Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Unauthorized Interception Claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2520

Eleventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Unauthorized Interception Claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2520

Date: Sep 21, 1990
Eleventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Unauthorized Interception Claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Introduction In the case of Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth...
STONE v. POWELL Doctrine Reinforced: Limiting Federal Habeas Review on Fourth Amendment Claims

STONE v. POWELL Doctrine Reinforced: Limiting Federal Habeas Review on Fourth Amendment Claims

Date: Sep 8, 1990
STONE v. POWELL Doctrine Reinforced: Limiting Federal Habeas Review on Fourth Amendment Claims Introduction In John T. Tukes v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, the United...
Hector Orozco v. INS: Limitations on Incarcerated Aliens' Right to Habeas Corpus

Hector Orozco v. INS: Limitations on Incarcerated Aliens' Right to Habeas Corpus

Date: Sep 8, 1990
Hector Orozco v. INS: Limitations on Incarcerated Aliens' Right to Habeas Corpus Introduction The case of Hector Orozco v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) addresses a...
Defining Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Post-Asset Disposition: Miller Resources v. Kemira

Defining Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Post-Asset Disposition: Miller Resources v. Kemira

Date: Sep 7, 1990
Defining Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Post-Asset Disposition: Miller Resources v. Kemira Introduction In the landmark case of Miller Resources, Inc. v. Kemira, Inc. (910 F.2d 784), the United States...
Reaffirming Strickland Standards and Hearsay Limits in Capital Sentencing: CARD v. DUGGER (1990)

Reaffirming Strickland Standards and Hearsay Limits in Capital Sentencing: CARD v. DUGGER (1990)

Date: Sep 5, 1990
Reaffirming Strickland Standards and Hearsay Limits in Capital Sentencing: CARD v. DUGGER (1990) Introduction In the landmark case of James Armando Card, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard L. Dugger,...
Bendiburg v. Dempsey: Establishing Precedents in Procedural Due Process and State Liability

Bendiburg v. Dempsey: Establishing Precedents in Procedural Due Process and State Liability

Date: Aug 21, 1990
Bendiburg v. Dempsey: Establishing Precedents in Procedural Due Process and State Liability Introduction Bendiburg v. Dempsey is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Suicides: Analyzing Popham v. City of Talladega

Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Suicides: Analyzing Popham v. City of Talladega

Date: Aug 21, 1990
Deliberate Indifference in Prisoner Suicides: Analyzing Popham v. City of Talladega Introduction The case of Popham v. City of Talladega addresses critical issues surrounding the constitutional...
Fair Opportunity in Employment: The Precedent Set by Burns v. Gadsden State Community College

Fair Opportunity in Employment: The Precedent Set by Burns v. Gadsden State Community College

Date: Aug 16, 1990
Fair Opportunity in Employment: The Precedent Set by Burns v. Gadsden State Community College Introduction The case of Gladys King Burns v. Gadsden State Community College, decided by the United...
Reaffirming First Amendment Protections in Public Employment: Insights from Stewart v. Baldwin County Board of Education

Reaffirming First Amendment Protections in Public Employment: Insights from Stewart v. Baldwin County Board of Education

Date: Aug 16, 1990
Reaffirming First Amendment Protections in Public Employment: Insights from Stewart v. Baldwin County Board of Education Introduction The case of James D. Stewart v. Baldwin County Board of Education...
Mandating Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in ERISA Plans: Analysis of Springer v. Wal-Mart

Mandating Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in ERISA Plans: Analysis of Springer v. Wal-Mart

Date: Aug 11, 1990
Mandating Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in ERISA Plans: Analysis of Springer v. Wal-Mart Introduction Ethelene Springer v. Wal-Mart Associates' Group Health Plan, 908 F.2d 897 (11th Cir....
Reaffirmation of Lodestar Approach in Determining Bankruptcy Attorney’s Fees: Grant v. Schumann Tire Battery Co.

Reaffirmation of Lodestar Approach in Determining Bankruptcy Attorney’s Fees: Grant v. Schumann Tire Battery Co.

Date: Aug 11, 1990
Reaffirmation of Lodestar Approach in Determining Bankruptcy Attorney’s Fees: Grant v. Schumann Tire Battery Co. Introduction Grant v. Schumann Tire Battery Co., 908 F.2d 874 (11th Cir. 1990), is a...
University of Alabama at Birmingham v. United States: Affirming Non-Discriminatory Provision of Auxiliary Aids

University of Alabama at Birmingham v. United States: Affirming Non-Discriminatory Provision of Auxiliary Aids

Date: Aug 9, 1990
Affirming Non-Discriminatory Provision of Auxiliary Aids: University of Alabama at Birmingham v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. The Board of Trustees...
Ripeness in Zoning Disputes: Insights from EIDE v. SARASOTA COUNTY

Ripeness in Zoning Disputes: Insights from EIDE v. SARASOTA COUNTY

Date: Aug 9, 1990
Ripeness in Zoning Disputes: Insights from EIDE v. SARASOTA COUNTY Introduction The case of Elling O. EIDE v. SARASOTA COUNTY, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Application of the D'Oench Doctrine in Successor Liability: Vernon v. Resolution Trust Corporation

Application of the D'Oench Doctrine in Successor Liability: Vernon v. Resolution Trust Corporation

Date: Aug 4, 1990
Application of the D'Oench Doctrine in Successor Liability: Vernon v. Resolution Trust Corporation Introduction Vernon v. Resolution Trust Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Vernon Earley and Garey Noe v. Champion International Corp.

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Vernon Earley and Garey Noe v. Champion International Corp.

Date: Aug 3, 1990
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Vernon Earley and Garey Noe v. Champion International Corp. Introduction The case of Vernon Earley and Garey Noe v. Champion International...
Enhanced Compliance with Rule 12.2(a) for Insanity Defense: Insights from United States v. Cameron

Enhanced Compliance with Rule 12.2(a) for Insanity Defense: Insights from United States v. Cameron

Date: Aug 2, 1990
Enhanced Compliance with Rule 12.2(a) for Insanity Defense: Insights from United States v. Cameron Introduction The case of United States of America v. Karen Cameron, adjudicated by the United States...
Enforcement of Forum-Closing Statutes in Assembly Contracts: SH Contractors v. Taft Coal Company

Enforcement of Forum-Closing Statutes in Assembly Contracts: SH Contractors v. Taft Coal Company

Date: Jul 31, 1990
Enforcement of Forum-Closing Statutes in Assembly Contracts: SH Contractors v. Taft Coal Company Introduction The case of SH Contractors, Inc. v. A.J. Taft Coal Company, Inc. addresses the...
ERISA Compliance and Fiduciary Duties: Alday v. Container Corp. of America

ERISA Compliance and Fiduciary Duties: Alday v. Container Corp. of America

Date: Jul 25, 1990
ERISA Compliance and Fiduciary Duties: Alday v. Container Corp. of America Introduction In Alday v. Container Corp. of America, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Civil Rights Action: Brown v. Crawford

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Civil Rights Action: Brown v. Crawford

Date: Jul 25, 1990
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Civil Rights Action: Brown v. Crawford Introduction The case of Columbus Brown v. Fred Crawford, decided on July 24, 1990, by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of New Trial Grant for Prejudicial Closing Arguments in First Amendment Retaliation Suit Under 42 U.S.C. §1983

Affirmation of New Trial Grant for Prejudicial Closing Arguments in First Amendment Retaliation Suit Under 42 U.S.C. §1983

Date: Jul 25, 1990
Affirmation of New Trial Grant for Prejudicial Closing Arguments in First Amendment Retaliation Suit Under 42 U.S.C. §1983 Introduction The case of Hank R. McWhorter v. City of Birmingham addresses...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert