Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Coulter v. Alabama Department of Corrections: Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Corpus Relief

Coulter v. Alabama Department of Corrections: Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Corpus Relief

Date: Jul 25, 1995
Coulter v. Alabama Department of Corrections: Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction David L. Coulter appealed his capital murder conviction and death sentence in Da v. d L....
Voluntary Resignation Determination in Hargray v. City of Hallandale: A Comprehensive Analysis

Voluntary Resignation Determination in Hargray v. City of Hallandale: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jul 20, 1995
Voluntary Resignation Determination in Hargray v. City of Hallandale: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Vernon E. Hargray v. City of Hallandale, 57 F.3d 1560 (11th Cir. 1995),...
Clarifying Miranda Rights and Competency Standards: Insights from Medina v. Singletary

Clarifying Miranda Rights and Competency Standards: Insights from Medina v. Singletary

Date: Jul 18, 1995
Clarifying Miranda Rights and Competency Standards: Insights from Medina v. Singletary Introduction Pedro Medina v. Harry K. Singletary et al. is a significant case adjudicated by the United States...
Liability of County Commissions Under §1983 for Salary Discrimination: An Analysis of Welch v. Da

Liability of County Commissions Under §1983 for Salary Discrimination: An Analysis of Welch v. Da

Date: Jul 8, 1995
Liability of County Commissions Under §1983 for Salary Discrimination: An Analysis of Welch v. Da Introduction In the case of Tobbie L. Welch v. Da, 57 F.3d 1004 (11th Cir. 1995), the United States...
Clarifying the Admissibility of 404(b) Evidence and Jencks Act Protections in United States v. Delgado et al.

Clarifying the Admissibility of 404(b) Evidence and Jencks Act Protections in United States v. Delgado et al.

Date: Jul 6, 1995
Clarifying the Admissibility of 404(b) Evidence and Jencks Act Protections in United States v. Delgado et al. Introduction In the landmark decision of United States v. Delgado, Albelo, Riverol, and...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms RICO Convictions, Reinforcing Operation or Management Test

Eleventh Circuit Affirms RICO Convictions, Reinforcing Operation or Management Test

Date: Jun 28, 1995
Eleventh Circuit Affirms RICO Convictions, Reinforcing Operation or Management Test Introduction The case of United States of America v. James Walter Starrett et al. (55 F.3d 1525, 11th Cir. 1995)...
Affirmation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act Under the Commerce Clause

Affirmation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act Under the Commerce Clause

Date: Jun 24, 1995
Affirmation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act Under the Commerce Clause Introduction In the landmark case of Myrna Cheffer and Judy Madsen v. Janet Reno, the United States Court of...
Rule 25(c) Governs Substitution of Parties in Disclaimers: Analysis of Barker v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.

Rule 25(c) Governs Substitution of Parties in Disclaimers: Analysis of Barker v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 16, 1995
Rule 25(c) Governs Substitution of Parties in Disclaimers: Analysis of Barker v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Richard Barker, Jr. v. Jackson National Life Insurance...
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Violations: Hartsfield v. Lemacks

Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Violations: Hartsfield v. Lemacks

Date: Jun 15, 1995
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Violations: Hartsfield v. Lemacks Introduction The case of Leonard Hartsfield, Sr., Mattie Hartsfield v. D.G. Lemacks et al. is a landmark decision by the...
Eleventh Circuit Decision in Walker v. NationsBank: Clarifying the Admissibility of EEOC Determination Letters and Standards for Awarding Attorney's Fees in Employment Discrimination Litigation

Eleventh Circuit Decision in Walker v. NationsBank: Clarifying the Admissibility of EEOC Determination Letters and Standards for Awarding Attorney's Fees in Employment Discrimination Litigation

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Eleventh Circuit Decision in Walker v. NationsBank: Clarifying the Admissibility of EEOC Determination Letters and Standards for Awarding Attorney's Fees in Employment Discrimination Litigation...
Right to a Jury Trial in Civil Rights Litigation: BURNS v. LAWTHER et al. Analysis

Right to a Jury Trial in Civil Rights Litigation: BURNS v. LAWTHER et al. Analysis

Date: Jun 8, 1995
Right to a Jury Trial in Civil Rights Litigation: BURNS v. LAWTHER et al. Analysis Introduction BURNS v. LAWTHER ET AL. is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Understanding the Willfulness Requirement in Financial Structuring: Vazquez v. United States

Understanding the Willfulness Requirement in Financial Structuring: Vazquez v. United States

Date: Jun 8, 1995
Understanding the Willfulness Requirement in Financial Structuring: Vazquez v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Ramon J. Vazquez, 53 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal...
Imposter Defense Validates Insurance Rescission Despite Incontestability Clause: Fioretti v. MassGen

Imposter Defense Validates Insurance Rescission Despite Incontestability Clause: Fioretti v. MassGen

Date: Jun 8, 1995
Imposter Defense Validates Insurance Rescission Despite Incontestability Clause: Fioretti v. Massachusetts General Life Insurance Company Introduction Fioretti v. Massachusetts General Life Insurance...
Enforcing Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Kight v. Singletary

Enforcing Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Kight v. Singletary

Date: Jun 7, 1995
Enforcing Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Kight v. Singletary Introduction Charles Michael Kight, the petitioner-appellant, challenged his conviction and death sentence in...
Clarifying the Learned Intermediary Defense: Insights from Christopher v. Armour Pharmaceutical

Clarifying the Learned Intermediary Defense: Insights from Christopher v. Armour Pharmaceutical

Date: Jun 3, 1995
Clarifying the Learned Intermediary Defense: Insights from Christopher v. Armour Pharmaceutical Introduction In the landmark case of Christopher v. Armour Pharmaceutical, decided by the United States...
Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. JDC America Corp.: Defining the Scope of Title Insurance Coverage in Foreclosure Actions

Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. JDC America Corp.: Defining the Scope of Title Insurance Coverage in Foreclosure Actions

Date: Jun 1, 1995
Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. JDC America Corp.: Defining the Scope of Title Insurance Coverage in Foreclosure Actions Introduction The case Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. JDC (America) Corp....
Expansion of Retaliation Protections: Application of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(a)(1) to Federal Civil Proceedings

Expansion of Retaliation Protections: Application of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(a)(1) to Federal Civil Proceedings

Date: May 27, 1995
Expansion of Retaliation Protections: Application of 18 U.S.C. § 1513(a)(1) to Federal Civil Proceedings Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jackie McLeod, 53 F.3d 322 (11th Cir....
Equal Protection Upheld in Zoning Ordinance Ban on Houseboats in Miami

Equal Protection Upheld in Zoning Ordinance Ban on Houseboats in Miami

Date: May 20, 1995
Equal Protection Upheld in Zoning Ordinance Ban on Houseboats in Miami Introduction The case of Stanley Haves and Marjorie Haves v. City of Miami addresses the legality of municipal zoning ordinances...
Affirmation of Money Laundering Conviction in U.S. v. Mullis Establishes Standards for Defendant Testimony

Affirmation of Money Laundering Conviction in U.S. v. Mullis Establishes Standards for Defendant Testimony

Date: May 16, 1995
Affirmation of Money Laundering Conviction in U.S. v. Mullis Establishes Standards for Defendant Testimony Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Floyd Brown, James Woodrow...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Qualified Immunity and Clarifies Minor Consent in Fourth Amendment Claims in Lenz v. Winburn

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Qualified Immunity and Clarifies Minor Consent in Fourth Amendment Claims in Lenz v. Winburn

Date: May 13, 1995
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Qualified Immunity and Clarifies Minor Consent in Fourth Amendment Claims in Lenz v. Winburn Introduction The case of Donald Lenz and Shirley Lenz v. Mary Winburn et al. was...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert