Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Equitable Tolling and Language Barriers in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ste v. YANG

Equitable Tolling and Language Barriers in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ste v. YANG

Date: Apr 23, 2008
Equitable Tolling and Language Barriers in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ste v. YANG Introduction The case of Steve Yang v. Lou Archuleta addresses the critical issue of whether...
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Federal Employment Termination Cases

Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Federal Employment Termination Cases

Date: Apr 23, 2008
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Federal Employment Termination Cases Introduction In the case of Brian Sydnes and Tom LaBrecque v. United States of America (523 F.3d...
Comprehensive Commentary on Stokes v. Astrue: Evaluating Disability Claims under the Social Security Act

Comprehensive Commentary on Stokes v. Astrue: Evaluating Disability Claims under the Social Security Act

Date: Apr 19, 2008
Comprehensive Commentary on Stokes v. Astrue: Evaluating Disability Claims under the Social Security Act Introduction The case of Mary D. Stokes v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security...
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Fogarty v. Gallegos: A Comprehensive Analysis

Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Fogarty v. Gallegos: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Apr 19, 2008
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Fogarty v. Gallegos: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of John D. Fogarty v. Gilbert Gallegos et al. (523 F.3d 1147) presents significant...
Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery: Upholding Summary Judgment in Title VII Race Discrimination Claim

Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery: Upholding Summary Judgment in Title VII Race Discrimination Claim

Date: Apr 19, 2008
Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery: Upholding Summary Judgment in Title VII Race Discrimination Claim Introduction In the case of Donald A. Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery, the United States...
Equitable Tolling in Federal Prison Litigation: Insights from United States v. Frank Gabaldon

Equitable Tolling in Federal Prison Litigation: Insights from United States v. Frank Gabaldon

Date: Apr 17, 2008
Equitable Tolling in Federal Prison Litigation: Insights from United States v. Frank Gabaldon 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Frank Gabaldon, adjudicated by the United States...
Obligation to Supplement Evidence in Disability Claims: Maes v. Astrue

Obligation to Supplement Evidence in Disability Claims: Maes v. Astrue

Date: Apr 15, 2008
Obligation to Supplement Evidence in Disability Claims: Maes v. Astrue Introduction In Martha A. Maes v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 522 F.3d 1093 (10th Cir....
SLUSA Preemption in State Law Securities Class Actions: Insights from Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch

SLUSA Preemption in State Law Securities Class Actions: Insights from Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch

Date: Apr 8, 2008
SLUSA Preemption in State Law Securities Class Actions: Insights from Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch Introduction The case of Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc. (No....
Establishing Article III Standing in Civil Forfeiture: Insights from United States v. $148,840.00 in U.S. Currency

Establishing Article III Standing in Civil Forfeiture: Insights from United States v. $148,840.00 in U.S. Currency

Date: Apr 5, 2008
Establishing Article III Standing in Civil Forfeiture: Insights from United States v. $148,840.00 in U.S. Currency Introduction The case of United States of America v. $148,840.00 in United States...
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Disciplinary Officials in Stein v. Disciplinary Board

Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Disciplinary Officials in Stein v. Disciplinary Board

Date: Apr 2, 2008
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Disciplinary Officials in Stein v. Disciplinary Board Introduction Stuart L. Stein and The Stein Law Firm (collectively referred to as the Plaintiffs-Appellants)...
Establishing the Scope of Statute of Limitations for Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII and §1981: Insights from Ranee Tademy v. Union Pacific Corporation

Establishing the Scope of Statute of Limitations for Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII and §1981: Insights from Ranee Tademy v. Union Pacific Corporation

Date: Apr 2, 2008
Establishing the Scope of Statute of Limitations for Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII and §1981: Insights from Ranee Tademy v. Union Pacific Corporation Introduction The case of Ranee...
Reversing Summary Judgment: Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. §1981 in Tademy v. Union Pacific

Reversing Summary Judgment: Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. §1981 in Tademy v. Union Pacific

Date: Apr 2, 2008
Reversing Summary Judgment: Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. §1981 in Tademy v. Union Pacific Introduction Tademy v. Union Pacific, 614 F.3d 1132 (10th Cir. 2008),...
Concurrent Sentencing and Habeas Corpus: United States v. Eccleston

Concurrent Sentencing and Habeas Corpus: United States v. Eccleston

Date: Apr 1, 2008
Concurrent Sentencing and Habeas Corpus: United States v. Eccleston Introduction United States of America v. Sebastian L. Eccleston, 521 F.3d 1249 (10th Cir. 2008), serves as a pivotal case in the...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Prospective Injunctive Relief in SOTMP Termination Case

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Prospective Injunctive Relief in SOTMP Termination Case

Date: Mar 29, 2008
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Prospective Injunctive Relief in SOTMP Termination Case Introduction The case of Dale Allen Hunt v. Colorado Department of Corrections reached...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Yellowbear Decision

Jurisdictional Clarity in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Yellowbear Decision

Date: Mar 22, 2008
Jurisdictional Clarity in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Yellowbear Decision Introduction The case of Andrew John Yellowbear, Jr. v. Wyoming Attorney General presents a pivotal moment in the...
Robbins v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services: Reinforcing the Standards for Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims

Robbins v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services: Reinforcing the Standards for Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims

Date: Mar 22, 2008
Robbins v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services: Reinforcing the Standards for Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims Introduction The case of Robbins v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services presents a...
Defining the Boundaries: Substantive Due Process and §1983 Claims in Government Officials’ Assault — Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent

Defining the Boundaries: Substantive Due Process and §1983 Claims in Government Officials’ Assault — Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent

Date: Mar 19, 2008
Defining the Boundaries: Substantive Due Process and §1983 Claims in Government Officials’ Assault — Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent Introduction The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of Reed...
Sanctions for Unreasonable Multiplication of Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Sanctions for Unreasonable Multiplication of Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Date: Mar 18, 2008
Sanctions for Unreasonable Multiplication of Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 Introduction The case of Kameisha Hamilton et al. v. Boise Cascade Express et al. (519 F.3d 1197, 10th Cir. 2008)...
Habecker v. Town of Estes Park: Establishing Limits on Standing in First Amendment Challenges

Habecker v. Town of Estes Park: Establishing Limits on Standing in First Amendment Challenges

Date: Mar 15, 2008
Habecker v. Town of Estes Park: Establishing Limits on Standing in First Amendment Challenges Introduction Habecker v. d HABECKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, (518 F.3d 1217) is a pivotal decision by the...
Navigating First Amendment Challenges to Judicial Conduct: Insights from the Tenth Circuit's Decision in Kansas Judicial Review

Navigating First Amendment Challenges to Judicial Conduct: Insights from the Tenth Circuit's Decision in Kansas Judicial Review

Date: Mar 13, 2008
Navigating First Amendment Challenges to Judicial Conduct: Insights from the Tenth Circuit's Decision in Kansas Judicial Review Introduction The case of Kansas Judicial Review, The Honorable Charles...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert