Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Impact of Trial Management and Prosecutorial Conduct on Fair Trial Rights: United States v. McLain and Sher

Impact of Trial Management and Prosecutorial Conduct on Fair Trial Rights: United States v. McLain and Sher

Date: Aug 8, 1987
Impact of Trial Management and Prosecutorial Conduct on Fair Trial Rights: United States v. McLain and Sher Introduction The case of United States of America v. Dennis McLain and Seymour Sher,...
Hyde v. Bowen: Remand for Consideration of New Evidence in Disability Benefits Claims

Hyde v. Bowen: Remand for Consideration of New Evidence in Disability Benefits Claims

Date: Aug 4, 1987
Hyde v. Bowen: Remand for Consideration of New Evidence in Disability Benefits Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Harlan E. Hyde v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services,...
Proper Weighting of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Claims: Sharfarz v. Bowen

Proper Weighting of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Claims: Sharfarz v. Bowen

Date: Aug 1, 1987
Proper Weighting of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Claims: Sharfarz v. Bowen Introduction Benjamin Sharfarz v. Otis R. Bowen, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
United States v. Elledge: New Standards for Defendant Shackling in Sentencing Proceedings

United States v. Elledge: New Standards for Defendant Shackling in Sentencing Proceedings

Date: Jul 21, 1987
United States v. Elledge: New Standards for Defendant Shackling in Sentencing Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. William Duane Elledge, decided by the United States...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Jurisdiction When Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims Meet Controversy Threshold

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Jurisdiction When Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims Meet Controversy Threshold

Date: Jul 21, 1987
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Jurisdiction When Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims Meet Controversy Threshold Introduction The case of Holley Equipment Company v. Credit Alliance Corporation, decided...
Comprehensive Commentary on Wilkinson v. Bowen: Interpretation of SSI Impairment Listings

Comprehensive Commentary on Wilkinson v. Bowen: Interpretation of SSI Impairment Listings

Date: Jul 16, 1987
Comprehensive Commentary on Wilkinson v. Bowen: Interpretation of SSI Impairment Listings Introduction Wilkinson v. Bowen is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reinforcing Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination: Grigsby v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Reinforcing Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination: Grigsby v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Date: Jul 16, 1987
Reinforcing Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination: Grigsby v. Reynolds Metals Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Grigsby v. Reynolds Metals Company, decided by the United...
Limits of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims and Attorneys' Fees Allocation under Section 1988: A Comprehensive Analysis of Popham v. City of Kennesaw

Limits of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims and Attorneys' Fees Allocation under Section 1988: A Comprehensive Analysis of Popham v. City of Kennesaw

Date: Jul 16, 1987
Limits of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims and Attorneys' Fees Allocation under Section 1988: A Comprehensive Analysis of Popham v. City of Kennesaw Introduction The legal landscape...
Reevaluation of Disabling Pain Standards in Social Security Disability Claims

Reevaluation of Disabling Pain Standards in Social Security Disability Claims

Date: Jul 15, 1987
Reevaluation of Disabling Pain Standards in Social Security Disability Claims Introduction Joyce M. Johns v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 821 F.2d 551 (11th Cir. 1987),...
Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver at Trial Following Pretrial Consent: Suarez v. United States

Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver at Trial Following Pretrial Consent: Suarez v. United States

Date: Jul 3, 1987
Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver at Trial Following Pretrial Consent: Suarez v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Richard Suarez (820 F.2d 1158) was adjudicated by...
Establishing Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Borrowed Vehicles: Insights from United States v. Miller

Establishing Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Borrowed Vehicles: Insights from United States v. Miller

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Establishing Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Borrowed Vehicles: Insights from United States v. Miller Introduction United States v. Miller, 821 F.2d 546 (11th Cir. 1987), serves as a pivotal...
Affirmation of Protective Orders Limiting Non-Party Access to Discovery Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c): In re Alexander Grant Co. Litigation

Affirmation of Protective Orders Limiting Non-Party Access to Discovery Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c): In re Alexander Grant Co. Litigation

Date: Jun 25, 1987
Affirmation of Protective Orders Limiting Non-Party Access to Discovery Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c): In re Alexander Grant Co. Litigation Introduction The case of In re Alexander Grant Co. Litigation,...
Establishing Procedural Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Analysis of DONALDSON v. CLARK

Establishing Procedural Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Analysis of DONALDSON v. CLARK

Date: Jun 25, 1987
Establishing Procedural Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Analysis of DONALDSON v. CLARK Introduction DONALDSON v. CLARK, 819 F.2d 1551 (11th Cir. 1987), is a pivotal case addressing the procedural...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jurisdiction Over Assimilated Stateless Vessel and Admissibility of Coconspirator Statements

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jurisdiction Over Assimilated Stateless Vessel and Admissibility of Coconspirator Statements

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jurisdiction Over Assimilated Stateless Vessel and Admissibility of Coconspirator Statements Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Carmelo...
Tucker v. Phyfer: Clarifying Mootness in Class Action Certification

Tucker v. Phyfer: Clarifying Mootness in Class Action Certification

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Tucker v. Phyfer: Clarifying Mootness in Class Action Certification Introduction Tucker v. Phyfer, 819 F.2d 1030 (11th Cir. 1987), is a pivotal case addressing the issues of mootness and standing in...
Proper Consideration of Procedural Rights in §1983 Prisoner Litigation: Poole v. Lambert

Proper Consideration of Procedural Rights in §1983 Prisoner Litigation: Poole v. Lambert

Date: Jun 20, 1987
Proper Consideration of Procedural Rights in §1983 Prisoner Litigation: Poole v. Lambert Introduction Reginald Lacroix Poole v. Lambert (819 F.2d 1025) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Procedural Bars and Habeas Corpus Limitations in Lindsey v. Smith: An In-Depth Analysis

Procedural Bars and Habeas Corpus Limitations in Lindsey v. Smith: An In-Depth Analysis

Date: Jun 13, 1987
Procedural Bars and Habeas Corpus Limitations in Lindsey v. Smith: An In-Depth Analysis Introduction In the landmark case Michael Lindsey v. Fred Smith, 820 F.2d 1137 (11th Cir. 1987), the United...
Establishing Liability for Deliberate Indifference in Foster Care: Taylor v. Ledbetter et al.

Establishing Liability for Deliberate Indifference in Foster Care: Taylor v. Ledbetter et al.

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Establishing Liability for Deliberate Indifference in Foster Care: Taylor v. Ledbetter et al. Introduction Taylor v. Ledbetter et al., 818 F.2d 791 (11th Cir. 1987), is a landmark appellate decision...
Immunity and Statute of Limitations in Prosecutorial Conduct: Analysis of Mullinax v. McElhenney

Immunity and Statute of Limitations in Prosecutorial Conduct: Analysis of Mullinax v. McElhenney

Date: May 27, 1987
Immunity and Statute of Limitations in Prosecutorial Conduct: Analysis of Mullinax v. McElhenney Introduction The case of Dianne Mullinax v. E.B. McElhenney, et al. (817 F.2d 711, 11th Cir. 1987)...
Implied Consent in Mistrial Declarations and Double Jeopardy: United States v. Puleo

Implied Consent in Mistrial Declarations and Double Jeopardy: United States v. Puleo

Date: May 27, 1987
Implied Consent in Mistrial Declarations and Double Jeopardy: United States v. Puleo Introduction United States of America v. Cheryl Lynne Puleo, 817 F.2d 702 (11th Cir. 1987), is a significant case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert