Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Conspiracy Membership and Hearsay Admissibility: Analysis of United States v. Rivera-Santiago et al. (1989)

Establishing Conspiracy Membership and Hearsay Admissibility: Analysis of United States v. Rivera-Santiago et al. (1989)

Date: Mar 31, 1989
Establishing Conspiracy Membership and Hearsay Admissibility: Analysis of United States v. Rivera-Santiago et al. (1989) Introduction The case of United States of America v. Antonio Rivera-Santiago...
Strict Adherence to Title VII Timeliness and Equitable Tolling: Commentary on Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Strict Adherence to Title VII Timeliness and Equitable Tolling: Commentary on Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Date: Mar 29, 1989
Strict Adherence to Title VII Timeliness and Equitable Tolling: Commentary on Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company Introduction Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea...
First Circuit Rules Automatic Sealing of Non-Conviction Criminal Records Violates First Amendment

First Circuit Rules Automatic Sealing of Non-Conviction Criminal Records Violates First Amendment

Date: Feb 23, 1989
First Circuit Rules Automatic Sealing of Non-Conviction Criminal Records Violates First Amendment Introduction In the landmark case Globe Newspaper Company, et al. v. Daniel F. Pokaski, etc., et al....
Section 1983 Liability Requires Intent or Reckless Indifference, Not Mere Negligence: Germany v. Vance Commentary

Section 1983 Liability Requires Intent or Reckless Indifference, Not Mere Negligence: Germany v. Vance Commentary

Date: Feb 15, 1989
Section 1983 Liability Requires Intent or Reckless Indifference, Not Mere Negligence: Germany v. Vance Commentary Introduction Germany v. Vance, 868 F.2d 9 (1st Cir. 1989), is a pivotal case that...
Coon v. Grenier: Enhanced Criteria for Setting Aside Default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c)

Coon v. Grenier: Enhanced Criteria for Setting Aside Default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c)

Date: Feb 3, 1989
Coon v. Grenier: Enhanced Criteria for Setting Aside Default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c) Introduction In the landmark case of Scott Coon v. Robert P. Grenier, 867 F.2d 73 (1st Cir. 1989), the United...
Application of McNALLY v. UNITED STATES to Mail Fraud Conspiracy: Upholding Convictions under Property Rights Framework

Application of McNALLY v. UNITED STATES to Mail Fraud Conspiracy: Upholding Convictions under Property Rights Framework

Date: Feb 2, 1989
Application of McNALLY v. UNITED STATES to Mail Fraud Conspiracy: Upholding Convictions under Property Rights Framework Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Thomas K....
Protective Sweeps and Fourth Amendment Protections: Insights from United States v. Curzi

Protective Sweeps and Fourth Amendment Protections: Insights from United States v. Curzi

Date: Jan 31, 1989
Protective Sweeps and Fourth Amendment Protections: Insights from United States v. Curzi Introduction United States of America v. Barbara J. Curzi is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Service Mark Protection and Likelihood of Confusion: Insights from Boston Athletic Association v. Sullivan

Service Mark Protection and Likelihood of Confusion: Insights from Boston Athletic Association v. Sullivan

Date: Jan 28, 1989
Service Mark Protection and Likelihood of Confusion: Insights from Boston Athletic Association v. Sullivan Introduction The case Boston Athletic Association, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants v. Mark...
Del Valle Torres v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: Establishing Standards for Disability Determination in Visual Impairments

Del Valle Torres v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: Establishing Standards for Disability Determination in Visual Impairments

Date: Jan 13, 1989
Del Valle Torres v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: Establishing Standards for Disability Determination in Visual Impairments Introduction In the landmark case of Ernesto Del Valle Torres v....
Political Discrimination in Public Employment: Analyzing Figuroa v. Aponte-Roque

Political Discrimination in Public Employment: Analyzing Figuroa v. Aponte-Roque

Date: Jan 5, 1989
Political Discrimination in Public Employment: Analyzing Figuroa v. Aponte-Roque Introduction The case of AURORA FIGUEROA, ET AL. v. HON. AWILDA APONTE-ROQUE, ETC., decided by the United States Court...
Establishing the Limits of Judicial Intervention in Arbitrable Labor Disputes: IOCW v. Procter & Gamble

Establishing the Limits of Judicial Intervention in Arbitrable Labor Disputes: IOCW v. Procter & Gamble

Date: Dec 29, 1988
Establishing the Limits of Judicial Intervention in Arbitrable Labor Disputes: IOCW v. Procter & Gamble Introduction In the landmark case of The Independent Oil and Chemical Workers of Quincy, Inc....
Maritime Law Supremacy in Maritime Torts Over State Comparative Negligence: Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines

Maritime Law Supremacy in Maritime Torts Over State Comparative Negligence: Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines

Date: Dec 21, 1988
Maritime Law Supremacy in Maritime Torts Over State Comparative Negligence: Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines Introduction Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
United States Court of Appeals Establishes Protocol for Federal Tort Claims Act Damages and Technical Advisor Appointments

United States Court of Appeals Establishes Protocol for Federal Tort Claims Act Damages and Technical Advisor Appointments

Date: Dec 15, 1988
United States Court of Appeals Establishes Protocol for Federal Tort Claims Act Damages and Technical Advisor Appointments Introduction In the case of Donna Reilly, Etc., et al. v. United States of...
Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions: Analysis of Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corporation

Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions: Analysis of Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corporation

Date: Dec 9, 1988
Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions: Analysis of Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corporation Introduction The case of Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corporation et al. (862 F.2d 890, 1st Cir. 1988)...
Anderson v. Cryovac: Establishing Standards for Rule 60(b)(3) Relief in Discovery Misconduct Cases

Anderson v. Cryovac: Establishing Standards for Rule 60(b)(3) Relief in Discovery Misconduct Cases

Date: Dec 8, 1988
Anderson v. Cryovac: Establishing Standards for Rule 60(b)(3) Relief in Discovery Misconduct Cases Introduction Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., et al. is a seminal case decided by the United States Court...
Freeman v. Package Machinery Co.: Standards for Jury Verdicts and Statistical Evidence in ADEA Cases

Freeman v. Package Machinery Co.: Standards for Jury Verdicts and Statistical Evidence in ADEA Cases

Date: Nov 23, 1988
Freeman v. Package Machinery Co.: Standards for Jury Verdicts and Statistical Evidence in ADEA Cases Introduction Freeman v. Package Machinery Company is a significant case decided by the United...
Equitable Tolling under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Co. of America

Equitable Tolling under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Co. of America

Date: Nov 18, 1988
Equitable Tolling under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Co. of America Introduction The case of Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America (861 F.2d...
Proper Application of Federal Rule 54(b) and Receiver Appointment Standards Established in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Fore River Railway Co.

Proper Application of Federal Rule 54(b) and Receiver Appointment Standards Established in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Fore River Railway Co.

Date: Nov 17, 1988
Proper Application of Federal Rule 54(b) and Receiver Appointment Standards Established in Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Fore River Railway Co. Introduction The legal landscape surrounding summary...
Establishing Institutional Liability in Sexual Harassment Cases: Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico

Establishing Institutional Liability in Sexual Harassment Cases: Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico

Date: Oct 27, 1988
Establishing Institutional Liability in Sexual Harassment Cases: Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico Introduction Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico was a landmark case adjudicated by...
Establishing the Right to Jury Instruction on Entrapment: United States v. Rodriguez

Establishing the Right to Jury Instruction on Entrapment: United States v. Rodriguez

Date: Oct 8, 1988
Establishing the Right to Jury Instruction on Entrapment: United States v. Rodriguez Introduction United States of America v. Felix Rodriguez (858 F.2d 809, 1st Cir. 1988) addresses significant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert