Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Overriding Attorney-Client Privilege in Tax Evasion Cases: Analysis of IN RE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION, Appeal of Glen J. Schroeder, Jr.

Overriding Attorney-Client Privilege in Tax Evasion Cases: Analysis of IN RE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION, Appeal of Glen J. Schroeder, Jr.

Date: May 21, 1987
Overriding Attorney-Client Privilege in Tax Evasion Cases: Analysis of IN RE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION, Appeal of Glen J. Schroeder, Jr. Introduction The case of IN RE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. Appeal...
Expanding Article III Standing in Forfeiture Actions: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. English

Expanding Article III Standing in Forfeiture Actions: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. English

Date: May 19, 1987
Expanding Article III Standing in Forfeiture Actions: The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in United States v. English Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. $38,000.00 in United...
Defining Debtor Control in §548 Fraudulent Transfers: Chase Sanborn Corp. v. Sanchez

Defining Debtor Control in §548 Fraudulent Transfers: Chase Sanborn Corp. v. Sanchez

Date: May 9, 1987
Defining Debtor Control in §548 Fraudulent Transfers: Chase Sanborn Corp. v. Sanchez Introduction Chase Sanborn Corporation v. Sanchez (813 F.2d 1177, 11th Cir. 1987) is a pivotal case in bankruptcy...
Assessment of Residual Functional Capacity in Disability Claims: The Schnorr v. Bowen Decision

Assessment of Residual Functional Capacity in Disability Claims: The Schnorr v. Bowen Decision

Date: May 8, 1987
Assessment of Residual Functional Capacity in Disability Claims: The Schnorr v. Bowen Decision Introduction John Schnorr v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Dock Brown v. Charles Smith: Establishing Standards for §1983 Claims in Correctional Facilities

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Dock Brown v. Charles Smith: Establishing Standards for §1983 Claims in Correctional Facilities

Date: May 6, 1987
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Dock Brown v. Charles Smith: Establishing Standards for §1983 Claims in Correctional Facilities Introduction The case of Dock Brown v. Charles Smith, et al....
Invalidation of 1979 Medicare Malpractice Reimbursement Rule: Insights from Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen

Invalidation of 1979 Medicare Malpractice Reimbursement Rule: Insights from Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen

Date: May 6, 1987
Invalidation of the 1979 Medicare Malpractice Reimbursement Rule: Comprehensive Commentary on Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen 1. Introduction The case of Tallahassee Memorial...
Balancing Prison Discipline and Eighth Amendment Protections: Ort v. White

Balancing Prison Discipline and Eighth Amendment Protections: Ort v. White

Date: May 6, 1987
Balancing Prison Discipline and Eighth Amendment Protections: Ort v. White Introduction The case of Anthony Ort v. Wardens and Officers (813 F.2d 318, 1987) addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Trade Dress Infringement and Cancels Abandoned Trademark in Isaly v. Kraft

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Trade Dress Infringement and Cancels Abandoned Trademark in Isaly v. Kraft

Date: May 5, 1987
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Trade Dress Infringement and Cancels Abandoned Trademark in Isaly v. Kraft Introduction The case of AmBrit, Inc., f/k/a The Isaly Company, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc. (812 F.2d 1531)...
Smith v. White: Establishing Standards for Successive Representation and Conflict of Interest in Federal Habeas Corpus

Smith v. White: Establishing Standards for Successive Representation and Conflict of Interest in Federal Habeas Corpus

Date: May 2, 1987
Smith v. White: Establishing Standards for Successive Representation and Conflict of Interest in Federal Habeas Corpus Introduction Smith v. White is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Legitimacy of Privacy Expectation in Carry-On Luggage Amid Drug Trafficking Investigation: McKennon v. United States

Legitimacy of Privacy Expectation in Carry-On Luggage Amid Drug Trafficking Investigation: McKennon v. United States

Date: Apr 21, 1987
Legitimacy of Privacy Expectation in Carry-On Luggage Amid Drug Trafficking Investigation: McKennon v. United States Introduction McKennon v. United States (814 F.2d 1539) is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Fourth Amendment Protections and Clarification on Qualified Immunity in Lundgren v. McDaniel et al.

Affirmation of Fourth Amendment Protections and Clarification on Qualified Immunity in Lundgren v. McDaniel et al.

Date: Apr 14, 1987
Affirmation of Fourth Amendment Protections and Clarification on Qualified Immunity in Lundgren v. McDaniel et al. Introduction Lundgren v. McDaniel et al. (814 F.2d 600, 1987) is a pivotal case in...
Comprehensive Analysis of Jamison v. Bowen: Mandating Holistic Consideration in Disability Determinations

Comprehensive Analysis of Jamison v. Bowen: Mandating Holistic Consideration in Disability Determinations

Date: Apr 14, 1987
Comprehensive Analysis of Jamison v. Bowen: Mandating Holistic Consideration in Disability Determinations Introduction In the landmark case of Mamie L. Jamison v. Otis R. Bowen, adjudicated by the...
Reinforcement of Rule 60(b)(6) in the Context of Supervening Legal Developments: The RITTER v. SMITH Decision

Reinforcement of Rule 60(b)(6) in the Context of Supervening Legal Developments: The RITTER v. SMITH Decision

Date: Apr 14, 1987
Reinforcement of Rule 60(b)(6) in the Context of Supervening Legal Developments: The RITTER v. SMITH Decision Introduction RITTER v. SMITH, 811 F.2d 1398 (11th Cir. 1987), is a pivotal case that...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Barnes v. Southwest Forest Industries: Reinforcing Standards for Age Discrimination in Workforce Reductions

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Barnes v. Southwest Forest Industries: Reinforcing Standards for Age Discrimination in Workforce Reductions

Date: Apr 14, 1987
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Barnes v. Southwest Forest Industries: Reinforcing Standards for Age Discrimination in Workforce Reductions Introduction The case of Grady Allen Barnes, Billy...
Single Conspiracy Affirmed in United States v. Champion et al. (1987)

Single Conspiracy Affirmed in United States v. Champion et al. (1987)

Date: Apr 7, 1987
Single Conspiracy Affirmed in United States v. Champion et al. (1987) Introduction The case of United States of America v. Stanford Champion, Gene Slusser, Eldon L. Morgan, Jr., Lester Spainhoward,...
Reversal of Municipal Immunity in Police Misconduct Claims: Insights from Brooks v. Scheib

Reversal of Municipal Immunity in Police Misconduct Claims: Insights from Brooks v. Scheib

Date: Apr 7, 1987
Reversal of Municipal Immunity in Police Misconduct Claims: Insights from Brooks v. Scheib Introduction In the landmark case James R. Brooks v. D.R. Scheib, et al., City of Atlanta, adjudicated by...
Wilcox v. Ford: Establishing Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence and Police Conduct in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Wilcox v. Ford: Establishing Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence and Police Conduct in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Apr 4, 1987
Wilcox v. Ford: Establishing Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence and Police Conduct in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction The case of E.K. Wilcox, Jr. v. J. Paul Ford, reported in 813 F.2d 1140...
Indemnity Clause Interpretation in Caryl Antony Vaughn Gibbs v. Air Canada

Indemnity Clause Interpretation in Caryl Antony Vaughn Gibbs v. Air Canada

Date: Apr 3, 1987
Indemnity Clause Interpretation in Caryl Antony Vaughn Gibbs v. Air Canada Introduction The case of Caryl Antony Vaughn Gibbs, and Other Underwriters, Etc., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Air Canada,...
Expansion of "Counterfeit Mark" Definition under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act

Expansion of "Counterfeit Mark" Definition under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act

Date: Mar 21, 1987
Expansion of "Counterfeit Mark" Definition under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act Introduction The case of United States of America v. John Torkington (812 F.2d 1347) adjudicated by the United States...
Bridges v. Bowen: Establishing the "Slight Abnormality" Threshold in Disability Determinations

Bridges v. Bowen: Establishing the "Slight Abnormality" Threshold in Disability Determinations

Date: Mar 19, 1987
Bridges v. Bowen: Establishing the "Slight Abnormality" Threshold in Disability Determinations Introduction Eddie Bridges, the plaintiff-appellant, filed a lawsuit against Otis R. Bowen, the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert