Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Standing Requirements in Civil Rights Challenges to Criminal Prohibitions of Polygamy: Bronson v. Swensen

Standing Requirements in Civil Rights Challenges to Criminal Prohibitions of Polygamy: Bronson v. Swensen

Date: Aug 30, 2007
Standing Requirements in Civil Rights Challenges to Criminal Prohibitions of Polygamy: Bronson et al. v. Swensen Introduction The case of J. Bronson, G. Lee Cook, and D. Cook (hereinafter...
Improper Use of Lis Pendens in Criminal Forfeiture: United States v. Jarvis Commentary

Improper Use of Lis Pendens in Criminal Forfeiture: United States v. Jarvis Commentary

Date: Aug 29, 2007
Improper Use of Lis Pendens in Criminal Forfeiture: United States v. Jarvis Commentary Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Dana Jarvis, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Defining 'Willful' Violations and Establishing Preponderance of Evidence Standard for Automatic Stay Violations under 11 U.S.C. § 362: In re Johnson & Johnson

Defining 'Willful' Violations and Establishing Preponderance of Evidence Standard for Automatic Stay Violations under 11 U.S.C. § 362: In re Johnson & Johnson

Date: Aug 29, 2007
Defining 'Willful' Violations and Establishing Preponderance of Evidence Standard for Automatic Stay Violations under 11 U.S.C. § 362: In re Johnson & Johnson Introduction The United States Court of...
Privacy Rights and Media Responsibility: A Comprehensive Analysis of Anderson v. Lohman SUITERS

Privacy Rights and Media Responsibility: A Comprehensive Analysis of Anderson v. Lohman SUITERS

Date: Aug 29, 2007
Privacy Rights and Media Responsibility: A Comprehensive Analysis of Anderson v. Lohman SUITERS Introduction Aundra Anderson sued Kimberly Lohman Suters, a reporter from KOCO-TV, along with the...
Consequential Damages in Contract Breach: O'TOOLE v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.

Consequential Damages in Contract Breach: O'TOOLE v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.

Date: Aug 29, 2007
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal advice regarding your situation, please consult a qualified attorney....
Enforcement of Timeliness in Title VII Claims: Analysis of Vail Clinic, Inc. v. Appellants

Enforcement of Timeliness in Title VII Claims: Analysis of Vail Clinic, Inc. v. Appellants

Date: Aug 15, 2007
Enforcement of Timeliness in Title VII Claims: Analysis of Vail Clinic, Inc. v. Appellants Introduction Vail Clinic, Inc. v. Ana Patricia Montes et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Reaffirming the Right to Petition: Van Deelen v. Johnson Establishes Broad First Amendment Protections for Private Citizens

Reaffirming the Right to Petition: Van Deelen v. Johnson Establishes Broad First Amendment Protections for Private Citizens

Date: Aug 15, 2007
Reaffirming the Right to Petition: Van Deelen v. Johnson Establishes Broad First Amendment Protections for Private Citizens Introduction The case of Michael D. Van Deelen v. Marion Johnson and...
Affirmation of Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: ECCLESIASTES 9:10-11-12, INC. v. LMC HOLDING COMPANY

Affirmation of Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: ECCLESIASTES 9:10-11-12, INC. v. LMC HOLDING COMPANY

Date: Aug 11, 2007
Affirmation of Rule 41(b) Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: ECCLESIASTES 9:10-11-12, INC. v. LMC HOLDING COMPANY Introduction In the case of ECCLESIASTES 9:10-11-12, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and...
Riggs v. AirTran Airways: Establishing Precedent on Age Discrimination and Summary Judgment Standards

Riggs v. AirTran Airways: Establishing Precedent on Age Discrimination and Summary Judgment Standards

Date: Aug 9, 2007
Riggs v. AirTran Airways: Establishing Precedent on Age Discrimination and Summary Judgment Standards Introduction In the landmark case of Riggs v. AirTran Airways, Inc., the United States Court of...
Enhanced Protection for Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Insights from Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc.

Enhanced Protection for Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Insights from Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc.

Date: Aug 8, 2007
Enhanced Protection for Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Insights from Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc. Introduction In Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc., adjudicated by the United States...
Totality of Circumstances Supports Reasonable Suspicion and Career Offender Classification in United States v. Patrick Karam

Totality of Circumstances Supports Reasonable Suspicion and Career Offender Classification in United States v. Patrick Karam

Date: Aug 8, 2007
Totality of Circumstances Supports Reasonable Suspicion and Career Offender Classification in United States v. Patrick Karam Introduction United States of America v. Patrick Karam is a pivotal case...
Brennan v. Astrue: Enhancing Due Process in Social Security Disability Evaluations

Brennan v. Astrue: Enhancing Due Process in Social Security Disability Evaluations

Date: Aug 8, 2007
Brennan v. Astrue: Enhancing Due Process in Social Security Disability Evaluations Introduction In the landmark case of Debbie Brennan v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security,...
Full Faith and Credit Clause Requires Oklahoma to Recognize Same-Sex Out-of-State Adoptions

Full Faith and Credit Clause Requires Oklahoma to Recognize Same-Sex Out-of-State Adoptions

Date: Aug 4, 2007
Full Faith and Credit Clause Requires Oklahoma to Recognize Same-Sex Out-of-State Adoptions Introduction In the landmark case of Heather Finstuen et al. v. Dr. Mike Crutcher et al., the United States...
Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Procedural Due Process: Darr v. Town of Telluride

Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Procedural Due Process: Darr v. Town of Telluride

Date: Aug 4, 2007
Reaffirming At-Will Employment and Procedural Due Process: Darr v. Town of Telluride Introduction In Michael Andrew Darr v. Town of Telluride, Colorado, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Competitive Injury Requirement for 'Unfair Practices' under Packers and Stockyards Act

Tenth Circuit Establishes Competitive Injury Requirement for 'Unfair Practices' under Packers and Stockyards Act

Date: Aug 1, 2007
Tenth Circuit Establishes Competitive Injury Requirement for 'Unfair Practices' under Packers and Stockyards Act Introduction In Charles Been et al. v. OK Industries, Inc. et al. (495 F.3d 1217, 10th...
Procedural Standards and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in §1983 Appeals: The Wallin Case

Procedural Standards and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in §1983 Appeals: The Wallin Case

Date: Jul 28, 2007
Procedural Standards and Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in §1983 Appeals: The Wallin Case Introduction The case of Oloyea D. Wallin v. Multiple Defendants (244 F. App'x 214) adjudicated by the United States...
Mootness in Student Press Litigation: Lane and Rice v. Simon and White

Mootness in Student Press Litigation: Lane and Rice v. Simon and White

Date: Jul 27, 2007
Mootness in Student Press Litigation: Lane and Rice v. Simon and White Introduction The case of Katie Lane and Sarah Rice v. Todd F. Simon and Stephen E. White addresses critical issues concerning...
Affirmation of Federal Death Sentence and Upholding Juror Selection Procedures in United States v. Barrett

Affirmation of Federal Death Sentence and Upholding Juror Selection Procedures in United States v. Barrett

Date: Jul 26, 2007
Affirmation of Federal Death Sentence and Upholding Juror Selection Procedures in United States v. Barrett Introduction The case of United States v. Kenneth Eugene Barrett presents a comprehensive...
Establishing Federal Court Jurisdiction for Enforcement of FCC Payphone Orders: TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation

Establishing Federal Court Jurisdiction for Enforcement of FCC Payphone Orders: TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation

Date: Jul 24, 2007
Establishing Federal Court Jurisdiction for Enforcement of FCC Payphone Orders: TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation Introduction The case of TON Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation, adjudicated...
BECKER v. KROLL: Tenth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Malicious Prosecution and Retaliation Claims

BECKER v. KROLL: Tenth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Malicious Prosecution and Retaliation Claims

Date: Jul 20, 2007
BECKER v. KROLL: Tenth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Malicious Prosecution and Retaliation Claims Introduction In BECKER v. KROLL, 494 F.3d 904 (10th Cir. 2007), Dr. Taj Becker, a neurologist from St....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert