Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enforcement of Safety Valve Provisions in Federal Sentencing: Affirmation in United States v. Cruz

Enforcement of Safety Valve Provisions in Federal Sentencing: Affirmation in United States v. Cruz

Date: Mar 7, 1997
Enforcement of Safety Valve Provisions in Federal Sentencing: Affirmation in United States v. Cruz Introduction The case of United States of America v. Juan Diego Cruz, decided by the United States...
Restitution Abatement upon Defendant's Death: Insights from United States v. Logal et al.

Restitution Abatement upon Defendant's Death: Insights from United States v. Logal et al.

Date: Mar 7, 1997
Restitution Abatement upon Defendant's Death: Insights from United States v. Logal et al. Introduction United States of America v. Nelson Logal, Aarid Dahod, a.k.a. Aarid Mansur Dahodwala, John...
Eleventh Circuit Confirms State-Registered Trademark Supremacy and Restricts Attorneys' Fees under Georgia FBPA

Eleventh Circuit Confirms State-Registered Trademark Supremacy and Restricts Attorneys' Fees under Georgia FBPA

Date: Feb 25, 1997
Eleventh Circuit Confirms State-Registered Trademark Supremacy and Restricts Attorneys' Fees under Georgia FBPA Introduction The case of Lone Star Steakhouse Saloon, Inc. v. Longhorn Steaks, Inc....
Establishing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Title VII Race Discrimination: Insights from Combs v. Meadowcraft Inc.

Establishing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Title VII Race Discrimination: Insights from Combs v. Meadowcraft Inc.

Date: Feb 21, 1997
Establishing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Title VII Race Discrimination: Insights from Combs v. Meadowcraft Inc. Introduction The case of Darrell Combs v. Plantation Patterns, Meadowcraft Company,...
Limits of First Amendment Protections in §1983 Retaliation Claims: Watkins v. Bowden, Jr.

Limits of First Amendment Protections in §1983 Retaliation Claims: Watkins v. Bowden, Jr.

Date: Feb 19, 1997
Limits of First Amendment Protections in §1983 Retaliation Claims: Watkins v. Bowden, Jr. Introduction Watkins v. Bowden, Jr. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reinforcement of Rule 11 and In Forma Pauperis Standards in Preventing Abusive Litigation: Attwood v. Singletary

Reinforcement of Rule 11 and In Forma Pauperis Standards in Preventing Abusive Litigation: Attwood v. Singletary

Date: Feb 12, 1997
Reinforcement of Rule 11 and In Forma Pauperis Standards in Preventing Abusive Litigation: Attwood v. Singletary Introduction Robert Attwood v. Harry Singletary et al. is a notable case adjudicated...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Employer Status as a Core Element in ADEA Claims

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Employer Status as a Core Element in ADEA Claims

Date: Feb 4, 1997
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Employer Status as a Core Element in ADEA Claims Introduction In the case of Luis E. Garcia, M.D. v. Copenhaver, Bell Associates, M.D.'s, P.A., St. Paul Fire Marine...
Clarifying 'Color of State Law' in Qualified Immunity: Almand v. DeKalb County Decision

Clarifying 'Color of State Law' in Qualified Immunity: Almand v. DeKalb County Decision

Date: Jan 25, 1997
Clarifying 'Color of State Law' in Qualified Immunity: Almand v. DeKalb County Decision Introduction The case of Mary Elizabeth Almand and Joann Warren v. DeKalb County, Georgia presents a pivotal...
Limits of Protected Opposition: Carrier Corp. v. Little and the Scope of Title VII's Retaliation Protections

Limits of Protected Opposition: Carrier Corp. v. Little and the Scope of Title VII's Retaliation Protections

Date: Jan 23, 1997
Limits of Protected Opposition: Carrier Corp. v. Little and the Scope of Title VII's Retaliation Protections Introduction The case of Bryan Little v. United Technologies, Carrier Transicold Division,...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Academic Retaliation: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Williams v. Alabama State University

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Academic Retaliation: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Williams v. Alabama State University

Date: Jan 7, 1997
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Academic Retaliation: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Williams v. Alabama State University Introduction In the landmark case of Patrice D. Williams v. Alabama State...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds RICO and Drug Distribution Conspiracy Convictions: Comprehensive Analysis

Eleventh Circuit Upholds RICO and Drug Distribution Conspiracy Convictions: Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jan 7, 1997
Eleventh Circuit Upholds RICO and Drug Distribution Conspiracy Convictions: Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ralph E. Brazel, Jr., Charles Hubbard, Norman...
Reaffirming ADA Protections for Chronic Conditions: Harris v. H W Contracting Company

Reaffirming ADA Protections for Chronic Conditions: Harris v. H W Contracting Company

Date: Jan 1, 1997
Reaffirming ADA Protections for Chronic Conditions: Harris v. H W Contracting Company Introduction Harris v. H W Contracting Company (102 F.3d 516, 1996) is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Assessing 'Substantially Justified' Positions for Prevailing Party Status under 26 U.S.C. §7430: Insights from Grants v. Commissioner

Assessing 'Substantially Justified' Positions for Prevailing Party Status under 26 U.S.C. §7430: Insights from Grants v. Commissioner

Date: Jan 1, 1997
Assessing 'Substantially Justified' Positions for Prevailing Party Status under 26 U.S.C. §7430: Insights from Grants v. Commissioner Introduction The case of David L. and Fagale D. Grant v....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rooney v. Watson: Limits of Section 1983 Claims Against Police Negligence

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rooney v. Watson: Limits of Section 1983 Claims Against Police Negligence

Date: Dec 27, 1996
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rooney v. Watson: Limits of Section 1983 Claims Against Police Negligence Introduction In John Rooney, III, John Rooney, Jr., Marsha Rooney, Keith Rooney, By and...
Legitimate Grounds for Termination Under Title VII: Insights from Mayfield v. Patterson Pump Company

Legitimate Grounds for Termination Under Title VII: Insights from Mayfield v. Patterson Pump Company

Date: Dec 21, 1996
Legitimate Grounds for Termination Under Title VII: Insights from Mayfield v. Patterson Pump Company Introduction Christopher Todd Mayfield, an African-American employee, filed a lawsuit against his...
District Judges Authorized to Issue Certificates of Appealability under AEDPA: Analysis of Hunter v. United States

District Judges Authorized to Issue Certificates of Appealability under AEDPA: Analysis of Hunter v. United States

Date: Dec 11, 1996
District Judges Authorized to Issue Certificates of Appealability under AEDPA: Analysis of Hunter v. United States Introduction The case of Charles Edward Hunter v. United States, decided on December...
Redefining 'Disability' under the ADA: Analysis of Mer v. Gordon, 100 F.3d 907

Redefining 'Disability' under the ADA: Analysis of Mer v. Gordon, 100 F.3d 907

Date: Dec 5, 1996
Redefining 'Disability' under the ADA: Analysis of Mer v. Gordon, 100 F.3d 907 Introduction Mer v. Gordon, 100 F.3d 907 (11th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case that delves into the interpretation of the...
Receipt of Benefits Doctrine Under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) Affirmed in In re Paul A. Bilzerian

Receipt of Benefits Doctrine Under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) Affirmed in In re Paul A. Bilzerian

Date: Dec 4, 1996
Receipt of Benefits Doctrine Under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) Affirmed in In re Paul A. Bilzerian Introduction In re Paul A. Bilzerian, 100 F.3d 886 (11th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Affirmation of IRS Levy on Fixed and Determinable Obligations in Bankruptcy Estates: United States v. Andrea A. Ruff

Affirmation of IRS Levy on Fixed and Determinable Obligations in Bankruptcy Estates: United States v. Andrea A. Ruff

Date: Nov 22, 1996
Affirmation of IRS Levy on Fixed and Determinable Obligations in Bankruptcy Estates: United States v. Andrea A. Ruff Introduction The case of United States of America v. Andrea A. Ruff (99 F.3d 1559)...
Establishing Dual Basis Remands in Social Security Disability Cases: Insights from Jackson v. Chater

Establishing Dual Basis Remands in Social Security Disability Cases: Insights from Jackson v. Chater

Date: Nov 21, 1996
Establishing Dual Basis Remands in Social Security Disability Cases: Insights from Jackson v. Chater Introduction In the landmark case of Donald B. Jackson v. Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert