Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Good Faith Exception Applied in Search Warrant Invalidity: U.S. v. Otero

Good Faith Exception Applied in Search Warrant Invalidity: U.S. v. Otero

Date: Apr 29, 2009
Good Faith Exception Applied in Search Warrant Invalidity: United States v. Otero Introduction United States of America v. Loretta Otero, 563 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2009), is a pivotal case addressing...
Timeliness of Affirmative Defenses and Agent Authority: Insights from Creative Consumer Concepts v. Kreisler

Timeliness of Affirmative Defenses and Agent Authority: Insights from Creative Consumer Concepts v. Kreisler

Date: Apr 22, 2009
Timeliness of Affirmative Defenses and Agent Authority: Insights from Creative Consumer Concepts v. Kreisler Introduction Creative Consumer Concepts, Inc. v. Laura Kreisler, 563 F.3d 1070 (10th Cir....
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Custodial Death Due to Lack of Subjective Deliberate Indifference

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Custodial Death Due to Lack of Subjective Deliberate Indifference

Date: Apr 22, 2009
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Custodial Death Due to Lack of Subjective Deliberate Indifference Introduction In the case of Ginger Martinez, Individually and as Personal Representative of the...
Establishing Nexus: Probable Cause in Residence Searches Under the Tenth Circuit

Establishing Nexus: Probable Cause in Residence Searches Under the Tenth Circuit

Date: Apr 21, 2009
Establishing Nexus: Probable Cause in Residence Searches Under the Tenth Circuit Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael L. Biglow (562 F.3d 1272, 2009) presents a pivotal moment...
Mootness of Judicial Conduct Challenges Following Amendment of Kansas Code

Mootness of Judicial Conduct Challenges Following Amendment of Kansas Code

Date: Apr 18, 2009
Mootness of Judicial Conduct Challenges Following Amendment of Kansas Code Introduction The case of Kansas Judicial Review et al. v. Stout et al. addressed significant issues surrounding the...
Pinkerton v. Colorado Department of Transportation: Affirming Employer Defenses in Employment Discrimination Cases

Pinkerton v. Colorado Department of Transportation: Affirming Employer Defenses in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Apr 17, 2009
Pinkerton v. Colorado Department of Transportation: Affirming Employer Defenses in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction In the landmark appellate case Betty J. Pinkerton v. Colorado...
Deliberate Indifference in Disability Discrimination: Barber v. Colorado Department of Revenue

Deliberate Indifference in Disability Discrimination: Barber v. Colorado Department of Revenue

Date: Apr 16, 2009
Deliberate Indifference in Disability Discrimination: Barber v. Colorado Department of Revenue Introduction Barber v. Colorado Department of Revenue is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Material Differences and Trademark Infringement: Interpretation of the First Sale Doctrine in BELTRONICS USA, INC. v. MIDWEST INVENTORY DISTRIBUTION, LLC

Material Differences and Trademark Infringement: Interpretation of the First Sale Doctrine in BELTRONICS USA, INC. v. MIDWEST INVENTORY DISTRIBUTION, LLC

Date: Apr 10, 2009
Material Differences and Trademark Infringement: Interpretation of the First Sale Doctrine in BELTRONICS USA, INC. v. MIDWEST INVENTORY DISTRIBUTION, LLC Introduction The case of BELTRONICS USA, INC....
Proper Consideration of Treating Physicians’ Opinions in Disability Claims: Andersen v. Astrue

Proper Consideration of Treating Physicians’ Opinions in Disability Claims: Andersen v. Astrue

Date: Apr 4, 2009
Proper Consideration of Treating Physicians’ Opinions in Disability Claims: Andersen v. Astrue Introduction In the landmark case of Terry D. Andersen v. Michael J. Astrue, adjudicated by the United...
CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON Not Extending to Suppression Hearings: Analysis of U.S. v. Garcia

CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON Not Extending to Suppression Hearings: Analysis of U.S. v. Garcia

Date: Apr 3, 2009
CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON Not Extending to Suppression Hearings: Analysis of U.S. v. Garcia Introduction United States of America v. Jose Pedro Garcia is a significant appellate case decided by the...
Inmate Accident Compensation Act Does Not Bar Bivens Claims Against Individual Federal Officials: Smith v. United States

Inmate Accident Compensation Act Does Not Bar Bivens Claims Against Individual Federal Officials: Smith v. United States

Date: Apr 1, 2009
Inmate Accident Compensation Act Does Not Bar Bivens Claims Against Individual Federal Officials: Smith v. United States Introduction Byron Smith, the plaintiff-appellant, initiated litigation...
Affirmation of Wire Fraud Conviction and Reversal of Money Laundering Conviction in Caldwell v. United States

Affirmation of Wire Fraud Conviction and Reversal of Money Laundering Conviction in Caldwell v. United States

Date: Mar 31, 2009
Affirmation of Wire Fraud Conviction and Reversal of Money Laundering Conviction in Caldwell v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Gayle L. Caldwell, 560 F.3d 1214 (10th Cir....
Establishing the Precedence of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Brady Violations in Capital Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Establishing the Precedence of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Brady Violations in Capital Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Mar 27, 2009
Establishing the Precedence of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Brady Violations in Capital Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Yancy Lyndell Douglas and Paris LaPriest Powell...
Quasi-Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: MOSS v. KOPP

Quasi-Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: MOSS v. KOPP

Date: Mar 19, 2009
Quasi-Judicial Immunity in §1983 Claims: MOSS v. KOPP Introduction In the landmark case Susan I. Moss and Jamal S. Yanaki v. Heinz Kopp et al., decided on March 18, 2009, by the United States Court...
Zokari v. Gates: Tenth Circuit's Stance on Retaliation and Procedural Timeliness in Discrimination Claims

Zokari v. Gates: Tenth Circuit's Stance on Retaliation and Procedural Timeliness in Discrimination Claims

Date: Mar 18, 2009
Zokari v. Gates: Tenth Circuit's Stance on Retaliation and Procedural Timeliness in Discrimination Claims Introduction In the case of Sunday A. Zokari v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary of the Department...
Affirmation of Procedural Compliance in Pro Se Litigation: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Young v. United States

Affirmation of Procedural Compliance in Pro Se Litigation: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Young v. United States

Date: Mar 13, 2009
Affirmation of Procedural Compliance in Pro Se Litigation: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Young v. United States Introduction In the case of Timothy Doyle Young v. United States of America, heard by the...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in FCRA Litigation: Pinson v. Equifax et al.

Jurisdictional Boundaries in FCRA Litigation: Pinson v. Equifax et al.

Date: Mar 11, 2009
Jurisdictional Boundaries in FCRA Litigation: Pinson v. Equifax et al. Introduction In the case of Larry Darnell Pinson and Lennelle Oliver Pinson v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc., filed...
DICC Endorsement Excludes Regulatory Compliance Costs: Tenth Circuit Upholds Denial of Coverage to MarkWest Hydrocarbon

DICC Endorsement Excludes Regulatory Compliance Costs: Tenth Circuit Upholds Denial of Coverage to MarkWest Hydrocarbon

Date: Mar 10, 2009
DICC Endorsement Excludes Regulatory Compliance Costs: Tenth Circuit Upholds Denial of Coverage to MarkWest Hydrocarbon Introduction In the landmark case of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. v. Liberty...
Enforceability of Settlement Releases in FCA Qui Tam Actions Following Government Disclosure: Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin

Enforceability of Settlement Releases in FCA Qui Tam Actions Following Government Disclosure: Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin

Date: Mar 7, 2009
Enforceability of Settlement Releases in FCA Qui Tam Actions Following Government Disclosure: Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin Introduction In the landmark case of United States ex rel. Ruth Ritchie v....
Affirmation of Hearsay Exclusion and Cumulative Error Analysis in Drug Trafficking Conspiracy Convictions

Affirmation of Hearsay Exclusion and Cumulative Error Analysis in Drug Trafficking Conspiracy Convictions

Date: Mar 4, 2009
Affirmation of Hearsay Exclusion and Cumulative Error Analysis in Drug Trafficking Conspiracy Convictions Introduction The case of United States v. Jupiter Lamar Rogers, 556 F.3d 1130 (10th Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert