Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Strict Standards for Sua Sponte Dismissal with Prejudice Established in Betty K Agencies Ltd. v. Tidal Wave Limited

Strict Standards for Sua Sponte Dismissal with Prejudice Established in Betty K Agencies Ltd. v. Tidal Wave Limited

Date: Dec 17, 2005
Strict Standards for Sua Sponte Dismissal with Prejudice Established in Betty K Agencies Ltd. v. Tidal Wave Limited Introduction The case of Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. Tidal Wave Limited, adjudicated...
Affirmation and Reversal: Evidentiary Errors and Harmless Error Analysis in United States v. Mar (432 F.3d 1189)

Affirmation and Reversal: Evidentiary Errors and Harmless Error Analysis in United States v. Mar (432 F.3d 1189)

Date: Dec 14, 2005
Affirmation and Reversal: Evidentiary Errors and Harmless Error Analysis in United States v. Mar (432 F.3d 1189) Introduction In the case of United States v. Mar (432 F.3d 1189), the United States...
Rule 404(b) Evidence Admissibility in Conspiracy Charges: Insights from United States v. Matthews

Rule 404(b) Evidence Admissibility in Conspiracy Charges: Insights from United States v. Matthews

Date: Dec 7, 2005
Rule 404(b) Evidence Admissibility in Conspiracy Charges: Insights from United States v. Matthews Introduction United States v. Terrance Matthews is a pivotal decision from the United States Court of...
District Courts' Flexibility in Considering Sentencing Factors Under § 3553(a): Insights from United States v. Talley

District Courts' Flexibility in Considering Sentencing Factors Under § 3553(a): Insights from United States v. Talley

Date: Dec 3, 2005
District Courts' Flexibility in Considering Sentencing Factors Under § 3553(a): Insights from United States v. Talley Introduction In United States v. John Kevin Talley, 431 F.3d 784 (11th Cir....
Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in Sibley v. Lando et al. (437 F.3d 1067)

Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in Sibley v. Lando et al. (437 F.3d 1067)

Date: Nov 30, 2005
Affirmation of Judicial Immunity in Sibley v. Lando et al. (437 F.3d 1067) Introduction In Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Maxine Cohen Lando, Alan R. Schwartz, Mario P. Goderich, 437 F.3d 1067 (11th Cir....
Standing of Loss Payees under English Law: Transamerica Leasing, Inc. v. Institute of London Underwriters

Standing of Loss Payees under English Law: Transamerica Leasing, Inc. v. Institute of London Underwriters

Date: Nov 23, 2005
Standing of Loss Payees under English Law: Transamerica Leasing, Inc. v. Institute of London Underwriters Introduction The case of Transamerica Leasing, Inc. v. Institute of London Underwriters,...
Affirmation of Denial of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim in PTSD Evidence Context

Affirmation of Denial of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim in PTSD Evidence Context

Date: Nov 22, 2005
Affirmation of Denial of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim in PTSD Evidence Context Introduction In the case of Linda Michael v. James Crosby, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Georgia Law Renders Noncompetition Agreement Unenforceable: Insights from Manuel v. Convergys

Georgia Law Renders Noncompetition Agreement Unenforceable: Insights from Manuel v. Convergys

Date: Nov 16, 2005
Georgia Law Renders Noncompetition Agreement Unenforceable: Insights from Manuel v. Convergys Introduction The case of William S. Manuel v. Convergys Corporation addresses the enforceability of...
CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON Does Not Apply to Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Cantellano

CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON Does Not Apply to Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Cantellano

Date: Nov 16, 2005
CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON Does Not Apply to Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Cantellano Introduction In United States v. Cantellano, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Reaffirming the Strickland Standard: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Upheld in Marquard v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections

Reaffirming the Strickland Standard: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Upheld in Marquard v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections

Date: Nov 11, 2005
Reaffirming the Strickland Standard: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Upheld in Marquard v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections Introduction In the landmark case of Marquard v....
United States v. Moriarty: Affirmation of Conviction Amid Rule 11 Deficiencies and Sentencing Clarifications

United States v. Moriarty: Affirmation of Conviction Amid Rule 11 Deficiencies and Sentencing Clarifications

Date: Nov 2, 2005
United States v. Moriarty: Affirmation of Conviction Amid Rule 11 Deficiencies and Sentencing Clarifications Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Jason M. Moriarty, 429...
Enforceability of Employer-Imposed Arbitration Agreements: Insights from Lee v. Gulfstream Aerospace

Enforceability of Employer-Imposed Arbitration Agreements: Insights from Lee v. Gulfstream Aerospace

Date: Nov 1, 2005
Enforceability of Employer-Imposed Arbitration Agreements: Insights from Lee v. Gulfstream Aerospace Introduction In the landmark case Lee CALEY, William Etzel, Stanley Walker, and all persons...
Cruz v. Publix Super Markets: Clarifying FMLA Notice Requirements for Unforeseeable Leave

Cruz v. Publix Super Markets: Clarifying FMLA Notice Requirements for Unforeseeable Leave

Date: Nov 1, 2005
Cruz v. Publix Super Markets: Clarifying FMLA Notice Requirements for Unforeseeable Leave Introduction In the landmark case June Cruz v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., decided by the United States Court...
Legg v. Wyeth: Reinforcing Standards for Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction

Legg v. Wyeth: Reinforcing Standards for Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Oct 26, 2005
Legg v. Wyeth: Reinforcing Standards for Fraudulent Joinder in Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction In the appellate case Carl Legg, Dorothy Legg v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States...
Corsello v. Lincare: Reinforcing the Particularity Requirement under the False Claims Act

Corsello v. Lincare: Reinforcing the Particularity Requirement under the False Claims Act

Date: Oct 21, 2005
Corsello v. Lincare: Reinforcing the Particularity Requirement under the False Claims Act Introduction The case of Kirk S. Corsello v. Lincare, Inc., et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
United States v. Ochoa-Vasquez: Navigating First Amendment Access and Batson Challenges within Anonymous Jury Proceedings

United States v. Ochoa-Vasquez: Navigating First Amendment Access and Batson Challenges within Anonymous Jury Proceedings

Date: Oct 21, 2005
United States v. Ochoa-Vasquez: Navigating First Amendment Access and Batson Challenges within Anonymous Jury Proceedings Introduction United States v. Fabio Ochoa-Vasquez is a significant judgment...
The Limits of Judicial Review in Asylum Claims Post-Real ID Act: Chacon-Botero v. U.S. Attorney General

The Limits of Judicial Review in Asylum Claims Post-Real ID Act: Chacon-Botero v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Oct 7, 2005
The Limits of Judicial Review in Asylum Claims Post-Real ID Act: Chacon-Botero v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction Chacon-Botero v. U.S. Attorney General, 427 F.3d 954 (11th Cir. 2005), is a...
Actual Receipt of Right-to-Sue Letters as Trigger for Statute of Limitations Under ADEA

Actual Receipt of Right-to-Sue Letters as Trigger for Statute of Limitations Under ADEA

Date: Oct 7, 2005
Actual Receipt of Right-to-Sue Letters as Trigger for Statute of Limitations Under ADEA Introduction The case of Christine Kerr and Pat Green Smith v. McDonald’s Corporation, adjudicated by the...
Enhancing Sanctions for Spoliation of Critical Evidence: Flury v. Daimler Chrysler Corporation

Enhancing Sanctions for Spoliation of Critical Evidence: Flury v. Daimler Chrysler Corporation

Date: Oct 6, 2005
Enhancing Sanctions for Spoliation of Critical Evidence: Flury v. Daimler Chrysler Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Bryant Flury v. Daimler Chrysler Corporation, the United States...
CALLAHAN v. CAMPBELL: Standards for Judicial Recusal and Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Cases

CALLAHAN v. CAMPBELL: Standards for Judicial Recusal and Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Oct 6, 2005
CALLAHAN v. CAMPBELL: Standards for Judicial Recusal and Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Cases Introduction James Callahan was convicted and sentenced to death in Alabama state court for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert