Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirming Non-Testifying Physicians' Reports in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments: Berrios Lopez v. HHS

Affirming Non-Testifying Physicians' Reports in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments: Berrios Lopez v. HHS

Date: Dec 13, 1991
Affirming Non-Testifying Physicians' Reports in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments: Berrios Lopez v. HHS Introduction In the case of Paulina Berrios Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human...
Substantial Evidence Standard and Impairment Assessment in Disability Benefits: Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Substantial Evidence Standard and Impairment Assessment in Disability Benefits: Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Date: Dec 10, 1991
Substantial Evidence Standard and Impairment Assessment in Disability Benefits Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 955 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1991) Introduction Ortiz v. Secretary of Health...
Strict Enforcement of Appeal Timelines and Limits on Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Contempt: Eck v. Dodge Chemical Co.

Strict Enforcement of Appeal Timelines and Limits on Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Contempt: Eck v. Dodge Chemical Co.

Date: Nov 28, 1991
Strict Enforcement of Appeal Timelines and Limits on Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Contempt: Eck v. Dodge Chemical Co. Introduction The case of David W. Eck v. Dodge Chemical Company presents a...
Clarifying Organizational Leadership and Extensiveness Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a): Commentary on United States v. William A. Dietz

Clarifying Organizational Leadership and Extensiveness Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a): Commentary on United States v. William A. Dietz

Date: Nov 28, 1991
Clarifying Organizational Leadership and Extensiveness Under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a): Commentary on United States v. William A. Dietz Introduction United States of America v. William A. Dietz, 950 F.2d...
ERISA’s Supremacy over State Mechanics' Lien Laws Affirmed in McCoy v. MIT

ERISA’s Supremacy over State Mechanics' Lien Laws Affirmed in McCoy v. MIT

Date: Nov 20, 1991
ERISA’s Supremacy over State Mechanics' Lien Laws Affirmed in McCoy v. MIT Introduction The case of James L. McCoy, Administrator of the Electrical Workers Trust Funds, etc., Plaintiff, Appellant, v....
Exhaustion of State Remedies and Preemption in Federal Habeas Corpus: An Analysis of Tart v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Exhaustion of State Remedies and Preemption in Federal Habeas Corpus: An Analysis of Tart v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Date: Nov 16, 1991
Exhaustion of State Remedies and Preemption in Federal Habeas Corpus: An Analysis of Tart v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Introduction The case of Wesley P. Tart v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts...
Affirmation of Deliberate Indifference Standard in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Medical Care Claims: DesRosiers v. Moran

Affirmation of Deliberate Indifference Standard in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Medical Care Claims: DesRosiers v. Moran

Date: Nov 16, 1991
Affirmation of Deliberate Indifference Standard in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Medical Care Claims: DesRosiers v. Moran Introduction In the landmark case Steven M. DesRosiers v. John J. Moran et al....
Clarissa Miranda v. Ponce Federal Bank: Defining the Boundaries of Civil RICO Claims

Clarissa Miranda v. Ponce Federal Bank: Defining the Boundaries of Civil RICO Claims

Date: Oct 30, 1991
Clarissa Miranda v. Ponce Federal Bank: Defining the Boundaries of Civil RICO Claims Introduction Clarissa Miranda et al. v. Ponce Federal Bank et al., 948 F.2d 41 (1st Cir. 1991), presents a pivotal...
Independent Review and Individualized Analysis in Pretrial Detention: Insights from United States v. Patriarca

Independent Review and Individualized Analysis in Pretrial Detention: Insights from United States v. Patriarca

Date: Oct 29, 1991
Independent Review and Individualized Analysis in Pretrial Detention: Insights from United States v. Patriarca Introduction United States v. Raymond J. Patriarca, 948 F.2d 789 (1st Cir. 1991), is a...
Establishing Municipal Indifference in Police Brutality: Foley v. City of Lowell

Establishing Municipal Indifference in Police Brutality: Foley v. City of Lowell

Date: Oct 24, 1991
Establishing Municipal Indifference in Police Brutality: Foley v. City of Lowell Introduction Foley v. City of Lowell is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Clarity in Judicial Orders: The Project B.A.S.I.C. v. Kemp Contempt Reversal

Clarity in Judicial Orders: The Project B.A.S.I.C. v. Kemp Contempt Reversal

Date: Oct 18, 1991
Clarity in Judicial Orders: The Project B.A.S.I.C. v. Kemp Contempt Reversal Introduction The case of Project B.A.S.I.C., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Jack Kemp, Secretary of Housing and Urban...
Establishing Domicile for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Lundquist v. Precision Valley Aviation

Establishing Domicile for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Lundquist v. Precision Valley Aviation

Date: Oct 2, 1991
Establishing Domicile for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Lundquist v. Precision Valley Aviation Introduction The case of Courtney J. Lundquist v. Precision Valley Aviation, Inc., decided by...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Visual Body Cavity Searches During Prison Emergencies

Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Visual Body Cavity Searches During Prison Emergencies

Date: Sep 27, 1991
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Visual Body Cavity Searches During Prison Emergencies Introduction Cookish v. Powell et al. (945 F.2d 441, 1st Cir. 1991) is a pivotal case that addresses the...
Remand for Comprehensive Evidence Development in Disability Claims: Heggarty v. Sullivan

Remand for Comprehensive Evidence Development in Disability Claims: Heggarty v. Sullivan

Date: Sep 26, 1991
Remand for Comprehensive Evidence Development in Disability Claims: Heggarty v. Sullivan Introduction In Heggarty v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 990 (1st Cir. 1991), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Expectation of Privacy in Non-Owned Vehicle Searches: Analysis of United States v. Sanchez

Expectation of Privacy in Non-Owned Vehicle Searches: Analysis of United States v. Sanchez

Date: Aug 28, 1991
Expectation of Privacy in Non-Owned Vehicle Searches: Analysis of United States v. Sanchez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Erwin Sanchez (943 F.2d 110) examines critical issues...
Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Time-Barred Civil Rights Claims under 28 U.S.C. §1915(d) in Johnson v. Rodriguez et al.

Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Time-Barred Civil Rights Claims under 28 U.S.C. §1915(d) in Johnson v. Rodriguez et al.

Date: Aug 24, 1991
Affirmation of Sua Sponte Dismissal for Time-Barred Civil Rights Claims under 28 U.S.C. §1915(d) in Johnson v. Rodriguez et al. Introduction Johnson v. Rodriguez et al. is a pivotal case decided by...
Exhaustion of Internal Remedies and Jurisdictional Requirements: Insights from Department of Recreation and Sports of Puerto Rico v. World Boxing Association

Exhaustion of Internal Remedies and Jurisdictional Requirements: Insights from Department of Recreation and Sports of Puerto Rico v. World Boxing Association

Date: Aug 22, 1991
Exhaustion of Internal Remedies and Jurisdictional Requirements: Insights from Department of Recreation and Sports of Puerto Rico v. World Boxing Association Introduction The case of Department of...
Qualified Immunity and the Probable Cause Standard in Civil Rights Actions: Prokey v. Watkins

Qualified Immunity and the Probable Cause Standard in Civil Rights Actions: Prokey v. Watkins

Date: Aug 20, 1991
Qualified Immunity and the Probable Cause Standard in Civil Rights Actions: Prokey v. Watkins Introduction In Gloria Prokey v. George Watkins et al., decided on August 19, 1991, by the United States...
Reinforcing Pleading Requirements for RICO Claims: Feinstein v. Resolution Trust Corp. (1st Cir. 1991)

Reinforcing Pleading Requirements for RICO Claims: Feinstein v. Resolution Trust Corp. (1st Cir. 1991)

Date: Aug 14, 1991
Reinforcing Pleading Requirements for RICO Claims: Feinstein v. Resolution Trust Corp. (1st Cir. 1991) Introduction Feinstein et al. v. Resolution Trust Corporation et al. is a pivotal case...
Protected Liberty Interests in Prison Administrative Transfers: Analysis of Rodi v. Ventetuolo

Protected Liberty Interests in Prison Administrative Transfers: Analysis of Rodi v. Ventetuolo

Date: Aug 6, 1991
Protected Liberty Interests in Prison Administrative Transfers: Analysis of Rodi v. Ventetuolo Introduction Rodi v. Ventetuolo, et al., 941 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1991), is a landmark case in which the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert