Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Inflation Considerations in EAJA Attorney Fee Awards: Meyer v. Sullivan

Inflation Considerations in EAJA Attorney Fee Awards: Meyer v. Sullivan

Date: Apr 9, 1992
Inflation Considerations in EAJA Attorney Fee Awards: Meyer v. Sullivan Introduction Meyer v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 1029 (11th Cir. 1992), consolidates several appeals challenging the application of...
Requiring Vocational Expert Testimony and Proper Consideration of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Appeals: Marbury v. Sullivan

Requiring Vocational Expert Testimony and Proper Consideration of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Appeals: Marbury v. Sullivan

Date: Apr 9, 1992
Requiring Vocational Expert Testimony and Proper Consideration of Medical Evidence in Social Security Disability Appeals: Marbury v. Sullivan Introduction The case of Tommy J. Marbury v. Louis W....
Establishing Procedural Due Process Requirements in Public Employment Suspensions: Bailey v. Alachua County Commissioners

Establishing Procedural Due Process Requirements in Public Employment Suspensions: Bailey v. Alachua County Commissioners

Date: Apr 1, 1992
Establishing Procedural Due Process Requirements in Public Employment Suspensions: Bailey v. Alachua County Commissioners Introduction In Bailey v. Board of County Commissioners of Alachua County,...
Retroactive Application of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Actions Post-Beam Decision

Retroactive Application of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Actions Post-Beam Decision

Date: Apr 1, 1992
Retroactive Application of Statute of Limitations in Section 1983 Actions Post-Beam Decision Introduction The case of Lance Lufkin v. Charles A. McCallum et al. presents a pivotal moment in the...
Legislative Immunity Affirmed for County Commissioners in Yeldell v. Cooper Green Hospital

Legislative Immunity Affirmed for County Commissioners in Yeldell v. Cooper Green Hospital

Date: Mar 31, 1992
Legislative Immunity Affirmed for County Commissioners in Yeldell v. Cooper Green Hospital Introduction The case of Sharon Yeldell et al. v. Cooper Green Hospital, Inc. addresses pivotal issues...
Mootness in Bankruptcy Appeals: The "In Re Club Associates" Standard

Mootness in Bankruptcy Appeals: The "In Re Club Associates" Standard

Date: Mar 31, 1992
Mootness in Bankruptcy Appeals: The "In Re Club Associates" Standard Introduction The appellate case In Re Club Associates, Debtor involves a dispute between First Union Real Estate Equity and...
United States v. Lehder-Rivas: Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in Continuing Criminal Enterprise Cases

United States v. Lehder-Rivas: Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in Continuing Criminal Enterprise Cases

Date: Mar 26, 1992
United States v. Lehder-Rivas: Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in Continuing Criminal Enterprise Cases Introduction United States of America v. Carlos Enrique Lehder-Rivas and Jack Carlton Reed...
Abstention Doctrine in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: Reversing Automatic Stay Violations in Family Law Context

Abstention Doctrine in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: Reversing Automatic Stay Violations in Family Law Context

Date: Mar 7, 1992
Abstention Doctrine in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: Reversing Automatic Stay Violations in Family Law Context Introduction The case of Edward Carver v. Paulette Carver et al. involves intricate...
Reaffirming Arbitration Finality: PaineWebber v. Robbins Trustees

Reaffirming Arbitration Finality: PaineWebber v. Robbins Trustees

Date: Feb 28, 1992
Reaffirming Arbitration Finality: PaineWebber v. Robbins Trustees Introduction The case of Irene Robbins and Bert Shepherd, acting as trustees of the Davis Robbins Family Trust and Davis Robbins...
SEC v. Elliott: Reinforcing Due Process and Security Interests in Mass Receivership Cases

SEC v. Elliott: Reinforcing Due Process and Security Interests in Mass Receivership Cases

Date: Feb 28, 1992
SEC v. Elliott: Reinforcing Due Process and Security Interests in Mass Receivership Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. Charles Phillip Elliott, et...
Affirming the Fundamental Right to Self-Testimony: United States v. Teague

Affirming the Fundamental Right to Self-Testimony: United States v. Teague

Date: Feb 27, 1992
Affirming the Fundamental Right to Self-Testimony: United States v. Donald Teague Introduction The case of United States of America v. Donald Teague, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Res Judicata and Subsequent Claims in Employment Discrimination: Manning v. City of Auburn

Res Judicata and Subsequent Claims in Employment Discrimination: Manning v. City of Auburn

Date: Feb 20, 1992
Res Judicata and Subsequent Claims in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Manning v. City of Auburn Introduction Manning v. City of Auburn is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States...
Enhancing Due Process: Brady Obligations and Miranda Rights in Jacobs v. Singletary et al.

Enhancing Due Process: Brady Obligations and Miranda Rights in Jacobs v. Singletary et al.

Date: Feb 7, 1992
Enhancing Due Process: Brady Obligations and Miranda Rights in Jacobs v. Singletary et al. Introduction Jacobs v. Singletary et al., 952 F.2d 1282 (11th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case that underscores...
Procedural Default and Cause Prejudice in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of McCoy v. Newsome (1992)

Procedural Default and Cause Prejudice in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of McCoy v. Newsome (1992)

Date: Jan 30, 1992
Procedural Default and Cause Prejudice in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of McCoy v. Newsome (1992) Introduction In McCoy v. Newsome (953 F.2d 1252, 11th Cir. 1992), Henry Lee McCoy challenged his...
Welch v. Celotex: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Accrual of Action in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases

Welch v. Celotex: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Accrual of Action in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases

Date: Jan 29, 1992
Welch v. Celotex: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Accrual of Action in Asbestos Personal Injury Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Dallas Welch v. Celotex Corporation, et al., decided by the...
Hypothecation Not a Sale: Affirmation of Right of First Refusal in Real Estate Financing

Hypothecation Not a Sale: Affirmation of Right of First Refusal in Real Estate Financing

Date: Jan 29, 1992
Hypothecation Not a Sale: Affirmation of Right of First Refusal in Real Estate Financing Introduction The case of In Re Club Associates, Debtor addresses a pivotal issue in the realm of commercial...
Ensuring Sixth Amendment Protections: The Stokes Decision on Waiver of Counsel and Confession Voluntariness

Ensuring Sixth Amendment Protections: The Stokes Decision on Waiver of Counsel and Confession Voluntariness

Date: Jan 28, 1992
Ensuring Sixth Amendment Protections: The Stokes Decision on Waiver of Counsel and Confession Voluntariness Introduction The case of Durham Eldon Stokes v. Harry K. Singletary, Jr., Florida...
Ensuring Adequate Discovery for Pro Se Litigants in §1983 Claims: Dean v. Barber Analysis

Ensuring Adequate Discovery for Pro Se Litigants in §1983 Claims: Dean v. Barber Analysis

Date: Jan 28, 1992
Ensuring Adequate Discovery for Pro Se Litigants in §1983 Claims: Dean v. Barber Analysis Introduction John D. Dean, a defendant-appellant, initiated a civil lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against...
Doe v. Frank: Reinforcing the Presumption of Openness in Judicial Proceedings

Doe v. Frank: Reinforcing the Presumption of Openness in Judicial Proceedings

Date: Jan 25, 1992
Doe v. Frank: Reinforcing the Presumption of Openness in Judicial Proceedings Introduction Doe v. Frank, 951 F.2d 320 (11th Cir. 1992), presents a pivotal examination of the balance between a...
Retention of Adversary Proceeding Jurisdiction Post-Bankruptcy Dismissal: In Re John W. Morris

Retention of Adversary Proceeding Jurisdiction Post-Bankruptcy Dismissal: In Re John W. Morris

Date: Jan 16, 1992
Retention of Adversary Proceeding Jurisdiction Post-Bankruptcy Dismissal: In Re John W. Morris Introduction The case of In Re John W. Morris, d/b/a John Morris Building Systems, Debtor (950 F.2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert