Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Commercial Unreasonableness in Bank Depository Practices: Insights from Apcoa v. Fidelity

Commercial Unreasonableness in Bank Depository Practices: Insights from Apcoa v. Fidelity

Date: Jul 20, 1990
Commercial Unreasonableness in Bank Depository Practices: Insights from Apcoa v. Fidelity 1. Introduction The case of Apcoa, Inc. and Federal Insurance Company v. Fidelity National Bank delves into...
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Section 1983 Claims: MARX v. GUMBINNER

Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Section 1983 Claims: MARX v. GUMBINNER

Date: Jul 14, 1990
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Section 1983 Claims: MARX v. GUMBINNER Introduction MARX v. GUMBINNER, 905 F.2d 1503 (11th Cir. 1990), is a pivotal case addressing the interplay between...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Title VII Protection Against Discriminatory Maternity Leave Policies in Pan American World Airways Case

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Title VII Protection Against Discriminatory Maternity Leave Policies in Pan American World Airways Case

Date: Jul 14, 1990
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Title VII Protection Against Discriminatory Maternity Leave Policies in Pan American World Airways Case Introduction The case of In Re Pan American World Airways, Inc....
Affirming Mail Fraud Convictions: Authentication, Hearsay, and Evidence Sufficiency in Hawkins v. United States

Affirming Mail Fraud Convictions: Authentication, Hearsay, and Evidence Sufficiency in Hawkins v. United States

Date: Jul 14, 1990
Affirming Mail Fraud Convictions: Authentication, Hearsay, and Evidence Sufficiency in Hawkins v. United States Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Damian Hawkins and Peter...
Enforcing Clear Immunity Agreements: An Analysis of United States v. Weaver and Sikes

Enforcing Clear Immunity Agreements: An Analysis of United States v. Weaver and Sikes

Date: Jul 14, 1990
Enforcing Clear Immunity Agreements: An Analysis of United States v. Weaver and Sikes Introduction The case of United States of America v. John Weaver, Thomas D. Sikes (905 F.2d 1466) adjudicated by...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Burden-Shifting in Disparate Treatment under Title VII – Caban-Wheeler v. Elsea

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Burden-Shifting in Disparate Treatment under Title VII – Caban-Wheeler v. Elsea

Date: Jul 11, 1990
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Burden-Shifting in Disparate Treatment under Title VII – Caban-Wheeler v. Elsea Introduction ALICIA CABAN-WHEELER v. WILLIAM ELSEA, M.D., FULTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT,...
Res Judicata and Vicarious Liability: The Preclusive Effect of Dismissal of Third-Party Claims in Citibank v. Data Lease

Res Judicata and Vicarious Liability: The Preclusive Effect of Dismissal of Third-Party Claims in Citibank v. Data Lease

Date: Jul 6, 1990
Res Judicata and Vicarious Liability: The Preclusive Effect of Dismissal of Third-Party Claims in Citibank v. Data Lease Introduction The case of CITIBANK, N.A. v. DATA LEASE FINANCIAL CORPoration...
Retroactive Application of the Civil Rights Restoration Act: Insights from Lussier v. Dugger et al.

Retroactive Application of the Civil Rights Restoration Act: Insights from Lussier v. Dugger et al.

Date: Jul 3, 1990
Retroactive Application of the Civil Rights Restoration Act: Insights from Lussier v. Dugger et al. Introduction In Maurice G. Lussier v. Richard Dugger, et al., 904 F.2d 661 (11th Cir. 1990), the...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Probable Cause in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Von Stein v. Brescher

Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Probable Cause in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Von Stein v. Brescher

Date: Jun 28, 1990
Clarifying Qualified Immunity and Probable Cause in Section 1983 Claims: Insights from Von Stein v. Brescher Introduction In Charles H. Von Stein v. George A. Brescher, et al., 904 F.2d 572 (11th...
IN RE CHASE SANBORN CORP.: Advancing the Interpretation of 'New Value' and 'Initial Transferee' in Bankruptcy Code §§547 and 550

IN RE CHASE SANBORN CORP.: Advancing the Interpretation of 'New Value' and 'Initial Transferee' in Bankruptcy Code §§547 and 550

Date: Jun 28, 1990
IN RE CHASE SANBORN CORP.: Advancing the Interpretation of 'New Value' and 'Initial Transferee' in Bankruptcy Code §§547 and 550 1. Introduction The case of IN RE CHASE SANBORN CORPoration, Debtor....
Affirmation of Arbitrary and Capricious Standard for NEPA Compliance: Insights from North Buckhead Civic Association v. Skinner

Affirmation of Arbitrary and Capricious Standard for NEPA Compliance: Insights from North Buckhead Civic Association v. Skinner

Date: Jun 27, 1990
Affirmation of Arbitrary and Capricious Standard for NEPA Compliance: Insights from North Buckhead Civic Association v. Skinner Introduction The case of North Buckhead Civic Association, et al. v....
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine in Copyright Infringement

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine in Copyright Infringement

Date: Jun 26, 1990
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine in Copyright Infringement Introduction The case of M.G.B. Homes, Inc. v. Ameron Homes, Inc., decided on June 25, 1990, by the United States Court...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Reinforced in Schopler v. Bliss

Eleventh Amendment Immunity Reinforced in Schopler v. Bliss

Date: Jun 23, 1990
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Reinforced in Schopler v. Bliss Introduction Schopler v. Bliss, 903 F.2d 1373 (11th Cir. 1990), is a landmark case that delves into the complexities of sovereign immunity...
Alan’s of Atlanta v. Minolta: Appellate Reversal Emphasizes Genuine Issues in Robinson-Patman Act Price Discrimination

Alan’s of Atlanta v. Minolta: Appellate Reversal Emphasizes Genuine Issues in Robinson-Patman Act Price Discrimination

Date: Jun 23, 1990
Alan’s of Atlanta v. Minolta: Appellate Reversal Emphasizes Genuine Issues in Robinson-Patman Act Price Discrimination Introduction The case of Alan's of Atlanta, Inc. v. Minolta Corporation (903...
Oral Sentences Dominate Over Written Orders in Sentencing Ambiguities: Insights from United States v. Khoury

Oral Sentences Dominate Over Written Orders in Sentencing Ambiguities: Insights from United States v. Khoury

Date: Jun 8, 1990
Oral Sentences Dominate Over Written Orders in Sentencing Ambiguities: Insights from United States v. Khoury Introduction The case of United States of America v. George M. Khoury, 901 F.2d 975 (11th...
Fourth Amendment Implications in Drug Conspiracy Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Kluver

Fourth Amendment Implications in Drug Conspiracy Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Kluver

Date: Jun 8, 1990
Fourth Amendment Implications in Drug Conspiracy Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Kluver Introduction United States v. Kluver, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Expansion of Consent in Vehicle Searches: The Strickland v. United States Case

Expansion of Consent in Vehicle Searches: The Strickland v. United States Case

Date: Jun 6, 1990
Expansion of Consent in Vehicle Searches: The Strickland v. United States Case Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Walter George Strickland, Jr., 902 F.2d 937 (11th Cir....
Waiver of Insufficiency of Process Defense Due to Defective Summons: Sanderford v. Prudential Insurance Company

Waiver of Insufficiency of Process Defense Due to Defective Summons: Sanderford v. Prudential Insurance Company

Date: Jun 6, 1990
Waiver of Insufficiency of Process Defense Due to Defective Summons: Sanderford v. Prudential Insurance Company Introduction In the landmark case of Lee Y. Sanderford and Ella V. Yarborough v....
Limiting Dismissals with Prejudice in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Insights from Matthews v. Gaither

Limiting Dismissals with Prejudice in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Insights from Matthews v. Gaither

Date: Jun 5, 1990
Limiting Dismissals with Prejudice in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Insights from Matthews v. Gaither Introduction The case of Roland Markland Matthews v. Barry K. Gaither, et al. (902 F.2d 877) presents...
Attorney’s Fees in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In Re Red Carpet Corporation of Panama City Beach

Attorney’s Fees in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In Re Red Carpet Corporation of Panama City Beach

Date: Jun 5, 1990
Attorney’s Fees in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In Re Red Carpet Corporation of Panama City Beach Introduction In Re Red Carpet Corporation of Panama City Beach, Debtor. Jimmy Hatcher v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert