Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enforcement of Disgorgement Orders through Civil Contempt: Insights from CFTC v. Wellington Precious Metals, Inc.

Enforcement of Disgorgement Orders through Civil Contempt: Insights from CFTC v. Wellington Precious Metals, Inc.

Date: Jan 15, 1992
Enforcement of Disgorgement Orders through Civil Contempt: Insights from CFTC v. Wellington Precious Metals, Inc. Introduction The case of Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the State of...
Scope of Consensual Searches: Authority to Open Locked Containers Established in United States v. Martinez

Scope of Consensual Searches: Authority to Open Locked Containers Established in United States v. Martinez

Date: Jan 8, 1992
Scope of Consensual Searches: Authority to Open Locked Containers Established in United States v. Martinez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Elsie Martinez (949 F.2d 1117)...
Limitation of § 1983 Claims Against Private Actors in Involuntary Mental Health Commitments: Harvey v. Harvey

Limitation of § 1983 Claims Against Private Actors in Involuntary Mental Health Commitments: Harvey v. Harvey

Date: Jan 8, 1992
Limitation of § 1983 Claims Against Private Actors in Involuntary Mental Health Commitments: Harvey v. Harvey Introduction A Comprehensive Analysis of the Eleventh Circuit's Affirmation in Harvey v....
Establishing the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Vouching: United States v. Eyster and Marshall

Establishing the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Vouching: United States v. Eyster and Marshall

Date: Dec 18, 1991
Establishing the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Vouching: United States v. Eyster and Marshall Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert Irving Eyster and Jack Leroy Marshall (948 F.2d...
Defining Fiduciary Status under ERISA: Affirmation in Useden v. Acker

Defining Fiduciary Status under ERISA: Affirmation in Useden v. Acker

Date: Dec 12, 1991
Defining Fiduciary Status under ERISA: Affirmation in Useden v. Acker Introduction The case of Neil A. Useden, as Trustee of the Air Florida System, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan Trust v. C. Edward...
Admissibility of Exculpatory Testimony and Importation Charges in Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Costa et al.

Admissibility of Exculpatory Testimony and Importation Charges in Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Costa et al.

Date: Nov 26, 1991
Admissibility of Exculpatory Testimony and Importation Charges in Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Costa et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Manuel Costa, Debra Maxine...
Common Fund Fee Awards Should Be Calculated as a Percentage of the Fund

Common Fund Fee Awards Should Be Calculated as a Percentage of the Fund

Date: Nov 5, 1991
Common Fund Fee Awards Should Be Calculated as a Percentage of the Fund Introduction In the landmark case Camden I Condominium Association, Inc. et al. v. Dunkle and Palm Beach County, decided by the...
Reinforcing Racial Discrimination in Peremptory Challenges: Horton v. Zant

Reinforcing Racial Discrimination in Peremptory Challenges: Horton v. Zant

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Reinforcing Racial Discrimination in Peremptory Challenges: Horton v. Zant Introduction Horton v. Zant, 941 F.2d 1449 (11th Cir. 1991), is a seminal case addressing the use of peremptory challenges...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Heath v. Jones: Clarifying Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jurisdiction in Capital Cases

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Heath v. Jones: Clarifying Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jurisdiction in Capital Cases

Date: Oct 26, 1991
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Heath v. Jones: Clarifying Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jurisdiction in Capital Cases Introduction Heath v. Jones, 941 F.2d 1126 (11th Cir. 1991), addresses...
Limits of Deliberate Ignorance Instructions in Establishing Criminal Mens Rea: US v. Rivera and Vila

Limits of Deliberate Ignorance Instructions in Establishing Criminal Mens Rea: US v. Rivera and Vila

Date: Oct 23, 1991
Limits of Deliberate Ignorance Instructions in Establishing Criminal Mens Rea: United States v. Rivera and Vila Introduction The case of United States of America v. Johnny Rivera and Elena Vila (944...
Williams v. Burton: Upholding the Use of Four-Point Restraints under the Eighth Amendment

Williams v. Burton: Upholding the Use of Four-Point Restraints under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Oct 19, 1991
Williams v. Burton: Upholding the Use of Four-Point Restraints under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Case Citation: Michael D. Williams v. Larry W. Burton et al., 943 F.2d 1572 (11th Cir. 1991)...
Enforcing Judicial Orders: Personal Liability and Sanctions in Civil Contempt - Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Chamberlain

Enforcing Judicial Orders: Personal Liability and Sanctions in Civil Contempt - Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Chamberlain

Date: Oct 5, 1991
Enforcing Judicial Orders: Personal Liability and Sanctions in Civil Contempt Introduction The case of Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc., et al. v. James D. Watkins, et al. adjudicated by the United...
Establishing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Sentencing: Blanco v. Singletary

Establishing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Sentencing: Blanco v. Singletary

Date: Oct 1, 1991
Establishing Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Sentencing: Blanco v. Singletary Introduction Blanco v. Singletary is a pivotal case from the United States Court of...
Dybach v. State of Florida Department of Corrections: Clarifying Professional Exemption Under the FLSA

Dybach v. State of Florida Department of Corrections: Clarifying Professional Exemption Under the FLSA

Date: Oct 1, 1991
Dybach v. State of Florida Department of Corrections: Clarifying Professional Exemption Under the FLSA Introduction In the landmark case of Dybach v. State of Florida Department of Corrections, the...
Tejada v. Dugger: Procedural Defaults and the Materiality of False Testimony in Habeas Corpus Relief

Tejada v. Dugger: Procedural Defaults and the Materiality of False Testimony in Habeas Corpus Relief

Date: Sep 21, 1991
Tejada v. Dugger: Procedural Defaults and the Materiality of False Testimony in Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction Hugo Tejada v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Rights in Correctional Medical Care: Harris v. Thigpen

Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Rights in Correctional Medical Care: Harris v. Thigpen

Date: Sep 19, 1991
Affirmation of Eighth Amendment Rights in Correctional Medical Care: Harris v. Thigpen Introduction In Carmen Jean Harris and Leslie John Pettway v. Morris Thigpen et al., the United States Court of...
Strict Modalities of Rule 35(b) and Section 4205(g) Affirmed in Fernandez v. United States

Strict Modalities of Rule 35(b) and Section 4205(g) Affirmed in Fernandez v. United States

Date: Sep 19, 1991
Strict Modalities of Rule 35(b) and Section 4205(g) Affirmed in Fernandez v. United States Introduction Fernando Fernandez v. United States of America (941 F.2d 1488, 11th Cir. 1991) is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in Jones v. Department of Health and Human Services

Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in Jones v. Department of Health and Human Services

Date: Sep 19, 1991
Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in Jones v. Department of Health and Human Services Introduction Lawrence Jones, the plaintiff-appellant, initiated legal proceedings against the...
OP HOLLIS v. DAVIS: Affirming Habeas Corpus Rights Amid Systematic Racial Exclusion of Juries

OP HOLLIS v. DAVIS: Affirming Habeas Corpus Rights Amid Systematic Racial Exclusion of Juries

Date: Sep 19, 1991
OP HOLLIS v. DAVIS: Affirming Habeas Corpus Rights Amid Systematic Racial Exclusion of Juries Introduction OP HOLLIS v. DAVIS and the Attorney General of Alabama is a significant case decided by the...
Liability of County Sheriffs for Policy Failures under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Rivas v. Freeman

Liability of County Sheriffs for Policy Failures under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Rivas v. Freeman

Date: Sep 10, 1991
Liability of County Sheriffs for Policy Failures under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Rivas v. Freeman Introduction The case of Alfredo Rivas v. William A. Freeman, Jr., et al. adjudicated by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert