Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Finality of Served Sentences: Tenth Circuit Upholds Denial of 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) Motion to Reduce Completed Imprisonment

Finality of Served Sentences: Tenth Circuit Upholds Denial of 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) Motion to Reduce Completed Imprisonment

Date: Feb 10, 2024
Finality of Served Sentences: Tenth Circuit Upholds Denial of 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) Motion to Reduce Completed Imprisonment Introduction The case of United States of America v. Clayton Albers...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards for Age Discrimination Claims in Employment Termination Cases

Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards for Age Discrimination Claims in Employment Termination Cases

Date: Feb 10, 2024
Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards for Age Discrimination Claims in Employment Termination Cases Introduction In the case of Charles Cline v. Clinical Perfusion Systems, Inc., heard by the...
10th Circuit Reaffirms Constitutionality of § 922(g)(3) Against Vagueness Claims in United States v. Morales-Lopez

10th Circuit Reaffirms Constitutionality of § 922(g)(3) Against Vagueness Claims in United States v. Morales-Lopez

Date: Feb 10, 2024
10th Circuit Reaffirms Constitutionality of § 922(g)(3) Against Vagueness Claims in United States v. Morales-Lopez Introduction In United States of America v. Jonathan Alexander Morales-Lopez, 92...
Establishing Organizational Standing with Pseudonymous Members: Speech First, Inc. v. Shrum

Establishing Organizational Standing with Pseudonymous Members: Speech First, Inc. v. Shrum

Date: Feb 10, 2024
Establishing Organizational Standing with Pseudonymous Members: Speech First, Inc. v. Shrum Introduction In the landmark case Speech First, Inc. v. Kayse Shrum, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Vora v. Dionne: 10th Circuit Reinforces Firm Waiver Rule and Specific Personal Jurisdiction Standards

Vora v. Dionne: 10th Circuit Reinforces Firm Waiver Rule and Specific Personal Jurisdiction Standards

Date: Feb 10, 2024
Vora v. Dionne: 10th Circuit Reinforces Firm Waiver Rule and Specific Personal Jurisdiction Standards Introduction In the landmark case of Harit Umesh Vora v. Keith Dionne, Casma Therapeutics, CEO;...
Ambiguity in Insurance Policy Language: Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in BSM v. Landmark

Ambiguity in Insurance Policy Language: Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in BSM v. Landmark

Date: Feb 10, 2024
Ambiguity in Insurance Policy Language: Tenth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in BSM v. Landmark Introduction In the case of Brandon Steven Motors, LLC v. Landmark American Insurance Company, the...
ADA Accommodation Requirements: The Necessity of Specifying Impairment Duration in Employment Cases

ADA Accommodation Requirements: The Necessity of Specifying Impairment Duration in Employment Cases

Date: Feb 8, 2024
ADA Accommodation Requirements: The Necessity of Specifying Impairment Duration in Employment Cases Introduction Freeman v. City of Cheyenne is a notable appellate decision from the United States...
Clarifying State-Action Requirement: Public Defenders Excluded from §1983 Liability in Traditional Counsel Roles

Clarifying State-Action Requirement: Public Defenders Excluded from §1983 Liability in Traditional Counsel Roles

Date: Feb 8, 2024
Clarifying State-Action Requirement: Public Defenders Excluded from §1983 Liability in Traditional Counsel Roles Introduction In the landmark case of Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr. v. Wyoming Public...
Interpreting Indemnification Clauses and Damages in Sales Agreements: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in ORP Surgical v. Howmedica Osteonics

Interpreting Indemnification Clauses and Damages in Sales Agreements: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in ORP Surgical v. Howmedica Osteonics

Date: Feb 7, 2024
Interpreting Indemnification Clauses and Damages in Sales Agreements: The Tenth Circuit's Decision in ORP Surgical v. Howmedica Osteonics Introduction The case of ORP Surgical, LLC and Lee Petrides...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Clarification on "Crime of Violence" Classification for Indivisible Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6)

Tenth Circuit Establishes Clarification on "Crime of Violence" Classification for Indivisible Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6)

Date: Feb 7, 2024
Tenth Circuit Establishes Clarification on "Crime of Violence" Classification for Indivisible Offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6) Introduction The case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH...
Xu v. Denver Public Schools: Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Xu v. Denver Public Schools: Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Date: Feb 7, 2024
Xu v. Denver Public Schools: Upholding Summary Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Introduction In the case of Chunyi Xu, a/k/a David Xu v. Denver Public Schools,...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Postconviction Relief

Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Postconviction Relief

Date: Feb 7, 2024
Tenth Circuit Upholds Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability in Postconviction Relief Introduction In the case of Michael Dewayne Bell v. United States of America, the United States Court...
Limits on Bivens Claims Against Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Established in Logsdon v. U.S. Marshal Service

Limits on Bivens Claims Against Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Established in Logsdon v. U.S. Marshal Service

Date: Feb 6, 2024
Limits on Bivens Claims Against Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Established in Logsdon v. U.S. Marshal Service Introduction The case of Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr. v. United States Marshal Service (91...
Judicial Immunity Reinforced in Warner v. Lund: Affirmation of Dismissal under §1983 and State Law

Judicial Immunity Reinforced in Warner v. Lund: Affirmation of Dismissal under §1983 and State Law

Date: Feb 1, 2024
Judicial Immunity Reinforced in Warner v. Lund: Affirmation of Dismissal under §1983 and State Law Introduction Warner v. Lund is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Precedent on Mootness in Prisoner Injunctive Relief: Norton v. Parsons et al.

Precedent on Mootness in Prisoner Injunctive Relief: Norton v. Parsons et al.

Date: Feb 1, 2024
Precedent on Mootness in Prisoner Injunctive Relief: Norton v. Parsons et al. Introduction In the case of Lonnie Norton v. Michael Parsons; Danny White; F. McNiel; FNU Romero, adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Sovereign Immunity Limits in Employment Discrimination Claims

Affirmation of Sovereign Immunity Limits in Employment Discrimination Claims

Date: Feb 1, 2024
Affirmation of Sovereign Immunity Limits in Employment Discrimination Claims Introduction The appellate case of Vincent DeWayne Gaylord v. State of Kansas addresses critical issues surrounding...
Affirmation of Dismissal in §1983 Claims under the Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act

Affirmation of Dismissal in §1983 Claims under the Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act

Date: Feb 1, 2024
Affirmation of Dismissal in §1983 Claims under the Kansas Sexually Violent Predator Act Introduction In Merryfield v. Howard et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit addressed...
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Motion to Reopen Denial: Valle-Hernández v. Garland

Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Motion to Reopen Denial: Valle-Hernández v. Garland

Date: Jan 30, 2024
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Motion to Reopen Denial: Valle-Hernández v. Garland Introduction Valle-Hernández v. Garland is a significant appellate decision rendered by the...
Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2): Insights from United States v. Mathews

Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2): Insights from United States v. Mathews

Date: Jan 26, 2024
Strict Standards for Certificate of Appealability Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2): Insights from United States v. Mathews Introduction The case of United States of America v. Vincent Mathews serves as a...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Time-Barred Habeas Petition: Implications of Hilburn v. Rankins

Tenth Circuit Upholds Time-Barred Habeas Petition: Implications of Hilburn v. Rankins

Date: Jan 26, 2024
Tenth Circuit Upholds Time-Barred Habeas Petition: Implications of Hilburn v. Rankins Introduction In the case of Ralph Richard Hilburn, II v. William Rankins, Warden, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert