Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Separate Entity Status under Title VII: Laurie v. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Affirmation of Separate Entity Status under Title VII: Laurie v. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Affirmation of Separate Entity Status under Title VII: Laurie v. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Introduction The case Jackie Laurie and Barbara Lindsey v. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals...
Strict Compliance Required for Timely EEOC Filing in ADA Discrimination Cases: MAYNARD v. PNEUMATIC PRODUCTS CORP.

Strict Compliance Required for Timely EEOC Filing in ADA Discrimination Cases: MAYNARD v. PNEUMATIC PRODUCTS CORP.

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Strict Compliance Required for Timely EEOC Filing in ADA Discrimination Cases: MAYNARD v. PNEUMATIC PRODUCTS CORP. Introduction Donald C. Maynard, an assembly line worker, was employed by Pneumatic...
Reaffirming Central Bank: Limits on Primary Liability of Accounting and Law Firms under Section 10(b) - ZIEMBA v. CASCADE INTERNATIONAL

Reaffirming Central Bank: Limits on Primary Liability of Accounting and Law Firms under Section 10(b) - ZIEMBA v. CASCADE INTERNATIONAL

Date: Jul 12, 2001
Reaffirming Central Bank: Limits on Primary Liability of Accounting and Law Firms under Section 10(b) Introduction The case of James ZIEMBA, Patricia MacDougle, et. al. v. Cascade International,...
Affirmation of Employer Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Middlebrooks v. Hillcrest Foods

Affirmation of Employer Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Middlebrooks v. Hillcrest Foods

Date: Jul 12, 2001
Affirmation of Employer Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Middlebrooks v. Hillcrest Foods Introduction Middlebrooks v. Hillcrest Foods, Inc., 256 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir. 2001),...
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Financial Conflict of Interest in §2255 Petitions: Insights from Caderno v. United States

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Financial Conflict of Interest in §2255 Petitions: Insights from Caderno v. United States

Date: Jul 12, 2001
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Financial Conflict of Interest in §2255 Petitions: Insights from Caderno v. United States Introduction The case of Juan Vincente Caderno v. United States addresses...
Enhancing Scienter Standards in Securities Fraud Class Actions: Theoharous and Schuette v. Fong et al.

Enhancing Scienter Standards in Securities Fraud Class Actions: Theoharous and Schuette v. Fong et al.

Date: Jul 12, 2001
Enhancing Scienter Standards in Securities Fraud Class Actions: Theoharous and Schuette v. Fong et al. Introduction In Theoharous and Schuette v. Fong et al., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Collateral Estoppel Precludes Tortious Interference Claims: McMahan v. TOTO

Collateral Estoppel Precludes Tortious Interference Claims: McMahan v. TOTO

Date: Jul 11, 2001
Collateral Estoppel Precludes Tortious Interference Claims: McMahan v. TOTO Introduction McMahan v. TOTO is a significant appellate decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Reaffirming Impeachment Standards under Federal Rule of Evidence 806 in Conspiracy Cases: Grant v. United States

Reaffirming Impeachment Standards under Federal Rule of Evidence 806 in Conspiracy Cases: Grant v. United States

Date: Jul 11, 2001
Reaffirming Impeachment Standards under Federal Rule of Evidence 806 in Conspiracy Cases: Grant v. United States Introduction In United States v. Nicholas Grant, 256 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir. 2001), the...
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies: Eleventh Circuit's Application of Boerckel in Smith v. Jones

Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies: Eleventh Circuit's Application of Boerckel in Smith v. Jones

Date: Jul 11, 2001
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies: Eleventh Circuit's Application of Boerckel in Smith v. Jones Introduction Smith v. Jones is a landmark decision rendered by the United States...
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in JOHNSON v. STATE of Alabama

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in JOHNSON v. STATE of Alabama

Date: Jul 11, 2001
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in JOHNSON v. STATE of Alabama Introduction Case: Anthony Keith JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of ALABAMA, John E. Nagle,...
Standing in ADA Cases for Injunctive Relief: Insights from Shotz v. Cates

Standing in ADA Cases for Injunctive Relief: Insights from Shotz v. Cates

Date: Jul 10, 2001
Standing in ADA Cases for Injunctive Relief: Insights from Shotz v. Cates Introduction The case of Frederick Arthur Shotz and Joseph Tacl v. Robert P. Cates addresses significant issues under the...
Reverse Discrimination Revisited: Bass v. Orange County Commissioners Establishes New Precedent on Affirmative Action Practices

Reverse Discrimination Revisited: Bass v. Orange County Commissioners Establishes New Precedent on Affirmative Action Practices

Date: Jul 10, 2001
Reverse Discrimination Revisited: Bass v. Orange County Commissioners Establishes New Precedent on Affirmative Action Practices Introduction In Michael W. Bass v. Board of County Commissioners,...
Tolling Federal Habeas Corpus Limitations: Insights from Tinker v. Moore

Tolling Federal Habeas Corpus Limitations: Insights from Tinker v. Moore

Date: Jul 7, 2001
Tolling Federal Habeas Corpus Limitations: Insights from Tinker v. Moore Introduction Gerald Tinker v. Michael W. Moore, 255 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2001), represents a pivotal case in the realm of...
Intake Questionnaires Do Not Qualify as Formal EEOC Charges under Title VII: Insights from Pijnenburg v. West Georgia Health System

Intake Questionnaires Do Not Qualify as Formal EEOC Charges under Title VII: Insights from Pijnenburg v. West Georgia Health System

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Intake Questionnaires Do Not Qualify as Formal EEOC Charges under Title VII: Insights from Pijnenburg v. West Georgia Health System Introduction The case of Robin Pijnenburg v. West Georgia Health...
Thompson v. Haley: Upholding Conviction and Affirming Standards for Effective Counsel and Voluntary Confessions

Thompson v. Haley: Upholding Conviction and Affirming Standards for Effective Counsel and Voluntary Confessions

Date: Jul 4, 2001
Thompson v. Haley: Upholding Conviction and Affirming Standards for Effective Counsel and Voluntary Confessions Introduction In Thompson v. Haley, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Murder: The Gary Leon Brown Case

Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Murder: The Gary Leon Brown Case

Date: Jun 30, 2001
Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Murder: The Gary Leon Brown Case Introduction The case of Gary Leon Brown v. Charlie P. Jones, adjudicated in the United States Court of...
Public Benefit as a Measure of Success in §1988 Attorney Fee Awards: Villano v. City of Boynton Beach Analysis

Public Benefit as a Measure of Success in §1988 Attorney Fee Awards: Villano v. City of Boynton Beach Analysis

Date: Jun 28, 2001
Public Benefit as a Measure of Success in §1988 Attorney Fee Awards: Villano v. City of Boynton Beach Analysis Introduction Jason Villano v. City of Boynton Beach, 254 F.3d 1302 (11th Cir. 2001), is...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Statute of Limitations: Insights from Arsenio Leal v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Statute of Limitations: Insights from Arsenio Leal v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Date: Jun 26, 2001
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Statute of Limitations: Insights from Arsenio Leal v. Georgia Department of Corrections Introduction In the landmark case of Arsenio Leal v. Georgia...
Appellate Unreviewability of Summary Judgment Denials Post-Trial: Lind v. United Parcel Service

Appellate Unreviewability of Summary Judgment Denials Post-Trial: Lind v. United Parcel Service

Date: Jun 26, 2001
Appellate Unreviewability of Summary Judgment Denials Post-Trial: Lind v. United Parcel Service Introduction In the case of Michelle Lind v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (254 F.3d 1281), the United...
SAXTON v. ACF INDUSTRIES: 11th Circuit Incorporates Alabama's Relation-Back Rules under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(1)

SAXTON v. ACF INDUSTRIES: 11th Circuit Incorporates Alabama's Relation-Back Rules under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(1)

Date: Jun 19, 2001
SAXTON v. ACF INDUSTRIES: 11th Circuit Incorporates Alabama's Relation-Back Rules under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(1) Introduction SAXTON v. ACF INDUSTRIES, Inc., 254 F.3d 959 (11th Cir. 2001), is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert