Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

In Pari Delicto Doctrine Bars Bankruptcy Trustee's RICO Claims: 11th Circuit Affirmation

In Pari Delicto Doctrine Bars Bankruptcy Trustee's RICO Claims: 11th Circuit Affirmation

Date: Jan 31, 2006
In Pari Delicto Doctrine Bars Bankruptcy Trustee's RICO Claims: 11th Circuit Affirmation Introduction The case of Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of PSA, Inc., et al. v. Charles Edwards, et...
Enhancing Prisoners' Privacy and Retaliation Protections Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Analysis of Boxer v. Harris

Enhancing Prisoners' Privacy and Retaliation Protections Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Analysis of Boxer v. Harris

Date: Jan 28, 2006
Enhancing Prisoners' Privacy and Retaliation Protections Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Analysis of Boxer v. Harris Introduction Boxer X v. A. Harris, 437 F.3d 1107 (11th Cir. 2006), is a significant...
Reversal of Dismissal in Levine v. Experian: Strengthening Consumer Protections under FCRA

Reversal of Dismissal in Levine v. Experian: Strengthening Consumer Protections under FCRA

Date: Jan 28, 2006
Reversal of Dismissal in Levine v. Experian: Strengthening Consumer Protections under FCRA Introduction The case of Stephen G. Levine v. World Financial Network National Bank, Structure, Inc., and...
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and AEDPA Principles in Habeas Corpus: The Krishna Maharaj Case

Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and AEDPA Principles in Habeas Corpus: The Krishna Maharaj Case

Date: Jan 26, 2006
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and AEDPA Principles in Habeas Corpus: The Krishna Maharaj Case Introduction Krishna Maharaj, a British national residing in South Florida, was convicted in a...
Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions

Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Jan 21, 2006
Affirmation of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Aaron Lee Jones v. Donal Campbell adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Judicial Finality: Limitations of Rule 60(b) in Vacating Favorable Judgments

Affirmation of Judicial Finality: Limitations of Rule 60(b) in Vacating Favorable Judgments

Date: Jan 12, 2006
Affirmation of Judicial Finality: Limitations of Rule 60(b) in Vacating Favorable Judgments Introduction The case of Sandra Cano v. Thurbert E. Baker et al. addresses the intricate interplay between...
Establishing Municipal Liability and Equal Protection in Zoning Decisions: Campbell v. Rainbow City

Establishing Municipal Liability and Equal Protection in Zoning Decisions: Campbell v. Rainbow City

Date: Jan 7, 2006
Establishing Municipal Liability and Equal Protection in Zoning Decisions: Campbell v. Rainbow City Introduction In the landmark case of Campbell v. Rainbow City, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Social Security Fraud Convictions in Immigration-Related Scheme: Analysis of United States v. Ndiaye et al. (434 F.3d 1270)

Affirmation of Conspiracy and Social Security Fraud Convictions in Immigration-Related Scheme: Analysis of United States v. Ndiaye et al. (434 F.3d 1270)

Date: Jan 7, 2006
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Social Security Fraud Convictions in Immigration-Related Scheme: Analysis of United States v. Ndiaye et al. (434 F.3d 1270) Introduction In United States v. Ndiaye et...
Affirmation of Equitable Tolling in Human Rights Claims Under TVPA and ATCA: ARCE v. GARCIA

Affirmation of Equitable Tolling in Human Rights Claims Under TVPA and ATCA: ARCE v. GARCIA

Date: Jan 5, 2006
Affirmation of Equitable Tolling in Human Rights Claims Under TVPA and ATCA: ARCE v. GARCIA Introduction Case: Arce, Gonzalez, and Mauricio v. Garcia and Casanova Court: United States Court of...
Clarifying the Causation Requirement in Title VII Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Cotton v. Cracker Barrel

Clarifying the Causation Requirement in Title VII Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Cotton v. Cracker Barrel

Date: Jan 5, 2006
Clarifying the Causation Requirement in Title VII Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Cotton v. Cracker Barrel Introduction Cotton v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (434...
Affirmation of Adverse Credibility Determination in Asylum and Withholding of Removal: Ruiz v. U.S. Attorney General

Affirmation of Adverse Credibility Determination in Asylum and Withholding of Removal: Ruiz v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Jan 5, 2006
Affirmation of Adverse Credibility Determination in Asylum and Withholding of Removal: Ruiz v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction The case of Jaime Ruiz and Sandra Milena Sanchez Cabrera v. U.S....
Affirmation of Prior-Conviction Exception: United States v. Gibson

Affirmation of Prior-Conviction Exception: United States v. Gibson

Date: Jan 5, 2006
Affirmation of Prior-Conviction Exception: United States v. Gibson Introduction The case of United States v. Steven Gibson, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
False Claims Act Enforcement Enhanced: Walker v. RF Properties Establishes Critical Precedent for Medicare Billing Practices

False Claims Act Enforcement Enhanced: Walker v. RF Properties Establishes Critical Precedent for Medicare Billing Practices

Date: Dec 31, 2005
False Claims Act Enforcement Enhanced: Walker v. RF Properties Establishes Critical Precedent for Medicare Billing Practices Introduction In the landmark case of United States ex rel. Karyn L. Walker...
Enforcement of Contractual Limitations Period in Fraud Claims: Maxcess Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.

Enforcement of Contractual Limitations Period in Fraud Claims: Maxcess Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.

Date: Dec 28, 2005
Enforcement of Contractual Limitations Period in Fraud Claims: Maxcess Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc. Introduction The case of Maxcess, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., decided by the United...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines Reassessment in United States v. Hernandez

Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines Reassessment in United States v. Hernandez

Date: Dec 28, 2005
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines Reassessment in United States v. Hernandez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Arturo Hernandez (433 F.3d 1328)...
Gomez-Diaz v. United States: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Limited Appeal Waivers in Effective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Gomez-Diaz v. United States: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Limited Appeal Waivers in Effective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Dec 21, 2005
Gomez-Diaz v. United States: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Limited Appeal Waivers in Effective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction The case of Francisco Gomez-Diaz a.k.a. Jose Gomer a.k.a. Joe...
Constructive Discharge in Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from Rowell v. BellSouth Corporation

Constructive Discharge in Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from Rowell v. BellSouth Corporation

Date: Dec 21, 2005
Constructive Discharge in Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from Rowell v. BellSouth Corporation Introduction Rowell v. BellSouth Corporation, 433 F.3d 794 (11th Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case in...
Divisibility of Grand Theft Statutes and Aggravated Felony Classification in Immigration Law: Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney General

Divisibility of Grand Theft Statutes and Aggravated Felony Classification in Immigration Law: Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Dec 20, 2005
Divisibility of Grand Theft Statutes and Aggravated Felony Classification in Immigration Law: Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney General is a pivotal case...
Arbitration Clause Enforceable Without Severability Clause When Incorporating AAA Rules: 11th Circuit Precedent

Arbitration Clause Enforceable Without Severability Clause When Incorporating AAA Rules: 11th Circuit Precedent

Date: Dec 17, 2005
Arbitration Clause Enforceable Without Severability Clause When Incorporating AAA Rules: 11th Circuit Precedent Introduction The case of Terminix International Company, LP v. Palmer Ranch Limited...
Limits on De Novo Review in Disability Discrimination Cases under the Rehabilitation Act

Limits on De Novo Review in Disability Discrimination Cases under the Rehabilitation Act

Date: Dec 17, 2005
Limits on De Novo Review in Disability Discrimination Cases under the Rehabilitation Act Introduction The case of David W. Ellis, Jr. v. Gordon R. England (432 F.3d 1321) adjudicated by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert