Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reexamination of Sanctions Under Bankruptcy Rule 9011: Insights from In re Da v. d G. MROZ

Reexamination of Sanctions Under Bankruptcy Rule 9011: Insights from In re Da v. d G. MROZ

Date: Oct 11, 1995
Reexamination of Sanctions Under Bankruptcy Rule 9011: Insights from In re Da v. d G. MROZ Introduction The appellate decision in In re Da v. d G. MROZ, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Retaliation and Racial Discrimination in Correctional Facilities: The Harris v. Ostrou Case

Retaliation and Racial Discrimination in Correctional Facilities: The Harris v. Ostrou Case

Date: Sep 30, 1995
Retaliation and Racial Discrimination in Correctional Facilities: The Harris v. Ostrout Case Introduction Vincent D. Harris v. I.K. Ostrout, et al., 65 F.3d 912 (11th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case...
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Protections in Williamson v. Mills

Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Protections in Williamson v. Mills

Date: Sep 28, 1995
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Protections in Williamson v. Mills Introduction The case of Gerald Williamson v. F.H. Mills revolves around allegations of constitutional rights violations...
Clarification of FLSA Exemption for Amusement Establishments: Sarasota White Sox, Inc. v. Jeffery (1995)

Clarification of FLSA Exemption for Amusement Establishments: Sarasota White Sox, Inc. v. Jeffery (1995)

Date: Sep 16, 1995
Clarification of FLSA Exemption for Amusement Establishments: Sarasota White Sox, Inc. v. Jeffery (1995) Introduction The case of Ronald R. Jeffery v. Sarasota White Sox, Inc., decided by the United...
Ripeness and Exhaustion of Remedies in Bivens Actions: An Analysis of Abella v. Rubino et al.

Ripeness and Exhaustion of Remedies in Bivens Actions: An Analysis of Abella v. Rubino et al.

Date: Sep 13, 1995
Ripeness and Exhaustion of Remedies in Bivens Actions: An Analysis of Abella v. Rubino et al. Introduction Jose Abella v. Rubino et al., 63 F.3d 1063 (11th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case addressing...
Enforcement of Direct Action Statutes and Arbitration Waiver in Admiralty Jurisdiction: Insights from Morewitz v. West of England

Enforcement of Direct Action Statutes and Arbitration Waiver in Admiralty Jurisdiction: Insights from Morewitz v. West of England

Date: Sep 7, 1995
Enforcement of Direct Action Statutes and Arbitration Waiver in Admiralty Jurisdiction: Insights from Morewitz v. West of England Introduction MOREWITZ v. WEST OF ENGLAND SHIP OWNERS MUTual...
Collateral Estoppel in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: In re Freddie Maxton BUSH

Collateral Estoppel in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: In re Freddie Maxton BUSH

Date: Sep 1, 1995
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for legal matters. Collateral Estoppel in Bankruptcy...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Boundaries of Deliberate Indifference under the Eighth Amendment

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Boundaries of Deliberate Indifference under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Aug 29, 1995
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Boundaries of Deliberate Indifference under the Eighth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of Jack R. Adams, as Parent and Next of Kin of Michael Adams, Deceased...
Jurisdictional Boundaries and Voluntary Consent in Warrantless Searches: Analysis of Tovar-Rico v. United States

Jurisdictional Boundaries and Voluntary Consent in Warrantless Searches: Analysis of Tovar-Rico v. United States

Date: Aug 29, 1995
Jurisdictional Boundaries and Voluntary Consent in Warrantless Searches: Analysis of Tovar-Rico v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Clara Inez Tovar-Rico,...
Establishing Prevailing Party for Costs and Attorneys' Fees: Insights from Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Larry Medford

Establishing Prevailing Party for Costs and Attorneys' Fees: Insights from Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Larry Medford

Date: Aug 26, 1995
Establishing Prevailing Party for Costs and Attorneys' Fees: Insights from Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Larry Medford Introduction Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Larry Medford, et...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in MILLS v. SINGLETARY: Upholding Procedural Barriers and Addressing Constitutional Claims

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in MILLS v. SINGLETARY: Upholding Procedural Barriers and Addressing Constitutional Claims

Date: Aug 16, 1995
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in MILLS v. SINGLETARY: Upholding Procedural Barriers and Addressing Constitutional Claims Introduction The case of John Mills, Jr. v. Harry K. Singletary, decided...
Affirmation of Effective Counsel and Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus: MAREK v. SINGLETARY

Affirmation of Effective Counsel and Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus: MAREK v. SINGLETARY

Date: Aug 15, 1995
Affirmation of Effective Counsel and Procedural Defaults in Federal Habeas Corpus: MAREK v. SINGLETARY Introduction John Richard Marek v. Harry K. Singletary, 62 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 1995), presents...
Eleventh Circuit Reverses IRS Liability Under I.R.C. § 6672, Affirming Taxpayer's Right to Recover Costs under I.R.C. § 7430

Eleventh Circuit Reverses IRS Liability Under I.R.C. § 6672, Affirming Taxpayer's Right to Recover Costs under I.R.C. § 7430

Date: Aug 12, 1995
Eleventh Circuit Reverses IRS Liability Under I.R.C. § 6672, Affirming Taxpayer's Right to Recover Costs under I.R.C. § 7430 Introduction The case of Terrell Cooper v. United States of America (60...
Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity in Equal Protection Claims: Ratliff v. DeKalb County

Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity in Equal Protection Claims: Ratliff v. DeKalb County

Date: Aug 10, 1995
Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity in Equal Protection Claims: Ratliff v. DeKalb County Introduction Ratliff v. DeKalb County, 62 F.3d 338 (11th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case that examines the...
Official Detention Defined: Influence on Sentencing Credit under 18 U.S.C. §3585(b)

Official Detention Defined: Influence on Sentencing Credit under 18 U.S.C. §3585(b)

Date: Aug 5, 1995
Official Detention Defined: Influence on Sentencing Credit under 18 U.S.C. §3585(b) Introduction In the case of Rodriguez v. Lamer, adjudicated on August 4, 1995, the United States Court of Appeals...
Timeliness of EEOC Filings in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Insights from Hargett v. Valley Federal Savings Bank

Timeliness of EEOC Filings in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Insights from Hargett v. Valley Federal Savings Bank

Date: Aug 5, 1995
Timeliness of EEOC Filings in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Insights from Hargett v. Valley Federal Savings Bank Introduction Hargett v. Valley Federal Savings Bank is a pivotal case...
Enforcement of Punitive Damages in Arbitration: Davis v. Prudential Securities

Enforcement of Punitive Damages in Arbitration: Davis v. Prudential Securities

Date: Aug 1, 1995
Enforcement of Punitive Damages in Arbitration: Davis v. Prudential Securities Introduction Davis v. Prudential Securities, Inc., 59 F.3d 1186 (11th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case that examines the...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Municipal Liability for Inadequate Inmate Mental Health Care under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Augusta v. Young

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Municipal Liability for Inadequate Inmate Mental Health Care under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Augusta v. Young

Date: Jul 29, 1995
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Municipal Liability for Inadequate Inmate Mental Health Care under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Augusta v. Young Introduction In the landmark case of Pamela D. Young v. City of...
Piper Test Establishes Preconfirmation Relationship Requirement for §101(5) Claims in Bankruptcy

Piper Test Establishes Preconfirmation Relationship Requirement for §101(5) Claims in Bankruptcy

Date: Jul 27, 1995
Piper Test Establishes Preconfirmation Relationship Requirement for §101(5) Claims in Bankruptcy Introduction The case of Da v. d G. Epstein set a significant precedent in bankruptcy law,...
Beckwith v. City of Daytona Beach Shores: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Retaliatory Employment Terminations

Beckwith v. City of Daytona Beach Shores: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Retaliatory Employment Terminations

Date: Jul 26, 1995
Beckwith v. City of Daytona Beach Shores: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Retaliatory Employment Terminations Introduction Beckwith v. City of Daytona Beach Shores, Florida is a landmark...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert