Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit in Benson v. Tocco: Strengthening ADEA Age Discrimination Claims through Statistical Evidence and Pretext Analysis

Eleventh Circuit in Benson v. Tocco: Strengthening ADEA Age Discrimination Claims through Statistical Evidence and Pretext Analysis

Date: Jun 3, 1997
Eleventh Circuit in Benson v. Tocco: Strengthening ADEA Age Discrimination Claims through Statistical Evidence and Pretext Analysis Introduction The case of Frederick B. Benson et al. v. Tocco, Inc....
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in School Search Cases: Jenkins v. Talladega City Board of Education

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in School Search Cases: Jenkins v. Talladega City Board of Education

Date: Jun 3, 1997
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in School Search Cases: Jenkins v. Talladega City Board of Education Introduction Jenkins v. Talladega City Board of Education is a pivotal case that addresses the...
Appellate Jurisdiction Limits in Remand Orders: Insights from New v. Sports Recreation, Inc.

Appellate Jurisdiction Limits in Remand Orders: Insights from New v. Sports Recreation, Inc.

Date: May 31, 1997
Appellate Jurisdiction Limits in Remand Orders: Insights from New v. Sports Recreation, Inc. Introduction The case of Jeanette E. New v. Sports Recreation, Inc. (114 F.3d 1092) presented critical...
Pretrial Detainees Excluded from FLSA Coverage: Villarreal v. Woodham

Pretrial Detainees Excluded from FLSA Coverage: Villarreal v. Woodham

Date: May 30, 1997
Pretrial Detainees Excluded from FLSA Coverage: Villarreal v. Woodham Introduction In Frutoso Villarreal v. William A. Woodham, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed a...
Affirmation of Traffic Stop Legitimacy in United States v. Holloman

Affirmation of Traffic Stop Legitimacy in United States v. Holloman

Date: May 23, 1997
Affirmation of Traffic Stop Legitimacy in United States v. Holloman Introduction United States v. Tony L. Holloman, 113 F.3d 192 (11th Cir. 1997), addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Derivative Standing for Provider-Assignees and Affirms 'Make Whole' Doctrine under ERISA in CAGLE v. BRUNER

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Derivative Standing for Provider-Assignees and Affirms 'Make Whole' Doctrine under ERISA in CAGLE v. BRUNER

Date: May 23, 1997
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Derivative Standing for Provider-Assignees and Affirms 'Make Whole' Doctrine under ERISA in CAGLE v. BRUNER Introduction In the landmark case Doug CAGLE et al. v. Nancy...
Holbrook v. City of Alpharetta: Defining Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA

Holbrook v. City of Alpharetta: Defining Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA

Date: May 23, 1997
Holbrook v. City of Alpharetta: Defining Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA Introduction In Holbrook v. City of Alpharetta, 112 F.3d 1522 (11th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Remand Granted in Coleman v. Crown Stations: Jurisdictional Insights in Nuisance Claims

Remand Granted in Coleman v. Crown Stations: Jurisdictional Insights in Nuisance Claims

Date: May 22, 1997
Remand Granted in Coleman v. Crown Stations: Jurisdictional Insights in Nuisance Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Arthur L. Crowe, Jr., Edith Crowe Ingram, Eleanor Ingram Kiefling v....
Clarifying the Distinction Between "Use" and "Carry" in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Analysis of United States v. Chirinos et al.

Clarifying the Distinction Between "Use" and "Carry" in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Analysis of United States v. Chirinos et al.

Date: May 16, 1997
Clarifying the Distinction Between "Use" and "Carry" in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1): Analysis of United States v. Chirinos et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Samuel Chirinos,...
Limitations on Rule 54(b) Certification: Insights from Ebrahimi v. Huntsville Board of Education

Limitations on Rule 54(b) Certification: Insights from Ebrahimi v. Huntsville Board of Education

Date: May 10, 1997
Limitations on Rule 54(b) Certification: Insights from Ebrahimi v. Huntsville Board of Education Introduction In Ebrahimi v. City of Huntsville Board of Education, 114 F.3d 162 (11th Cir. 1997),...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds PLRA's Retroactive Application and Validates Filing Fee Provisions under Equal Protection

Eleventh Circuit Upholds PLRA's Retroactive Application and Validates Filing Fee Provisions under Equal Protection

Date: May 7, 1997
Eleventh Circuit Upholds PLRA's Retroactive Application and Validates Filing Fee Provisions under Equal Protection Introduction The case of Henry Greene Mitchell v. Dave Farcass, adjudicated by the...
Mootness and Waiver of Damages Claims in First Amendment Challenges: Adler v. Duval County School Board

Mootness and Waiver of Damages Claims in First Amendment Challenges: Adler v. Duval County School Board

Date: May 7, 1997
Mootness and Waiver of Damages Claims in First Amendment Challenges: Adler v. Duval County School Board Introduction Adler v. Duval County School Board, 112 F.3d 1475 (11th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal...
Law of the Case Doctrine Reinforced in United States v. Escobar-Urrego

Law of the Case Doctrine Reinforced in United States v. Escobar-Urrego

Date: May 2, 1997
Law of the Case Doctrine Reinforced in United States v. Escobar-Urrego Introduction In United States v. Escobar-Urrego, 110 F.3d 1556 (11th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Mandatory Exhaustion of ERISA Administrative Remedies: Affirmation in J.W. Counts v. American General

Mandatory Exhaustion of ERISA Administrative Remedies: Affirmation in J.W. Counts v. American General

Date: Apr 30, 1997
Mandatory Exhaustion of ERISA Administrative Remedies: Affirmation in J.W. Counts v. American General Introduction The case J.W. Counts v. American General Life and Accident Insurance Company,...
Limitations on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: In re William Boshears

Limitations on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: In re William Boshears

Date: Apr 11, 1997
Limitations on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: In re William Boshears Introduction In re William Boshears is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
ERISA Preemption Does Not Extend to Non-ERISA Benefits within Multibenefit Plans

ERISA Preemption Does Not Extend to Non-ERISA Benefits within Multibenefit Plans

Date: Apr 9, 1997
ERISA Preemption Does Not Extend to Non-ERISA Benefits within Multibenefit Plans Introduction In the landmark case Kemp, Wilson & Wilson v. International Business Machines Corporation, the United...
Burden of Proof in ADA Disability Discrimination Claims: Plaintiff's Obligation to Demonstrate Reasonable Accommodation

Burden of Proof in ADA Disability Discrimination Claims: Plaintiff's Obligation to Demonstrate Reasonable Accommodation

Date: Mar 26, 1997
Burden of Proof in ADA Disability Discrimination Claims: Plaintiff's Obligation to Demonstrate Reasonable Accommodation Introduction The case of Lynda L. Willis v. Conopco, Inc. addresses crucial...
Preserving AEDPA Restrictions on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from In re: Pedro Medina

Preserving AEDPA Restrictions on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from In re: Pedro Medina

Date: Mar 25, 1997
Preserving AEDPA Restrictions on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from In re: Pedro Medina Introduction The case of In re: Pedro Medina, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Maddow v. Procter & Gamble: Establishing Precedents in Age Discrimination under the ADEA

Maddow v. Procter & Gamble: Establishing Precedents in Age Discrimination under the ADEA

Date: Mar 20, 1997
Maddow v. Procter & Gamble: Establishing Precedents in Age Discrimination under the ADEA Introduction The case Cecile L. Maddow, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated persons v....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Individual Medigap Insurance Policies Not Governed by MSP Statute or RICO

Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Individual Medigap Insurance Policies Not Governed by MSP Statute or RICO

Date: Mar 12, 1997
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Individual Medigap Insurance Policies Not Governed by MSP Statute or RICO Introduction In the case of Nadine Brooks et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert