Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity Limits Medicaid Recipients' Claims on State's Tobacco Settlement Proceeds

Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity Limits Medicaid Recipients' Claims on State's Tobacco Settlement Proceeds

Date: Aug 18, 2001
Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity Limits Medicaid Recipients' Claims on State's Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Introduction The case of Niccie McClendon et al. v. Georgia Department of Community...
Admitting External Judicial Opinions as Hearsay: A Reversible Error under Fed.R.Evid. 403

Admitting External Judicial Opinions as Hearsay: A Reversible Error under Fed.R.Evid. 403

Date: Aug 18, 2001
Admitting External Judicial Opinions as Hearsay: A Reversible Error under Fed.R.Evid. 403 Introduction In the case of United States Steel, LLC, Heatherwood Golf Club, Inc.,...
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces 'Use in Commerce' Standard for Unregistered Trademarks in Internet Software Distribution

Eleventh Circuit Reinforces 'Use in Commerce' Standard for Unregistered Trademarks in Internet Software Distribution

Date: Aug 17, 2001
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces 'Use in Commerce' Standard for Unregistered Trademarks in Internet Software Distribution Introduction The case of Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc. adjudicated...
Affirmation of Strickland Standards Under AEDPA for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Cases

Affirmation of Strickland Standards Under AEDPA for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Cases

Date: Aug 17, 2001
Affirmation of Strickland Standards Under AEDPA for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Cases Introduction The case of Wallace M. Fugate, III v. Frederick J. Head addresses pivotal issues...
Retroactive Application of Aggravated Felony Definition Upheld: Mohammed v. Ashcroft

Retroactive Application of Aggravated Felony Definition Upheld: Mohammed v. Ashcroft

Date: Aug 17, 2001
Retroactive Application of Aggravated Felony Definition Upheld: Mohammed v. Ashcroft Introduction In Hamid B. Mohammed v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization Service,...
Unconstitutional Strip Searches of Students Without Individualized Suspicion: Thomas v. Roberts

Unconstitutional Strip Searches of Students Without Individualized Suspicion: Thomas v. Roberts

Date: Aug 16, 2001
Unconstitutional Strip Searches of Students Without Individualized Suspicion: Thomas v. Roberts Introduction Thomas v. Roberts is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Willingham v. Loughnan: Establishing Qualified Immunity Parameters in Section 1983 Claims

Willingham v. Loughnan: Establishing Qualified Immunity Parameters in Section 1983 Claims

Date: Aug 16, 2001
Willingham v. Loughnan: Establishing Qualified Immunity Parameters in Section 1983 Claims Introduction Willingham v. Loughnan, Brian Buecler, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, 261 F.3d 1178...
Misuse of RICO in Medical Malpractice Litigation: Implications for Rule 11 and Monetary Sanctions

Misuse of RICO in Medical Malpractice Litigation: Implications for Rule 11 and Monetary Sanctions

Date: Aug 15, 2001
Misuse of RICO in Medical Malpractice Litigation: Implications for Rule 11 and Monetary Sanctions Introduction In the case of Michael T. Byrne, Mo v. nt-Appellant, Debra Manov, the United States...
Limits on Licensee's Discretion and Protection Against Tortious Interference in Dealership Transfers: Analysis of Haire Ford v. Ford Motor Company

Limits on Licensee's Discretion and Protection Against Tortious Interference in Dealership Transfers: Analysis of Haire Ford v. Ford Motor Company

Date: Aug 9, 2001
Limits on Licensee's Discretion and Protection Against Tortious Interference in Dealership Transfers Analysis of Haire Ford v. Ford Motor Company, 260 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2001) Introduction The case...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scope of Sovereign Immunity in Police Negligence Claims: Distinction Between Discretionary and Operational Acts

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scope of Sovereign Immunity in Police Negligence Claims: Distinction Between Discretionary and Operational Acts

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scope of Sovereign Immunity in Police Negligence Claims: Distinction Between Discretionary and Operational Acts Introduction In the case of Pamela Lewis, As Personal...
Redefining Commission-Based Payment Systems under FLSA: Klinedinst v. Swift Investments

Redefining Commission-Based Payment Systems under FLSA: Klinedinst v. Swift Investments

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Redefining Commission-Based Payment Systems under FLSA: Klinedinst v. Swift Investments Introduction The case of Tracy Klinedinst v. Swift Investments, Inc. (260 F.3d 1251, 11th Cir. 2001) presents a...
Goodman v. Sipos: Defining the Boundaries of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Juvenile Custody §1983 Claims

Goodman v. Sipos: Defining the Boundaries of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Juvenile Custody §1983 Claims

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Goodman v. Sipos: Defining the Boundaries of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Juvenile Custody §1983 Claims Introduction The case of Kim Goodman v. Patricia Sipos and D'Anna Liber (259 F.3d 1327) presents...
Affirmation of 28 U.S.C.A. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) in Deterring Meritless Prisoner Litigation

Affirmation of 28 U.S.C.A. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) in Deterring Meritless Prisoner Litigation

Date: Aug 2, 2001
Affirmation of 28 U.S.C.A. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) in Deterring Meritless Prisoner Litigation Introduction Jack Vanderberg, a pro se prisoner, filed a lawsuit against R. Donaldson, a correctional officer,...
Abrogation of Derivative Jurisdiction: Insights from Hollis v. Florida State University

Abrogation of Derivative Jurisdiction: Insights from Hollis v. Florida State University

Date: Jul 31, 2001
Abrogation of Derivative Jurisdiction: Insights from Hollis v. Florida State University Introduction Hollis v. Florida State University (259 F.3d 1295, 11th Cir. 2001) is a pivotal case that...
Jurisdictional Bar Under IIRIRA §1252(a)(2)(C) Prevents Review of Expunged Convictions for Immigration Removal

Jurisdictional Bar Under IIRIRA §1252(a)(2)(C) Prevents Review of Expunged Convictions for Immigration Removal

Date: Jul 20, 2001
Jurisdictional Bar Under IIRIRA §1252(a)(2)(C) Prevents Review of Expunged Convictions for Immigration Removal Introduction The case of Luis Ernesto Fernandez-Bernal v. Attorney General of the United...
Affirmation of Deportation Orders: Substantial Evidence and Appellate Review Under IIRIRA

Affirmation of Deportation Orders: Substantial Evidence and Appellate Review Under IIRIRA

Date: Jul 19, 2001
Affirmation of Deportation Orders: Substantial Evidence and Appellate Review Under IIRIRA Introduction In the case of Fedaa Al Najjar and Mazen Al Najjar v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, U.S....
Association Discrimination Under ADA: Insights from Wascura v. City of South Miami

Association Discrimination Under ADA: Insights from Wascura v. City of South Miami

Date: Jul 18, 2001
Association Discrimination Under ADA: Insights from Wascura v. City of South Miami Introduction The landmark case Rosemary J. Wascura v. City of South Miami addressed critical issues under the ADA...
Lucas v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.: Elucidating ADA's Requirements for Reasonable Accommodation and Retaliation Claims

Lucas v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.: Elucidating ADA's Requirements for Reasonable Accommodation and Retaliation Claims

Date: Jul 18, 2001
Lucas v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.: Elucidating ADA's Requirements for Reasonable Accommodation and Retaliation Claims Introduction Lucas v. W.W. Grainger, Inc., 257 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2001), is a...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Grayson v. Thompson

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Grayson v. Thompson

Date: Jul 17, 2001
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Grayson v. Thompson Introduction Grayson v. Thompson (257 F.3d 1194, 2001) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Functional Equivalence of Appeal Motions and Set-Off of §1983 Awards in Rinaldo v. Corbett

Functional Equivalence of Appeal Motions and Set-Off of §1983 Awards in Rinaldo v. Corbett

Date: Jul 14, 2001
Functional Equivalence of Appeal Motions and Set-Off of §1983 Awards in Rinaldo v. Corbett Introduction The case of Richard M. Rinaldo, a.k.a. Muhammed Abdul Muhammed, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert