Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Non-Excludable ECPA Evidence and Privacy Expectations in United States v. Perrine

Affirmation of Non-Excludable ECPA Evidence and Privacy Expectations in United States v. Perrine

Date: Mar 12, 2008
Affirmation of Non-Excludable ECPA Evidence and Privacy Expectations in United States v. Perrine Introduction United States of America v. Steven C. Perrine, 518 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2008), is a...
Kilgore v. Colorado: Shifting the Burden of Timeliness in Habeas Corpus Applications

Kilgore v. Colorado: Shifting the Burden of Timeliness in Habeas Corpus Applications

Date: Mar 12, 2008
Kilgore v. Colorado: Shifting the Burden of Timeliness in Habeas Corpus Applications Introduction In the landmark case of Kyle Keith Kilgore v. The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, the...
Affirmation of Perjury Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines Application in United States v. Timmy Brent Olsen

Affirmation of Perjury Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines Application in United States v. Timmy Brent Olsen

Date: Mar 12, 2008
Affirmation of Perjury Conviction and Sentencing Guidelines Application in United States v. Timmy Brent Olsen Introduction United States of America v. Timmy Brent Olsen is a significant appellate...
Clarifying First Amendment Protections Against Political Patronage: Gann v. Rinehart

Clarifying First Amendment Protections Against Political Patronage: Gann v. Rinehart

Date: Mar 12, 2008
Clarifying First Amendment Protections Against Political Patronage: Gann v. Rinehart Introduction Sharee Gann v. Brent Rinehart is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Exclusive Jurisdiction of the STB Preempts State Law Claims in Industrial Track Disputes

Exclusive Jurisdiction of the STB Preempts State Law Claims in Industrial Track Disputes

Date: Mar 11, 2008
Exclusive Jurisdiction of the STB Preempts State Law Claims in Industrial Track Disputes Introduction In the case of Port City Properties, Inc. d/b/a Hodges Warehouse and Alpine Properties, LLC...
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in §1983 Wrongful Detention Claims: Insights from Mondragón v. Thompson

Accrual of Statute of Limitations in §1983 Wrongful Detention Claims: Insights from Mondragón v. Thompson

Date: Mar 11, 2008
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in §1983 Wrongful Detention Claims: Insights from Mondragón v. Thompson Introduction Christopher Mondragón v. James William Thompson and José Leon Flores is a...
Enhanced Deference to District Court Sentencing Discretion under Gall and Kimbrough: Smart v. United States

Enhanced Deference to District Court Sentencing Discretion under Gall and Kimbrough: Smart v. United States

Date: Mar 5, 2008
Enhanced Deference to District Court Sentencing Discretion under Gall and Kimbrough: Smart v. United States Introduction The case of Plaintiff-Appellant v. Christopher Wayne Smart, 518 F.3d 800 (10th...
Proximate Cause and Expert Witness Immunity: Establishing Liability in Malpractice Appeals – Pace v. Swerdlow

Proximate Cause and Expert Witness Immunity: Establishing Liability in Malpractice Appeals – Pace v. Swerdlow

Date: Mar 5, 2008
Proximate Cause and Expert Witness Immunity: Establishing Liability in Malpractice Appeals – Pace v. Swerdlow Introduction In the landmark case of Pace v. Swerdlow, the United States Court of Appeals...
Work-Product Doctrine and Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver in United States v. Ary

Work-Product Doctrine and Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver in United States v. Ary

Date: Mar 5, 2008
Work-Product Doctrine and Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver in United States v. Ary Introduction United States of America v. Max L. Ary (518 F.3d 775) is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Mitchell v. United States: New Precedent on Sua Sponte Enforcement of Appellate Timeliness Rules

Mitchell v. United States: New Precedent on Sua Sponte Enforcement of Appellate Timeliness Rules

Date: Mar 1, 2008
Mitchell v. United States: New Precedent on Sua Sponte Enforcement of Appellate Timeliness Rules Introduction United States of America v. Roland Lorenzo Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740 (10th Cir. 2008), marks...
Establishing Standards for Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2254: Insights from Coronado v. Ward

Establishing Standards for Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2254: Insights from Coronado v. Ward

Date: Feb 29, 2008
Establishing Standards for Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2254: Insights from Coronado v. Ward Introduction José Coronado v. Ron Ward, Director; Attorney General of the State of...
No Sufficiency of Retaliation Evidence under Title VII: Fye v. OCC

No Sufficiency of Retaliation Evidence under Title VII: Fye v. OCC

Date: Feb 28, 2008
No Sufficiency of Retaliation Evidence under Title VII: Fye v. OCC Introduction Fye v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION) is a significant judicial decision rendered by...
Deliberate Indifference and Inmate Safety: Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Tafoya v. Salazar

Deliberate Indifference and Inmate Safety: Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Tafoya v. Salazar

Date: Feb 22, 2008
Deliberate Indifference and Inmate Safety: Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Tafoya v. Salazar Introduction In Michelle Tafoya v. Huerfano County Sheriff John Salazar (516 F.3d 912, 10th...
Validating Wiretap Procedures and Implied Consent in Drug Trafficking: United States v. Verdin-García and Romero

Validating Wiretap Procedures and Implied Consent in Drug Trafficking: United States v. Verdin-García and Romero

Date: Feb 20, 2008
Validating Wiretap Procedures and Implied Consent in Drug Trafficking: United States v. Verdin-García and Romero Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Fidencio...
Affirmation of Dual Jury Procedures and Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Brown v. Sirmons

Affirmation of Dual Jury Procedures and Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Brown v. Sirmons

Date: Feb 6, 2008
Affirmation of Dual Jury Procedures and Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Brown v. Sirmons Introduction Brown v. Sirmons, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit on...
Enhanced Evaluation of Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability Claims: Flaherty v. Astrue

Enhanced Evaluation of Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability Claims: Flaherty v. Astrue

Date: Feb 5, 2008
Enhanced Evaluation of Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability Claims: Flaherty v. Astrue Introduction The case of Victoria Flaherty v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social...
Familial Status Not Protected Under Title VII: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Adamson v. Multi Community Diversified Services

Familial Status Not Protected Under Title VII: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Adamson v. Multi Community Diversified Services

Date: Feb 2, 2008
Familial Status Not Protected Under Title VII: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Adamson v. Multi Community Diversified Services Introduction In the case of Barry B. Adamson, Patricia...
Chee v. United States: Affirmation of Non-Custodial Interrogation and Sentencing Enhancements for Abuse of Trust

Chee v. United States: Affirmation of Non-Custodial Interrogation and Sentencing Enhancements for Abuse of Trust

Date: Jan 30, 2008
Chee v. United States: Affirmation of Non-Custodial Interrogation and Sentencing Enhancements for Abuse of Trust Introduction In the case of Chee v. United States, 514 F.3d 1106 (10th Cir. 2008), the...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants Through Continuous Business Relations: AST Sports Science, Inc. v. CLF Distribution Limited

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants Through Continuous Business Relations: AST Sports Science, Inc. v. CLF Distribution Limited

Date: Jan 29, 2008
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants Through Continuous Business Relations Introduction In AST Sports Science, Inc. v. CLF Distribution Limited, 514 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2008),...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Through Targeted Online Enforcement: Dudnikov v. Chalk Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Through Targeted Online Enforcement: Dudnikov v. Chalk Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.

Date: Jan 29, 2008
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction Through Targeted Online Enforcement: Dudnikov v. Chalk Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Karen Dudnikov and Michael Meadors v. Chalk...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert