitchburg District Court

Date: Jun 16, 1988
Mandatory Exhaustion of State Remedies for Federal Habeas Review: Insights from Mele v. Fitchburg District Court Introduction Mele v. Fitchburg District Court, 850 F.2d 817 (1st Cir. 1988), addresses...
Clarifying RICO Conspiracy Elements and Electronic Surveillance Standards: Insights from United States v. Angiulo et al.

Clarifying RICO Conspiracy Elements and Electronic Surveillance Standards: Insights from United States v. Angiulo et al.

Date: May 25, 1988
Clarifying RICO Conspiracy Elements and Electronic Surveillance Standards: Insights from United States v. Angiulo et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jason Brion Angiulo,...
Judgment Commentary: Reasonable Allocation of Attorney's Fees in Environmental Litigation

Judgment Commentary: Reasonable Allocation of Attorney's Fees in Environmental Litigation

Date: May 20, 1988
Reasonable Allocation of Attorney's Fees in Environmental Litigation Introduction The case of United States of America v. Metropolitan District Commission et al. adjudicated by the United States...
ERISA Exclusivity Affirmed: Limitations on Damages and Preemption of State Law Claims in Drinkwater v. Metropolitan Life

ERISA Exclusivity Affirmed: Limitations on Damages and Preemption of State Law Claims in Drinkwater v. Metropolitan Life

Date: May 19, 1988
ERISA Exclusivity Affirmed: Limitations on Damages and Preemption of State Law Claims in Drinkwater v. Metropolitan Life Introduction The case of Richard Drinkwater, et al. v. Metropolitan Life...
Speedy Trial Act Interpretation in UNITED STATES v. HASTINGs: A Comprehensive Commentary

Speedy Trial Act Interpretation in UNITED STATES v. HASTINGs: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: May 18, 1988
Speedy Trial Act Interpretation in UNITED STATES v. HASTINGs: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kenneth S. Hastings, adjudicated by the United States...
Affirming Federal Courts' Authority to Impose Provisional Bond Orders and Sanction Litigants for Noncompliance: HMG Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc.

Affirming Federal Courts' Authority to Impose Provisional Bond Orders and Sanction Litigants for Noncompliance: HMG Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc.

Date: May 18, 1988
Affirming Federal Courts' Authority to Impose Provisional Bond Orders and Sanction Litigants for Noncompliance Introduction The case HMG Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc....
Procedural Due Process and Preliminary Injunction Standards in Prisoner Transfer: Insights from Jackson v. Fair, 1st Cir. 1988

Procedural Due Process and Preliminary Injunction Standards in Prisoner Transfer: Insights from Jackson v. Fair, 1st Cir. 1988

Date: May 17, 1988
Procedural Due Process and Preliminary Injunction Standards in Prisoner Transfer: Insights from Jackson v. Fair, 1st Cir. 1988 Introduction In the landmark case of Anthony Jackson v. Michael Fair et...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Disparate Treatment Employment Discrimination Case: Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corporation

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Disparate Treatment Employment Discrimination Case: Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corporation

Date: May 14, 1988
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Disparate Treatment Employment Discrimination Case: Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corporation Introduction In Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corporation, 846 F.2d 103...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert