Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Validating IRS Tax Liens and Appellate Jurisdiction: Analysis of Geiselman v. United States

Validating IRS Tax Liens and Appellate Jurisdiction: Analysis of Geiselman v. United States

Date: Apr 1, 1992
Validating IRS Tax Liens and Appellate Jurisdiction: Analysis of Geiselman v. United States Introduction The case of Michael J. Geiselman, et al. v. United States of America, et al., adjudicated by...
Enforcement of FRCP 26(e): Preclusion of Expert Testimony for Late Discovery Compliance

Enforcement of FRCP 26(e): Preclusion of Expert Testimony for Late Discovery Compliance

Date: Mar 31, 1992
Enforcement of FRCP 26(e): Preclusion of Expert Testimony for Late Discovery Compliance Introduction In the case of Charles M. Thibeault v. Square D Company, decided by the United States Court of...
Classification of Felon-in-Possession as a Non-Violent Felony under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)

Classification of Felon-in-Possession as a Non-Violent Felony under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)

Date: Mar 31, 1992
Classification of Felon-in-Possession as a Non-Violent Felony under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) Introduction The case of United States v. Arthur L. Doe (960 F.2d 221) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Strict Personal Jurisdiction and Veil-Piercing Standards Affirmed in ERISA Litigation against Foreign Parent Corporations

Strict Personal Jurisdiction and Veil-Piercing Standards Affirmed in ERISA Litigation against Foreign Parent Corporations

Date: Mar 31, 1992
Strict Personal Jurisdiction and Veil-Piercing Standards Affirmed in ERISA Litigation against Foreign Parent Corporations Introduction In the landmark case of United Electrical, Radio and Machine...
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Employment Termination Case

Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Employment Termination Case

Date: Mar 24, 1992
Affirmation of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Employment Termination Case Introduction The case of Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-Alicea et al. (959 F.2d 349) revolves around the...
Comprehensive Commentary on U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property (1992)

Comprehensive Commentary on U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property (1992)

Date: Mar 13, 1992
First Circuit Upholds Civil Forfeiture of Property Used in Marijuana Cultivation and Denies EAJA Fees to Innocent Owners Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. One Parcel of...
Deliberate Indifference and Municipal Liability Under Section 1983: Insights from Manarite v. City of Springfield

Deliberate Indifference and Municipal Liability Under Section 1983: Insights from Manarite v. City of Springfield

Date: Mar 6, 1992
Deliberate Indifference and Municipal Liability Under Section 1983: Insights from Manarite v. City of Springfield Introduction Manarite v. City of Springfield is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
First Circuit Establishes Contractor Obligation in Joint Lending Agreements

First Circuit Establishes Contractor Obligation in Joint Lending Agreements

Date: Mar 6, 1992
First Circuit Establishes Contractor Obligation in Joint Lending Agreements Introduction In the landmark case Garita Hotel Limited Partnership v. Ponce Federal Bank, the United States Court of...
Sentencing Enhancement and Guideline Amendments in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Connell

Sentencing Enhancement and Guideline Amendments in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Connell

Date: Feb 27, 1992
Sentencing Enhancement and Guideline Amendments in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Connell Introduction United States of America v. Gerald Connell, 960 F.2d 191 (1st Cir. 1992),...
Qualified Immunity for Contracted State Actors in Parental Rights Interference: Frazier v. Bailey

Qualified Immunity for Contracted State Actors in Parental Rights Interference: Frazier v. Bailey

Date: Feb 25, 1992
Qualified Immunity for Contracted State Actors in Parental Rights Interference: Frazier v. Bailey Introduction Frazier v. Bailey is a significant case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Appellate Review of Counterclaims and Fraudulent Concealment Standards: Insights from Putnam Resources v. Pateman

Appellate Review of Counterclaims and Fraudulent Concealment Standards: Insights from Putnam Resources v. Pateman

Date: Feb 21, 1992
Appellate Review of Counterclaims and Fraudulent Concealment Standards: Insights from Putnam Resources v. Pateman Introduction Putnam Resources, Ltd., a Connecticut-based precious metals vendor,...
Estoppel and Statutory Penalties under ERISA: Analysis of Donald Law v. Ernst Young

Estoppel and Statutory Penalties under ERISA: Analysis of Donald Law v. Ernst Young

Date: Feb 13, 1992
Estoppel and Statutory Penalties under ERISA: Analysis of Donald Law v. Ernst Young Introduction Donald Law v. Ernst Young, etc., 956 F.2d 364 (1st Cir. 1992) is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Clarifying Scope of Employment and Discretionary Function Exceptions in FTCA Claims: Attallah v. United States

Clarifying Scope of Employment and Discretionary Function Exceptions in FTCA Claims: Attallah v. United States

Date: Feb 6, 1992
Clarifying Scope of Employment and Discretionary Function Exceptions in FTCA Claims: Attallah v. United States Introduction The case of Elias Attallah, Violeta Lajam de Attallah, and the Conjugal...
Reaffirming the Burdens of Proof in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: In Re Philip N. Burgess, Jr.

Reaffirming the Burdens of Proof in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: In Re Philip N. Burgess, Jr.

Date: Feb 1, 1992
Reaffirming the Burdens of Proof in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: In Re Philip N. Burgess, Jr. Introduction The case of In Re Philip N. Burgess, Jr. involves complex bankruptcy proceedings in...
Woburn Associates v. Herbert C. Kahn: Clarifying the Scope of Administrative Expense Priority for Prepetition Indemnification Claims in Chapter 7 Liquidations

Woburn Associates v. Herbert C. Kahn: Clarifying the Scope of Administrative Expense Priority for Prepetition Indemnification Claims in Chapter 7 Liquidations

Date: Jan 17, 1992
Woburn Associates v. Herbert C. Kahn: Clarifying the Scope of Administrative Expense Priority for Prepetition Indemnification Claims in Chapter 7 Liquidations Introduction The case of Woburn...
Protected Expressions of Opinion in Defamation: Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications

Protected Expressions of Opinion in Defamation: Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications

Date: Jan 11, 1992
Protected Expressions of Opinion in Defamation: Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications Introduction In Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, et al., the United States Court of...
Affirmation of the Requirement for a Meritorious Claim in Rule 60(b)(6) Motions: Teamsters v. Superline Transportation Co.

Affirmation of the Requirement for a Meritorious Claim in Rule 60(b)(6) Motions: Teamsters v. Superline Transportation Co.

Date: Jan 8, 1992
Affirmation of the Requirement for a Meritorious Claim in Rule 60(b)(6) Motions: Teamsters v. Superline Transportation Co. Introduction The case of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers...
Affirmation of ALJ’s Residual Functional Capacity Assessment in Social Security Disability Determination

Affirmation of ALJ’s Residual Functional Capacity Assessment in Social Security Disability Determination

Date: Dec 31, 1991
Affirmation of ALJ’s Residual Functional Capacity Assessment in Social Security Disability Determination Introduction In the landmark case of Ramonita Cintron Perez v. Secretary of Health and Human...
Clarifying the Boundaries of "Sufficient Excuse" in Bail-Jumping Statutes: Insights from Love v. Butler

Clarifying the Boundaries of "Sufficient Excuse" in Bail-Jumping Statutes: Insights from Love v. Butler

Date: Dec 20, 1991
Clarifying the Boundaries of "Sufficient Excuse" in Bail-Jumping Statutes: Insights from Love v. Butler Introduction Alvin Love v. Norman Butler is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in MESNICK v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.: Clarifying the Burden-Shifting Framework under ADEA and Rule 56

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in MESNICK v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.: Clarifying the Burden-Shifting Framework under ADEA and Rule 56

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in MESNICK v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.: Clarifying the Burden-Shifting Framework under ADEA and Rule 56 Introduction In MESNICK v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COmpany, 950 F.2d 816...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert